神经内科农村就医模式的运行影响:对需求塑造重要性的思考。

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-05 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200274
Alexis Kurek, Kennedy Boone-Sautter, Cynthia M Hingtgen, Aiesha Ahmed
{"title":"神经内科农村就医模式的运行影响:对需求塑造重要性的思考。","authors":"Alexis Kurek, Kennedy Boone-Sautter, Cynthia M Hingtgen, Aiesha Ahmed","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Demand for specialty neurologic care has been steadily increasing over the past several decades, and health systems are needing to meet the demands of their patients while managing a dwindling workforce. This retrospective study investigates the operational impact of a regional neurology clinic staffed by advanced practice providers with remote physician oversight in a \"hub and spoke\" delivery model to serve lower complexity patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate outcomes. Descriptive analysis of referral volumes, cancellation/no-show rates, and patient complexity as determined by the reason for referral were used to evaluate patients who received referrals from rural counties north of the primary neurology practice before and after the opening of the regional clinic. These metrics were evaluated longitudinally from counties of interest and for differences in patients seen at the regional clinic vs primary neurology practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Referral volumes from the northern counties increased at significantly higher rates after the opening of the regional clinic than other counties in the serviced area. This resulted in an increase in patients seen in the hub clinics and spoke clinic. The regional clinic did see patients who were less complex than the primary practice; however, the total volume of low-complexity patients scheduled at the primary practice did not decrease. Cancellation and no-show rates did not seem to be affected in either clinic.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The opening of a regional \"spoke\" clinic resulted in the generation of greater referral volumes that exceeded the capacity created by the clinic. Owing to this, there was an increase in the number of patients seen from the regional counties in the hub clinics, negating the potential benefit of improving access for high-complexity patients. Importance of demand-shaping and appropriate utilization as part of the value equation are discussed, followed by discussion of mitigation strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11010244/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operational Impact of Neurology Rural Access Model: Reflections on the Importance of Demand-Shaping.\",\"authors\":\"Alexis Kurek, Kennedy Boone-Sautter, Cynthia M Hingtgen, Aiesha Ahmed\",\"doi\":\"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200274\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Demand for specialty neurologic care has been steadily increasing over the past several decades, and health systems are needing to meet the demands of their patients while managing a dwindling workforce. This retrospective study investigates the operational impact of a regional neurology clinic staffed by advanced practice providers with remote physician oversight in a \\\"hub and spoke\\\" delivery model to serve lower complexity patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate outcomes. Descriptive analysis of referral volumes, cancellation/no-show rates, and patient complexity as determined by the reason for referral were used to evaluate patients who received referrals from rural counties north of the primary neurology practice before and after the opening of the regional clinic. These metrics were evaluated longitudinally from counties of interest and for differences in patients seen at the regional clinic vs primary neurology practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Referral volumes from the northern counties increased at significantly higher rates after the opening of the regional clinic than other counties in the serviced area. This resulted in an increase in patients seen in the hub clinics and spoke clinic. The regional clinic did see patients who were less complex than the primary practice; however, the total volume of low-complexity patients scheduled at the primary practice did not decrease. Cancellation and no-show rates did not seem to be affected in either clinic.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The opening of a regional \\\"spoke\\\" clinic resulted in the generation of greater referral volumes that exceeded the capacity created by the clinic. Owing to this, there was an increase in the number of patients seen from the regional counties in the hub clinics, negating the potential benefit of improving access for high-complexity patients. Importance of demand-shaping and appropriate utilization as part of the value equation are discussed, followed by discussion of mitigation strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11010244/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurology. Clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200274\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:过去几十年来,神经病学专科护理的需求一直在稳步增长,医疗系统需要在满足患者需求的同时管理日益减少的劳动力。这项回顾性研究调查了一个地区性神经病学诊所的运营影响,该诊所由高级医疗服务提供者提供人员,并由远程医生进行监督,以 "中心辐射 "的服务模式为复杂性较低的患者提供服务:方法: 为评估结果,我们开展了一项回顾性横断面研究。通过对转诊量、取消/缺席率以及根据转诊原因确定的患者复杂性进行描述性分析,对地区诊所开业前后从主要神经内科诊所以北的农村地区转诊的患者进行评估。这些指标从相关县进行纵向评估,并评估在地区诊所就诊的患者与在神经内科主治诊所就诊的患者之间的差异:结果:地区诊所开业后,北部各县的转诊量增长速度明显高于服务区域内的其他县。这导致在中心诊所和辐条诊所就诊的患者人数增加。与初级诊所相比,地区诊所接诊的病人病情确实没有那么复杂;但是,初级诊所安排的低复杂性病人的总量并没有减少。两家诊所的取消率和缺席率似乎都没有受到影响:讨论:地区 "辐射 "诊所的开设导致转诊量增加,超出了诊所的接待能力。因此,在中心诊所就诊的来自地区县的患者人数有所增加,从而抵消了改善高复杂性患者就医的潜在益处。讨论了需求塑造和适当利用作为价值等式一部分的重要性,随后讨论了缓解策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Operational Impact of Neurology Rural Access Model: Reflections on the Importance of Demand-Shaping.

Background and objectives: Demand for specialty neurologic care has been steadily increasing over the past several decades, and health systems are needing to meet the demands of their patients while managing a dwindling workforce. This retrospective study investigates the operational impact of a regional neurology clinic staffed by advanced practice providers with remote physician oversight in a "hub and spoke" delivery model to serve lower complexity patients.

Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted to evaluate outcomes. Descriptive analysis of referral volumes, cancellation/no-show rates, and patient complexity as determined by the reason for referral were used to evaluate patients who received referrals from rural counties north of the primary neurology practice before and after the opening of the regional clinic. These metrics were evaluated longitudinally from counties of interest and for differences in patients seen at the regional clinic vs primary neurology practice.

Results: Referral volumes from the northern counties increased at significantly higher rates after the opening of the regional clinic than other counties in the serviced area. This resulted in an increase in patients seen in the hub clinics and spoke clinic. The regional clinic did see patients who were less complex than the primary practice; however, the total volume of low-complexity patients scheduled at the primary practice did not decrease. Cancellation and no-show rates did not seem to be affected in either clinic.

Discussion: The opening of a regional "spoke" clinic resulted in the generation of greater referral volumes that exceeded the capacity created by the clinic. Owing to this, there was an increase in the number of patients seen from the regional counties in the hub clinics, negating the potential benefit of improving access for high-complexity patients. Importance of demand-shaping and appropriate utilization as part of the value equation are discussed, followed by discussion of mitigation strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信