关于消除器官捐献抑制因素和引入器官捐献激励机制的公众意见:提出欧洲研究议程。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Transplant International Pub Date : 2024-04-03 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ti.2024.12483
Frederike Ambagtsheer, Eline Bunnik, Liset H M Pengel, Marlies Ej Reinders, Julio J Elias, Nicola Lacetera, Mario Macis
{"title":"关于消除器官捐献抑制因素和引入器官捐献激励机制的公众意见:提出欧洲研究议程。","authors":"Frederike Ambagtsheer, Eline Bunnik, Liset H M Pengel, Marlies Ej Reinders, Julio J Elias, Nicola Lacetera, Mario Macis","doi":"10.3389/ti.2024.12483","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The shortage of organs for transplantations is increasing in Europe as well as globally. Many initiatives to the organ shortage, such as opt-out systems for deceased donation and expanding living donation, have been insufficient to meet the rising demand for organs. In recurrent discussions on how to reduce organ shortage, financial incentives and removal of disincentives, have been proposed to stimulate living organ donation and increase the pool of available donor organs. It is important to understand not only the ethical acceptability of (dis)incentives for organ donation, but also its societal acceptance. In this review, we propose a research agenda to help guide future empirical studies on public preferences in Europe towards the removal of disincentives and introduction of incentives for organ donation. We first present a systematic literature review on public opinions concerning (financial) (dis)incentives for organ donation in European countries. Next, we describe the results of a randomized survey experiment conducted in the United States. This experiment is crucial because it suggests that societal support for incentivizing organ donation depends on the specific features and institutional design of the proposed incentive scheme. We conclude by proposing this experiment's framework as a blueprint for European research on this topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":23343,"journal":{"name":"Transplant International","volume":"37 ","pages":"12483"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11027084/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Public Opinions on Removing Disincentives and Introducing Incentives for Organ Donation: Proposing a European Research Agenda.\",\"authors\":\"Frederike Ambagtsheer, Eline Bunnik, Liset H M Pengel, Marlies Ej Reinders, Julio J Elias, Nicola Lacetera, Mario Macis\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/ti.2024.12483\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The shortage of organs for transplantations is increasing in Europe as well as globally. Many initiatives to the organ shortage, such as opt-out systems for deceased donation and expanding living donation, have been insufficient to meet the rising demand for organs. In recurrent discussions on how to reduce organ shortage, financial incentives and removal of disincentives, have been proposed to stimulate living organ donation and increase the pool of available donor organs. It is important to understand not only the ethical acceptability of (dis)incentives for organ donation, but also its societal acceptance. In this review, we propose a research agenda to help guide future empirical studies on public preferences in Europe towards the removal of disincentives and introduction of incentives for organ donation. We first present a systematic literature review on public opinions concerning (financial) (dis)incentives for organ donation in European countries. Next, we describe the results of a randomized survey experiment conducted in the United States. This experiment is crucial because it suggests that societal support for incentivizing organ donation depends on the specific features and institutional design of the proposed incentive scheme. We conclude by proposing this experiment's framework as a blueprint for European research on this topic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transplant International\",\"volume\":\"37 \",\"pages\":\"12483\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11027084/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transplant International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2024.12483\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transplant International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ti.2024.12483","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在欧洲和全球范围内,用于移植的器官短缺问题日益严重。许多应对器官短缺的举措,如选择不捐献已故器官和扩大活体器官捐献等,都不足以满足对器官日益增长的需求。在关于如何减少器官短缺的反复讨论中,人们提出了经济激励措施和取消抑制措施,以刺激活体器官捐献和增加可用的捐献器官库。重要的是,不仅要了解器官捐献(抑制)激励措施在道德上的可接受性,还要了解其社会接受度。在本综述中,我们提出了一个研究议程,以帮助指导未来关于欧洲公众对取消器官捐献抑制措施和引入器官捐献激励措施的偏好的实证研究。首先,我们对欧洲国家公众对器官捐献的(经济)(不)激励措施的看法进行了系统的文献综述。接下来,我们介绍了在美国进行的随机调查实验的结果。这项实验至关重要,因为它表明,社会对器官捐献激励机制的支持取决于激励机制的具体特征和制度设计。最后,我们提出了这一实验的框架,作为欧洲研究这一主题的蓝图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Public Opinions on Removing Disincentives and Introducing Incentives for Organ Donation: Proposing a European Research Agenda.

The shortage of organs for transplantations is increasing in Europe as well as globally. Many initiatives to the organ shortage, such as opt-out systems for deceased donation and expanding living donation, have been insufficient to meet the rising demand for organs. In recurrent discussions on how to reduce organ shortage, financial incentives and removal of disincentives, have been proposed to stimulate living organ donation and increase the pool of available donor organs. It is important to understand not only the ethical acceptability of (dis)incentives for organ donation, but also its societal acceptance. In this review, we propose a research agenda to help guide future empirical studies on public preferences in Europe towards the removal of disincentives and introduction of incentives for organ donation. We first present a systematic literature review on public opinions concerning (financial) (dis)incentives for organ donation in European countries. Next, we describe the results of a randomized survey experiment conducted in the United States. This experiment is crucial because it suggests that societal support for incentivizing organ donation depends on the specific features and institutional design of the proposed incentive scheme. We conclude by proposing this experiment's framework as a blueprint for European research on this topic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transplant International
Transplant International 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
6.50%
发文量
211
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of the journal is to serve as a forum for the exchange of scientific information in the form of original and high quality papers in the field of transplantation. Clinical and experimental studies, as well as editorials, letters to the editors, and, occasionally, reviews on the biology, physiology, and immunology of transplantation of tissues and organs, are published. Publishing time for the latter is approximately six months, provided major revisions are not needed. The journal is published in yearly volumes, each volume containing twelve issues. Papers submitted to the journal are subject to peer review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信