Myriam Nadeau, Dominique Chabot, Mylaine Breton, Jason R Guertin, Laurie Harvey Labbé, Danièle Roberge, Gabrielle Lefebvre, Myriam Mallet, Sandrine Beaulieu, Éric Kavanagh, Nathalie Cloutier, Philippe Garant, Lynda Bélanger, Samuel Vaillancourt, Tarek Boumenna, Kathryn Bareil, Joanie Savard, David Simonyan, Mahukpe Narcisse Ulrich Singbo, Simon Berthelot
{"title":"为有紧急意外需求的门诊病人开发病人体验报告测量工具:APEX 问卷。","authors":"Myriam Nadeau, Dominique Chabot, Mylaine Breton, Jason R Guertin, Laurie Harvey Labbé, Danièle Roberge, Gabrielle Lefebvre, Myriam Mallet, Sandrine Beaulieu, Éric Kavanagh, Nathalie Cloutier, Philippe Garant, Lynda Bélanger, Samuel Vaillancourt, Tarek Boumenna, Kathryn Bareil, Joanie Savard, David Simonyan, Mahukpe Narcisse Ulrich Singbo, Simon Berthelot","doi":"10.1177/23743735241229373","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The aim of this study was to develop a patient-reported experience measure (PREM) for comparing the experience of care received by ambulatory patients with acute unexpected needs presenting in emergency departments (EDs), walk-in clinics, and primary care practices. <b>Methods:</b> The Ambulatory Patient EXperience (APEX) questionnaire was developed using a 5-phase mixed-methods approach. The questionnaire was pretested by asking potential users to rate its clarity, usefulness, redundancy, content and face validities, and discrimination on a 9-point scale (1 = strongly disagree to 9 = strongly agree). The pre-final version was then tested in a pilot study. <b>Results:</b> The final questionnaire is composed of 61 questions divided into 7 sections. In the pretest (n = 25), median responses were 8 and above for all dimensions assessed. In the pilot study, 63 participants were enrolled. Adjusted results show that access, cleanliness, and feeling treated with respect and dignity by nurses and physicians were significantly better in the clinics than in the ED. <b>Conclusion:</b> We developed a questionnaire to assess and compare experience of ambulatory care in different clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"11 ","pages":"23743735241229373"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11010752/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Patient-Reported Experience Measure Tool for Ambulatory Patients With Acute Unexpected Needs: The APEX Questionnaire.\",\"authors\":\"Myriam Nadeau, Dominique Chabot, Mylaine Breton, Jason R Guertin, Laurie Harvey Labbé, Danièle Roberge, Gabrielle Lefebvre, Myriam Mallet, Sandrine Beaulieu, Éric Kavanagh, Nathalie Cloutier, Philippe Garant, Lynda Bélanger, Samuel Vaillancourt, Tarek Boumenna, Kathryn Bareil, Joanie Savard, David Simonyan, Mahukpe Narcisse Ulrich Singbo, Simon Berthelot\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23743735241229373\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The aim of this study was to develop a patient-reported experience measure (PREM) for comparing the experience of care received by ambulatory patients with acute unexpected needs presenting in emergency departments (EDs), walk-in clinics, and primary care practices. <b>Methods:</b> The Ambulatory Patient EXperience (APEX) questionnaire was developed using a 5-phase mixed-methods approach. The questionnaire was pretested by asking potential users to rate its clarity, usefulness, redundancy, content and face validities, and discrimination on a 9-point scale (1 = strongly disagree to 9 = strongly agree). The pre-final version was then tested in a pilot study. <b>Results:</b> The final questionnaire is composed of 61 questions divided into 7 sections. In the pretest (n = 25), median responses were 8 and above for all dimensions assessed. In the pilot study, 63 participants were enrolled. Adjusted results show that access, cleanliness, and feeling treated with respect and dignity by nurses and physicians were significantly better in the clinics than in the ED. <b>Conclusion:</b> We developed a questionnaire to assess and compare experience of ambulatory care in different clinical settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient Experience\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"23743735241229373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11010752/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient Experience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735241229373\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735241229373","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of a Patient-Reported Experience Measure Tool for Ambulatory Patients With Acute Unexpected Needs: The APEX Questionnaire.
Background: The aim of this study was to develop a patient-reported experience measure (PREM) for comparing the experience of care received by ambulatory patients with acute unexpected needs presenting in emergency departments (EDs), walk-in clinics, and primary care practices. Methods: The Ambulatory Patient EXperience (APEX) questionnaire was developed using a 5-phase mixed-methods approach. The questionnaire was pretested by asking potential users to rate its clarity, usefulness, redundancy, content and face validities, and discrimination on a 9-point scale (1 = strongly disagree to 9 = strongly agree). The pre-final version was then tested in a pilot study. Results: The final questionnaire is composed of 61 questions divided into 7 sections. In the pretest (n = 25), median responses were 8 and above for all dimensions assessed. In the pilot study, 63 participants were enrolled. Adjusted results show that access, cleanliness, and feeling treated with respect and dignity by nurses and physicians were significantly better in the clinics than in the ED. Conclusion: We developed a questionnaire to assess and compare experience of ambulatory care in different clinical settings.