社区姑息关怀:支持性姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT™)希腊语版本。

IF 3 Q1 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Maria Bouri, Evanthia Sakellari, Dimitrios Krentiris, Areti Lagiou
{"title":"社区姑息关怀:支持性姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT™)希腊语版本。","authors":"Maria Bouri, Evanthia Sakellari, Dimitrios Krentiris, Areti Lagiou","doi":"10.1177/21501319241245842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/objectives: </strong>Systematic identification of persons with palliative care needs constitutes a major challenge for promoting palliative care in all levels of the health system, including primary care. The aim of this study was to translate, cross-culturally adapt, and content validate Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT) for use in the Greek primary care context. Secondary objectives were to probe the use of SPICT-GR in exemplary case vignettes, to discuss the clarity and comprehensibility of its content as well as the appropriateness, acceptability, and feasibility of the tool within the Greek primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Greek translation and cross-cultural adaptation of SPICT™ followed World Health Organization recommendations for translation and adaptation of instruments. For this purpose a working group was set up consisting of 2 senior researchers, a primary care professional with postgraduate training in Palliative Medicine and a general practitioner (GP) with special interest in primary palliative care. Three focus groups comprised of health professionals (n = 23) working in primary care settings participated in the pilot testing phase. Participants also completed a questionnaire including rating their perceptions on tool's utility and feasibility as well as on the clarity and relevance of its items. Thematic analysis was used for focus groups discussions on how the tool was perceived and interpreted by health professionals in a Greek healthcare context and descriptive statistics for the quantitative analysis of the questionnaire data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority assessed the tool as useful (65%), considered its implementation in primary care as feasible (91%) and rated its items as \"relevant\" or \"very relevant\" and \"clear\" or \"very clear.\" Three themes emerged from focus groups discussions: <i>Guiding clinical practice and facilitating collaboration; promoting comprehensive care and awareness for palliative care; applicability in and suitability for primary care</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SPICT-GR™ was identified as a practical and applicable tool for primary care, a source of guidance for the comprehensive identification of patients' palliative care needs, promoting awareness on palliative care and facilitating a shared language among health care professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":46723,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","volume":"15 ","pages":"21501319241245842"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11010743/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Palliative Care in the Community: The Greek Version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT™).\",\"authors\":\"Maria Bouri, Evanthia Sakellari, Dimitrios Krentiris, Areti Lagiou\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21501319241245842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction/objectives: </strong>Systematic identification of persons with palliative care needs constitutes a major challenge for promoting palliative care in all levels of the health system, including primary care. The aim of this study was to translate, cross-culturally adapt, and content validate Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT) for use in the Greek primary care context. Secondary objectives were to probe the use of SPICT-GR in exemplary case vignettes, to discuss the clarity and comprehensibility of its content as well as the appropriateness, acceptability, and feasibility of the tool within the Greek primary care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Greek translation and cross-cultural adaptation of SPICT™ followed World Health Organization recommendations for translation and adaptation of instruments. For this purpose a working group was set up consisting of 2 senior researchers, a primary care professional with postgraduate training in Palliative Medicine and a general practitioner (GP) with special interest in primary palliative care. Three focus groups comprised of health professionals (n = 23) working in primary care settings participated in the pilot testing phase. Participants also completed a questionnaire including rating their perceptions on tool's utility and feasibility as well as on the clarity and relevance of its items. Thematic analysis was used for focus groups discussions on how the tool was perceived and interpreted by health professionals in a Greek healthcare context and descriptive statistics for the quantitative analysis of the questionnaire data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority assessed the tool as useful (65%), considered its implementation in primary care as feasible (91%) and rated its items as \\\"relevant\\\" or \\\"very relevant\\\" and \\\"clear\\\" or \\\"very clear.\\\" Three themes emerged from focus groups discussions: <i>Guiding clinical practice and facilitating collaboration; promoting comprehensive care and awareness for palliative care; applicability in and suitability for primary care</i>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SPICT-GR™ was identified as a practical and applicable tool for primary care, a source of guidance for the comprehensive identification of patients' palliative care needs, promoting awareness on palliative care and facilitating a shared language among health care professionals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health\",\"volume\":\"15 \",\"pages\":\"21501319241245842\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11010743/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319241245842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Primary Care and Community Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21501319241245842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言/目标:系统性地识别有姑息关怀需求的人员是在包括初级医疗在内的各级医疗系统中推广姑息关怀的一大挑战。本研究旨在翻译、跨文化改编并验证支持性姑息关怀指标工具(SPICT)的内容,以便在希腊初级医疗机构中使用。次要目标是探究 SPICT-GR 在典型病例中的使用情况,讨论其内容的清晰度和可理解性,以及该工具在希腊初级医疗中的适宜性、可接受性和可行性:SPICT™ 的希腊语翻译和跨文化改编遵循了世界卫生组织关于工具翻译和改编的建议。为此,我们成立了一个工作组,由两名资深研究人员、一名接受过姑息医学研究生培训的初级医疗专业人员和一名对初级姑息治疗有特殊兴趣的全科医生(GP)组成。由在基层医疗机构工作的医疗专业人员(23 人)组成的三个焦点小组参与了试点测试阶段。参与者还填写了一份问卷,包括对工具的实用性和可行性以及项目的清晰度和相关性进行评分。专题分析用于焦点小组讨论,探讨希腊医疗保健环境中的医疗专业人员如何看待和解释该工具;描述性统计用于问卷数据的定量分析:大多数人认为该工具有用(65%),认为在初级保健中实施该工具是可行的(91%),并将其项目评为 "相关 "或 "非常相关 "以及 "清晰 "或 "非常清晰"。焦点小组讨论中出现了三个主题:指导临床实践和促进合作;促进全面关怀和提高对姑息关怀的认识;在初级医疗中的适用性和适宜性:SPICT-GR™被认为是一种实用的、适用于初级医疗的工具,是全面识别病人姑息关怀需求的指导来源,提高了姑息关怀的意识,促进了医护人员之间的共同语言。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Palliative Care in the Community: The Greek Version of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT™).

Introduction/objectives: Systematic identification of persons with palliative care needs constitutes a major challenge for promoting palliative care in all levels of the health system, including primary care. The aim of this study was to translate, cross-culturally adapt, and content validate Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT) for use in the Greek primary care context. Secondary objectives were to probe the use of SPICT-GR in exemplary case vignettes, to discuss the clarity and comprehensibility of its content as well as the appropriateness, acceptability, and feasibility of the tool within the Greek primary care.

Methods: The Greek translation and cross-cultural adaptation of SPICT™ followed World Health Organization recommendations for translation and adaptation of instruments. For this purpose a working group was set up consisting of 2 senior researchers, a primary care professional with postgraduate training in Palliative Medicine and a general practitioner (GP) with special interest in primary palliative care. Three focus groups comprised of health professionals (n = 23) working in primary care settings participated in the pilot testing phase. Participants also completed a questionnaire including rating their perceptions on tool's utility and feasibility as well as on the clarity and relevance of its items. Thematic analysis was used for focus groups discussions on how the tool was perceived and interpreted by health professionals in a Greek healthcare context and descriptive statistics for the quantitative analysis of the questionnaire data.

Results: The majority assessed the tool as useful (65%), considered its implementation in primary care as feasible (91%) and rated its items as "relevant" or "very relevant" and "clear" or "very clear." Three themes emerged from focus groups discussions: Guiding clinical practice and facilitating collaboration; promoting comprehensive care and awareness for palliative care; applicability in and suitability for primary care.

Conclusions: SPICT-GR™ was identified as a practical and applicable tool for primary care, a source of guidance for the comprehensive identification of patients' palliative care needs, promoting awareness on palliative care and facilitating a shared language among health care professionals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信