改善急性评估病房遥测技术的使用。

Q3 Medicine
Acute Medicine Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.52964/AMJA.0969
Patrick Timmons, Lindsay Reid, Kathleen Clare, Daniel Beckett, Tegan Thomson, Lisa Fabisiak
{"title":"改善急性评估病房遥测技术的使用。","authors":"Patrick Timmons, Lindsay Reid, Kathleen Clare, Daniel Beckett, Tegan Thomson, Lisa Fabisiak","doi":"10.52964/AMJA.0969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Despite published guidelines, telemetry use is inappropriate in 25-43% of cases. This impacts patient safety and telemetry effectiveness. QI methodology was used to review telemetry in a hospital acute medical unit with the aim of reducing inappropriate use and addressing alarm fatigue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 'Telemetry Indication Form' was created. Eight weeks of baseline data was collated before introducing the 'Indication Form'. Four plan-do-study-act cycles were conducted. At each cycle, data was analysed using statistical process control charts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inappropriate telemetry use significantly reduced from 32% to 4%. Total telemetry use also fell. Unfortunately, interventions to address alarm rates did not result in significant reduction in false alarms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A 'Telemetry Indication Form' has significant potential to improve patient safety through reducing inappropriate use.</p>","PeriodicalId":39743,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"24-36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving Telemetry use in the Acute Assessment Unit.\",\"authors\":\"Patrick Timmons, Lindsay Reid, Kathleen Clare, Daniel Beckett, Tegan Thomson, Lisa Fabisiak\",\"doi\":\"10.52964/AMJA.0969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Despite published guidelines, telemetry use is inappropriate in 25-43% of cases. This impacts patient safety and telemetry effectiveness. QI methodology was used to review telemetry in a hospital acute medical unit with the aim of reducing inappropriate use and addressing alarm fatigue.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 'Telemetry Indication Form' was created. Eight weeks of baseline data was collated before introducing the 'Indication Form'. Four plan-do-study-act cycles were conducted. At each cycle, data was analysed using statistical process control charts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Inappropriate telemetry use significantly reduced from 32% to 4%. Total telemetry use also fell. Unfortunately, interventions to address alarm rates did not result in significant reduction in false alarms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A 'Telemetry Indication Form' has significant potential to improve patient safety through reducing inappropriate use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39743,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acute Medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"24-36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acute Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52964/AMJA.0969\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52964/AMJA.0969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:尽管发布了相关指南,但仍有 25%-43% 的病例不适合使用遥测技术。这影响了患者安全和遥测的有效性。我们采用 QI 方法对一家医院急诊科的遥测技术进行了审查,旨在减少不适当的使用并解决警报疲劳问题:方法:制作了一份 "遥测指示表"。方法:制作了 "遥测指示表",并在引入 "指示表 "前整理了八周的基线数据。共进行了四个计划-实施-研究-行动周期。每个周期都使用统计过程控制图对数据进行分析:结果:遥测技术的不当使用率从 32% 显著降至 4%。遥测总使用率也有所下降。遗憾的是,针对警报率的干预措施并未显著降低误报率:结论:"遥测指示表 "在通过减少不当使用来提高患者安全方面具有巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving Telemetry use in the Acute Assessment Unit.

Background and aims: Despite published guidelines, telemetry use is inappropriate in 25-43% of cases. This impacts patient safety and telemetry effectiveness. QI methodology was used to review telemetry in a hospital acute medical unit with the aim of reducing inappropriate use and addressing alarm fatigue.

Methods: A 'Telemetry Indication Form' was created. Eight weeks of baseline data was collated before introducing the 'Indication Form'. Four plan-do-study-act cycles were conducted. At each cycle, data was analysed using statistical process control charts.

Results: Inappropriate telemetry use significantly reduced from 32% to 4%. Total telemetry use also fell. Unfortunately, interventions to address alarm rates did not result in significant reduction in false alarms.

Conclusions: A 'Telemetry Indication Form' has significant potential to improve patient safety through reducing inappropriate use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acute Medicine
Acute Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: These are usually commissioned by the editorial team in accordance with a cycle running over several years. Authors wishing to submit a review relevant to Acute Medicine are advised to contact the editor before writing this. Unsolicited review articles received for consideration may be included if the subject matter is considered of interest to the readership, provided the topic has not already been covered in a recent edition. Review articles are usually 3000-5000 words and may include tables, pictures and other figures as required for the text. Include 3 or 4 ‘key points’ summarising the main teaching messages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信