口内扫描仪成像对牙菌斑检测的实用性。

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Imaging Science in Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-04 DOI:10.5624/isd.20230180
Chihiro Yoshiga, Kazuya Doi, Hiroshi Oue, Reiko Kobatake, Maiko Kawagoe, Hanako Umehara, Kazuhiro Tsuga
{"title":"口内扫描仪成像对牙菌斑检测的实用性。","authors":"Chihiro Yoshiga, Kazuya Doi, Hiroshi Oue, Reiko Kobatake, Maiko Kawagoe, Hanako Umehara, Kazuhiro Tsuga","doi":"10.5624/isd.20230180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Oral hygiene, maintained through plaque control, helps prevent periodontal disease and dental caries. This study was conducted to examine the accuracy of plaque detection with an intraoral scanner (IOS) compared to images captured with an optical camera.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>To examine the effect of color tone, artificial tooth resin samples were stained red, blue, and green, after which images were acquired with a digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera and an IOS device. Stained surface ratios were then determined and compared. Additionally, the deviation rate of the IOS relative to the DSLR camera was computed for each color. In the clinical study, following plaque staining with red disclosing solution, the staining was captured by the DSLR and IOS devices, and the stained area on each image was measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stained surface ratios did not differ significantly between DSLR and IOS images for any color group. Additionally, the deviation rate did not vary significantly across colors. In the clinical test, the stained plaque appeared slightly lighter in color, and the delineation of the stained areas less distinct, on the IOS compared to the DSLR images. However, the stained surface ratio was significantly higher in the IOS than in the DSLR group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When employing IOS with dental plaque staining, the impact of color was minimal, suggesting that the traditional red stain remains suitable for plaque detection. IOS images appeared relatively blurred and enlarged relative to the true state of the teeth, due to inferior sharpness compared to camera images.</p>","PeriodicalId":51714,"journal":{"name":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","volume":"54 1","pages":"43-48"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10985524/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of intraoral scanner imaging for dental plaque detection.\",\"authors\":\"Chihiro Yoshiga, Kazuya Doi, Hiroshi Oue, Reiko Kobatake, Maiko Kawagoe, Hanako Umehara, Kazuhiro Tsuga\",\"doi\":\"10.5624/isd.20230180\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Oral hygiene, maintained through plaque control, helps prevent periodontal disease and dental caries. This study was conducted to examine the accuracy of plaque detection with an intraoral scanner (IOS) compared to images captured with an optical camera.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>To examine the effect of color tone, artificial tooth resin samples were stained red, blue, and green, after which images were acquired with a digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera and an IOS device. Stained surface ratios were then determined and compared. Additionally, the deviation rate of the IOS relative to the DSLR camera was computed for each color. In the clinical study, following plaque staining with red disclosing solution, the staining was captured by the DSLR and IOS devices, and the stained area on each image was measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The stained surface ratios did not differ significantly between DSLR and IOS images for any color group. Additionally, the deviation rate did not vary significantly across colors. In the clinical test, the stained plaque appeared slightly lighter in color, and the delineation of the stained areas less distinct, on the IOS compared to the DSLR images. However, the stained surface ratio was significantly higher in the IOS than in the DSLR group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>When employing IOS with dental plaque staining, the impact of color was minimal, suggesting that the traditional red stain remains suitable for plaque detection. IOS images appeared relatively blurred and enlarged relative to the true state of the teeth, due to inferior sharpness compared to camera images.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Imaging Science in Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"43-48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10985524/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Imaging Science in Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20230180\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20230180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过控制牙菌斑保持口腔卫生有助于预防牙周病和龋齿。本研究旨在检验口内扫描仪(IOS)与光学相机拍摄的图像相比,牙菌斑检测的准确性:为了研究色调的影响,人工牙齿树脂样本被染成红色、蓝色和绿色,然后用数码单反相机(DSLR)和 IOS 设备采集图像。然后确定染色表面比率并进行比较。此外,还计算了每种颜色的 IOS 相对于数码单反相机的偏差率。在临床研究中,用红色披露液对斑块染色后,用数码单反相机和 IOS 设备捕捉染色,并测量每张图像上的染色面积:结果:在任何颜色组别中,DSLR 和 IOS 图像的染色表面比率均无明显差异。此外,不同颜色的偏差率也无明显差异。在临床测试中,与数码单反相机图像相比,IOS 图像上染色斑块的颜色略浅,染色区域的划分也不明显。然而,IOS 组的染色表面比率明显高于 DSLR 组:结论:使用 IOS 进行牙菌斑染色时,颜色的影响微乎其微,这表明传统的红色染色仍然适用于牙菌斑检测。与照相机图像相比,IOS 图像的清晰度较低,因此相对于牙齿的真实情况而言,IOS 图像显得相对模糊和放大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utility of intraoral scanner imaging for dental plaque detection.

Purpose: Oral hygiene, maintained through plaque control, helps prevent periodontal disease and dental caries. This study was conducted to examine the accuracy of plaque detection with an intraoral scanner (IOS) compared to images captured with an optical camera.

Materials and methods: To examine the effect of color tone, artificial tooth resin samples were stained red, blue, and green, after which images were acquired with a digital single-lens reflex (DSLR) camera and an IOS device. Stained surface ratios were then determined and compared. Additionally, the deviation rate of the IOS relative to the DSLR camera was computed for each color. In the clinical study, following plaque staining with red disclosing solution, the staining was captured by the DSLR and IOS devices, and the stained area on each image was measured.

Results: The stained surface ratios did not differ significantly between DSLR and IOS images for any color group. Additionally, the deviation rate did not vary significantly across colors. In the clinical test, the stained plaque appeared slightly lighter in color, and the delineation of the stained areas less distinct, on the IOS compared to the DSLR images. However, the stained surface ratio was significantly higher in the IOS than in the DSLR group.

Conclusion: When employing IOS with dental plaque staining, the impact of color was minimal, suggesting that the traditional red stain remains suitable for plaque detection. IOS images appeared relatively blurred and enlarged relative to the true state of the teeth, due to inferior sharpness compared to camera images.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Imaging Science in Dentistry
Imaging Science in Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信