对直接用于革兰氏阴性病原体阳性血培养瓶的自动快速表型抗菌药物敏感性测试（ASTar，Q-linea AB）进行评估。

IF 1.5 4区医学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY

New Microbiologica Pub Date : 2024-05-01

Isabella Banchini, Eva Caterina Borgatti, Claudio Foschi, Tiziana Lazzarotto, Simone Ambretti

{"title":"对直接用于革兰氏阴性病原体阳性血培养瓶的自动快速表型抗菌药物敏感性测试（ASTar，Q-linea AB）进行评估。","authors":"Isabella Banchini, Eva Caterina Borgatti, Claudio Foschi, Tiziana Lazzarotto, Simone Ambretti","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We evaluated the performance of a new rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility test (ASTar; Q-linea AB) on Gram-negative bacilli, directly from positive blood cultures bottles. MIC values obtained by the routine reference method (Microscan, Beckman Coulter) were compared to the ones provided by the tested method (ASTar). ASTar demonstrated an overall essential agreement of 98% and a category agreement of 96.1%. The overall rate of major errors and very major errors was 2.5% and 3.3%, respectively. ASTar can represent a rapid, simple, and reliable method to speed up information about antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative pathogens from positive blood culture bottles.","PeriodicalId":54723,"journal":{"name":"New Microbiologica","volume":"47 1","pages":"107-110"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of an automated rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (ASTar, Q-linea AB) applied directly on blood cultures bottles positive for Gram-negative pathogens.\",\"authors\":\"Isabella Banchini, Eva Caterina Borgatti, Claudio Foschi, Tiziana Lazzarotto, Simone Ambretti\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We evaluated the performance of a new rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility test (ASTar; Q-linea AB) on Gram-negative bacilli, directly from positive blood cultures bottles. MIC values obtained by the routine reference method (Microscan, Beckman Coulter) were compared to the ones provided by the tested method (ASTar). ASTar demonstrated an overall essential agreement of 98% and a category agreement of 96.1%. The overall rate of major errors and very major errors was 2.5% and 3.3%, respectively. ASTar can represent a rapid, simple, and reliable method to speed up information about antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative pathogens from positive blood culture bottles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Microbiologica\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"107-110\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Microbiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Microbiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

我们评估了一种新型快速表型抗菌药物敏感性检测方法（ASTar；Q-linea AB）对革兰氏阴性杆菌（直接来自阳性血培养瓶）的检测效果。将常规参考方法（Microscan，贝克曼库尔特公司）获得的 MIC 值与测试方法（ASTar）提供的 MIC 值进行了比较。ASTar 的总体基本一致率为 98%，类别一致率为 96.1%。重大错误和极重大错误的总体比率分别为 2.5% 和 3.3%。ASTar 是一种快速、简单、可靠的方法，可加快从阳性血培养瓶中获得革兰氏阴性病原体抗菌药物敏感性的信息。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

本刊更多论文

Evaluation of an automated rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (ASTar, Q-linea AB) applied directly on blood cultures bottles positive for Gram-negative pathogens.

We evaluated the performance of a new rapid phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility test (ASTar; Q-linea AB) on Gram-negative bacilli, directly from positive blood cultures bottles. MIC values obtained by the routine reference method (Microscan, Beckman Coulter) were compared to the ones provided by the tested method (ASTar). ASTar demonstrated an overall essential agreement of 98% and a category agreement of 96.1%. The overall rate of major errors and very major errors was 2.5% and 3.3%, respectively. ASTar can represent a rapid, simple, and reliable method to speed up information about antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative pathogens from positive blood culture bottles.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

New Microbiologica 生物-微生物学

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

5.60%

发文量

审稿时长

6-12 weeks

期刊介绍： The publication, diffusion and furtherance of research and study on all aspects of basic and clinical Microbiology and related fields are the chief aims of the journal.