酶法清创与手术清创的比较:西班牙烧伤科的成本分析。

Annals of burns and fire disasters Pub Date : 2024-03-31 eCollection Date: 2024-03-01
I Ustarroz-Aguirre, B García-Lorenzo, M T Acaiturri-Ayesta, E Gómez-Inhiesto, P Martin-Playa
{"title":"酶法清创与手术清创的比较:西班牙烧伤科的成本分析。","authors":"I Ustarroz-Aguirre, B García-Lorenzo, M T Acaiturri-Ayesta, E Gómez-Inhiesto, P Martin-Playa","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The standard care for burns is tangential surgical debridement and subsequent covering, but recently enzymatic debridement has appeared as an alternative. The objective of this study, using an individualised cost-per-patient information system, is to compare the cost per patient of these two alternatives and identify their main determining factors. A non-randomised, retrospective, observational study was carried out with 79 patients, 39 of whom were treated with surgical debridement. The average cost per patient for enzymatic debridement is lower, particularly due to a shorter length of stay of critical hospitalisation (13.7 vs. 18.9 days; €26,101 vs. €33,919), a decreased need for surgical procedures (0.45 vs. 1.28) and a shorter use of operating theatres (53 vs. 202 minutes; €904 vs. €3,000). Age, aetiology, evolution length and percentage TBSA are robust determinants of the cost of care for burn patients. The type of procedure does not appear to significantly affect the cost per patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":93873,"journal":{"name":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","volume":"37 1","pages":"45-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11041863/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enzymatic Debridement Compared To Surgical Debridement: A Cost Analysis in a Burn Unit in Spain.\",\"authors\":\"I Ustarroz-Aguirre, B García-Lorenzo, M T Acaiturri-Ayesta, E Gómez-Inhiesto, P Martin-Playa\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The standard care for burns is tangential surgical debridement and subsequent covering, but recently enzymatic debridement has appeared as an alternative. The objective of this study, using an individualised cost-per-patient information system, is to compare the cost per patient of these two alternatives and identify their main determining factors. A non-randomised, retrospective, observational study was carried out with 79 patients, 39 of whom were treated with surgical debridement. The average cost per patient for enzymatic debridement is lower, particularly due to a shorter length of stay of critical hospitalisation (13.7 vs. 18.9 days; €26,101 vs. €33,919), a decreased need for surgical procedures (0.45 vs. 1.28) and a shorter use of operating theatres (53 vs. 202 minutes; €904 vs. €3,000). Age, aetiology, evolution length and percentage TBSA are robust determinants of the cost of care for burn patients. The type of procedure does not appear to significantly affect the cost per patient.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of burns and fire disasters\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"45-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11041863/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of burns and fire disasters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

烧伤的标准治疗方法是切口手术清创和随后的覆盖,但最近出现了酶法清创作为替代方法。本研究使用个性化的患者成本信息系统,旨在比较这两种替代方法的患者人均成本,并确定其主要决定因素。我们对 79 名患者进行了非随机、回顾性的观察研究,其中 39 人接受了外科清创治疗。每位患者接受酶解清创术的平均费用较低,这主要是由于危重病人的住院时间较短(13.7 天对 18.9 天;26,101 欧元对 33,919 欧元),对外科手术的需求减少(0.45 次对 1.28 次),手术室的使用时间较短(53 分钟对 202 分钟;904 欧元对 3,000 欧元)。年龄、病因、进化长度和总热辐射面积百分比是烧伤患者护理成本的重要决定因素。手术类型似乎对每位患者的成本影响不大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enzymatic Debridement Compared To Surgical Debridement: A Cost Analysis in a Burn Unit in Spain.

The standard care for burns is tangential surgical debridement and subsequent covering, but recently enzymatic debridement has appeared as an alternative. The objective of this study, using an individualised cost-per-patient information system, is to compare the cost per patient of these two alternatives and identify their main determining factors. A non-randomised, retrospective, observational study was carried out with 79 patients, 39 of whom were treated with surgical debridement. The average cost per patient for enzymatic debridement is lower, particularly due to a shorter length of stay of critical hospitalisation (13.7 vs. 18.9 days; €26,101 vs. €33,919), a decreased need for surgical procedures (0.45 vs. 1.28) and a shorter use of operating theatres (53 vs. 202 minutes; €904 vs. €3,000). Age, aetiology, evolution length and percentage TBSA are robust determinants of the cost of care for burn patients. The type of procedure does not appear to significantly affect the cost per patient.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信