加利福尼亚州圣克鲁斯市森林管理工人中蜱传疾病的流行率和知识。

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Vector borne and zoonotic diseases Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-29 DOI:10.1089/vbz.2024.0012
Francesca Rubino, Janet Foley
{"title":"加利福尼亚州圣克鲁斯市森林管理工人中蜱传疾病的流行率和知识。","authors":"Francesca Rubino, Janet Foley","doi":"10.1089/vbz.2024.0012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> In Lyme-endemic areas, limited research has investigated the risk of tick-borne diseases among frontline workers in fire management. This study aimed to compare the exposure histories to ticks and tick-borne pathogens, knowledge, and prevention practices between individuals engaged in fire-related forest management and those participating in recreational activities within Santa Cruz County, CA, in an area of high risk of tick exposure. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Blood samples from 55 forest workers and 58 members of the public were tested for bacterial DNA of and antibodies to <i>Borrelia burgdorferi</i>, <i>Anaplasma phagocytophilum</i>, and <i>Rickettsia</i> species. In addition, a questionnaire was administered to 54 workers and 84 members of the public to identify gaps in knowledge and prevention practices. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Although workers had a higher percentage of positive <i>B. burgdorferi</i> antibodies than the public (5.5% compared with 1.7%), the difference was not statistically significant. Conversely, rickettsial antibodies were more prevalent among the public (17.2% versus 3.6% for workers), but specificity to pathogenic bacteria could not be confirmed. No DNA for the three pathogens or antibodies against <i>A. phagocytophilum</i> were detected. Many workers and members of the public reported tick bites (67.4% of participants), with a notable 11% increase among workers in the odds of being bitten for each additional year spent working in forests. Although workers took greater precautions, significant knowledge and practice gaps were identified among both populations, such as an inability to distinguish tick species from common arthropods (mites, spiders, fleas), overestimating the size of ticks, and inappropriate tick-removal techniques. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This study underscores the risk of tick-borne diseases faced by fire management workers in Lyme disease-endemic regions. The findings emphasize the necessity for future studies of Lyme disease within this population, and highlight the urgent need for enhanced training programs to minimize these risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":23683,"journal":{"name":"Vector borne and zoonotic diseases","volume":" ","pages":"745-752"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence and Knowledge of Tick-Borne Disease Among Forest Management Workers in Santa Cruz, California.\",\"authors\":\"Francesca Rubino, Janet Foley\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/vbz.2024.0012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> In Lyme-endemic areas, limited research has investigated the risk of tick-borne diseases among frontline workers in fire management. This study aimed to compare the exposure histories to ticks and tick-borne pathogens, knowledge, and prevention practices between individuals engaged in fire-related forest management and those participating in recreational activities within Santa Cruz County, CA, in an area of high risk of tick exposure. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Blood samples from 55 forest workers and 58 members of the public were tested for bacterial DNA of and antibodies to <i>Borrelia burgdorferi</i>, <i>Anaplasma phagocytophilum</i>, and <i>Rickettsia</i> species. In addition, a questionnaire was administered to 54 workers and 84 members of the public to identify gaps in knowledge and prevention practices. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Although workers had a higher percentage of positive <i>B. burgdorferi</i> antibodies than the public (5.5% compared with 1.7%), the difference was not statistically significant. Conversely, rickettsial antibodies were more prevalent among the public (17.2% versus 3.6% for workers), but specificity to pathogenic bacteria could not be confirmed. No DNA for the three pathogens or antibodies against <i>A. phagocytophilum</i> were detected. Many workers and members of the public reported tick bites (67.4% of participants), with a notable 11% increase among workers in the odds of being bitten for each additional year spent working in forests. Although workers took greater precautions, significant knowledge and practice gaps were identified among both populations, such as an inability to distinguish tick species from common arthropods (mites, spiders, fleas), overestimating the size of ticks, and inappropriate tick-removal techniques. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> This study underscores the risk of tick-borne diseases faced by fire management workers in Lyme disease-endemic regions. The findings emphasize the necessity for future studies of Lyme disease within this population, and highlight the urgent need for enhanced training programs to minimize these risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vector borne and zoonotic diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"745-752\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vector borne and zoonotic diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2024.0012\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vector borne and zoonotic diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2024.0012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在莱姆病流行的地区,对火灾管理一线工作人员蜱媒疾病风险的调查十分有限。本研究旨在比较加利福尼亚州圣克鲁斯县(蜱虫暴露高风险地区)从事与火灾相关的森林管理的人员和参与娱乐活动的人员的蜱虫和蜱虫病原体暴露史、知识和预防措施。研究方法对 55 名森林工作者和 58 名公众的血液样本进行了细菌 DNA 检测,并检测了鲍曼不动杆菌、噬细胞无形体和立克次体的抗体。此外,还对 54 名工人和 84 名公众进行了问卷调查,以确定他们在知识和预防方法方面的差距。结果:虽然工人的勃氏菌抗体阳性率高于公众(5.5% 比 1.7%),但两者之间的差异并无统计学意义。相反,立克次体抗体在公众中更普遍(17.2%,而工人为 3.6%),但对致病菌的特异性无法确认。没有检测到三种病原体的 DNA 或噬菌体抗体。许多工人和公众都报告了被蜱虫叮咬的情况(67.4% 的参与者),在森林中工作每增加一年,工人被叮咬的几率就会明显增加 11%。虽然工人采取了更多的预防措施,但在这两个人群中都发现了明显的知识和实践差距,例如无法区分蜱虫种类和常见节肢动物(螨虫、蜘蛛、跳蚤)、高估蜱虫的大小以及不恰当的除蜱技术。结论这项研究强调了莱姆病流行地区消防管理人员面临的蜱传疾病风险。研究结果强调了今后在这一人群中开展莱姆病研究的必要性,并突出了加强培训计划以最大限度降低这些风险的迫切需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence and Knowledge of Tick-Borne Disease Among Forest Management Workers in Santa Cruz, California.

Background: In Lyme-endemic areas, limited research has investigated the risk of tick-borne diseases among frontline workers in fire management. This study aimed to compare the exposure histories to ticks and tick-borne pathogens, knowledge, and prevention practices between individuals engaged in fire-related forest management and those participating in recreational activities within Santa Cruz County, CA, in an area of high risk of tick exposure. Methods: Blood samples from 55 forest workers and 58 members of the public were tested for bacterial DNA of and antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, and Rickettsia species. In addition, a questionnaire was administered to 54 workers and 84 members of the public to identify gaps in knowledge and prevention practices. Results: Although workers had a higher percentage of positive B. burgdorferi antibodies than the public (5.5% compared with 1.7%), the difference was not statistically significant. Conversely, rickettsial antibodies were more prevalent among the public (17.2% versus 3.6% for workers), but specificity to pathogenic bacteria could not be confirmed. No DNA for the three pathogens or antibodies against A. phagocytophilum were detected. Many workers and members of the public reported tick bites (67.4% of participants), with a notable 11% increase among workers in the odds of being bitten for each additional year spent working in forests. Although workers took greater precautions, significant knowledge and practice gaps were identified among both populations, such as an inability to distinguish tick species from common arthropods (mites, spiders, fleas), overestimating the size of ticks, and inappropriate tick-removal techniques. Conclusion: This study underscores the risk of tick-borne diseases faced by fire management workers in Lyme disease-endemic regions. The findings emphasize the necessity for future studies of Lyme disease within this population, and highlight the urgent need for enhanced training programs to minimize these risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
73
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases is an authoritative, peer-reviewed journal providing basic and applied research on diseases transmitted to humans by invertebrate vectors or non-human vertebrates. The Journal examines geographic, seasonal, and other risk factors that influence the transmission, diagnosis, management, and prevention of this group of infectious diseases, and identifies global trends that have the potential to result in major epidemics. Vector-Borne and Zoonotic Diseases coverage includes: -Ecology -Entomology -Epidemiology -Infectious diseases -Microbiology -Parasitology -Pathology -Public health -Tropical medicine -Wildlife biology -Bacterial, rickettsial, viral, and parasitic zoonoses
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信