R A Shreenidhi, Reeta Mahey, Monika Rajput, Rohitha Cheluvaraju, Ashish D Upadhyay, Jai Bhagwan Sharma, Garima Kachhawa, Neerja Bhatla
{"title":"用内脏脂肪指数和脂质堆积产物来界定亚洲印度妇女代谢不健康的多囊卵巢综合征--一项横断面研究。","authors":"R A Shreenidhi, Reeta Mahey, Monika Rajput, Rohitha Cheluvaraju, Ashish D Upadhyay, Jai Bhagwan Sharma, Garima Kachhawa, Neerja Bhatla","doi":"10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_14_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) women are at risk of developing diabetes, cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome (MetS) due to insulin resistance (IR) and hyperandrogenism (HA). Both visceral adiposity index (VAI) and lipid accumulation product (LAP) are simple outpatient department-based metric tools that have been introduced to screen PCOS women who are metabolically unhealthy and are at risk of development of MetS.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate VAI and LAP in women with PCOS and to correlate them with metabolic and endocrine markers. The study also assessed these parameters amongst different PCOS phenotypes and determined their usefulness to define metabolically healthy PCOS (MH-PCOS) and metabolically unhealthy PCOS (MU-PCOS).</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>The design of the study was a cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two hundred PCOS women were included in the study, and all the clinical, anthropometric, hormonal, biochemical and metabolic markers were assessed. The cohort was divided into MH-PCOS and MU-PCOS by the modified National Cholesterol Education Programme criteria. VAI and LAP were calculated and correlated with clinical, endocrine and metabolic parameters.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to study the independent role of VAI and LAP to predict MetS. Adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios were calculated. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was done to define cut-offs in Asian Indian women.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VAI and LAP had good ability to correctly discriminate MU-PCOS from MH-PCOS (area under the curve [AUC] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.89 [0.82-0.95]) and (AUC [95% CI [0.81-0.92] =0.86) using ROC, respectively. The sensitivity of VAI and LAP corresponding to the optimal cut-off of ≥2.76 and ≥48.06 (Youden) was 84.09% and 79.55%, respectively. Similarly, the specificity of VAI and LAP was 85.26% and 79.49%, respectively. VAI has a positive predictive value of 61.7% (95% CI [23.7%-40.3%]) and a negative predictive value of 95% (95% CI [88%-99.1%]). LAP has a positive predictive value of 53% (95% CI [40.3%-65.4%]) and a negative predictive value of 93.3% (95% CI [87.6%-96.9%]). PCOS women having VAI ≥ 2.76 had 19.3 times ([95% CI: 6.50-57.70]) more chance of developing MetS. PCOS women having LAP (≥48.06) have 3.7 times ([95% CI: 1.35-10.60]) more odds. There was no difference between ROC curves of VAI and LAP (<i>P</i> = 0.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VAI cut-off ≥ 2.76 and LAP with a cut-off of ≥ 48.06 may be used as markers for predicting MetS amongst PCOS women.</p>","PeriodicalId":15975,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences","volume":"17 1","pages":"50-57"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11041319/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of Visceral Adiposity Index and Lipid Accumulation Products to Define Metabolically-Unhealthy Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Asian Indian Women - A Cross Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"R A Shreenidhi, Reeta Mahey, Monika Rajput, Rohitha Cheluvaraju, Ashish D Upadhyay, Jai Bhagwan Sharma, Garima Kachhawa, Neerja Bhatla\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_14_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) women are at risk of developing diabetes, cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome (MetS) due to insulin resistance (IR) and hyperandrogenism (HA). Both visceral adiposity index (VAI) and lipid accumulation product (LAP) are simple outpatient department-based metric tools that have been introduced to screen PCOS women who are metabolically unhealthy and are at risk of development of MetS.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of the study was to evaluate VAI and LAP in women with PCOS and to correlate them with metabolic and endocrine markers. The study also assessed these parameters amongst different PCOS phenotypes and determined their usefulness to define metabolically healthy PCOS (MH-PCOS) and metabolically unhealthy PCOS (MU-PCOS).</p><p><strong>Settings and design: </strong>The design of the study was a cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Two hundred PCOS women were included in the study, and all the clinical, anthropometric, hormonal, biochemical and metabolic markers were assessed. The cohort was divided into MH-PCOS and MU-PCOS by the modified National Cholesterol Education Programme criteria. VAI and LAP were calculated and correlated with clinical, endocrine and metabolic parameters.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis used: </strong>Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to study the independent role of VAI and LAP to predict MetS. Adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios were calculated. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was done to define cut-offs in Asian Indian women.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>VAI and LAP had good ability to correctly discriminate MU-PCOS from MH-PCOS (area under the curve [AUC] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.89 [0.82-0.95]) and (AUC [95% CI [0.81-0.92] =0.86) using ROC, respectively. The sensitivity of VAI and LAP corresponding to the optimal cut-off of ≥2.76 and ≥48.06 (Youden) was 84.09% and 79.55%, respectively. Similarly, the specificity of VAI and LAP was 85.26% and 79.49%, respectively. VAI has a positive predictive value of 61.7% (95% CI [23.7%-40.3%]) and a negative predictive value of 95% (95% CI [88%-99.1%]). LAP has a positive predictive value of 53% (95% CI [40.3%-65.4%]) and a negative predictive value of 93.3% (95% CI [87.6%-96.9%]). PCOS women having VAI ≥ 2.76 had 19.3 times ([95% CI: 6.50-57.70]) more chance of developing MetS. PCOS women having LAP (≥48.06) have 3.7 times ([95% CI: 1.35-10.60]) more odds. There was no difference between ROC curves of VAI and LAP (<i>P</i> = 0.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>VAI cut-off ≥ 2.76 and LAP with a cut-off of ≥ 48.06 may be used as markers for predicting MetS amongst PCOS women.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"50-57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11041319/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_14_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/3/28 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_14_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:由于胰岛素抵抗(IR)和高雄激素(HA),多囊卵巢综合征(PCOS)妇女有患糖尿病、心血管疾病和代谢综合征(MetS)的风险。内脏脂肪指数(VAI)和脂质堆积产物(LAP)都是基于门诊部门的简单度量工具,已被引入用于筛查代谢不健康和有发展成代谢综合征风险的多囊卵巢综合征妇女。该研究还评估了不同多囊卵巢综合征表型中的这些参数,并确定它们是否有助于界定代谢健康型多囊卵巢综合征(MH-PCOS)和代谢不健康型多囊卵巢综合征(MU-PCOS):研究设计为横断面研究:研究纳入了 200 名多囊卵巢综合征女性,并对所有临床、人体测量、激素、生化和代谢指标进行了评估。根据美国国家胆固醇教育计划的修订标准,将研究对象分为多囊卵巢综合征(MH-PCOS)和多囊卵巢综合征(MU-PCOS)。计算了 VAI 和 LAP,并将其与临床、内分泌和代谢参数相关联:采用单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析来研究 VAI 和 LAP 在预测 MetS 方面的独立作用。计算了调整和未调整的几率比。结果显示,VAI和LAP具有很好的预测MetS的能力:结果:VAI 和 LAP 具有很好的正确区分 MU-PCOS 和 MH-PCOS 的能力(曲线下面积 [AUC] [95% 置信区间 (CI)]:0.89[0.82-0.95])和(AUC [95% CI [0.81-0.92] =0.86)。与≥2.76和≥48.06(Youden)的最佳临界值相对应,VAI和LAP的灵敏度分别为84.09%和79.55%。同样,VAI 和 LAP 的特异性分别为 85.26% 和 79.49%。VAI 的阳性预测值为 61.7%(95% CI [23.7%-40.3%]),阴性预测值为 95%(95% CI [88%-99.1%])。LAP 的阳性预测值为 53%(95% CI [40.3%-65.4%]),阴性预测值为 93.3%(95% CI [87.6%-96.9%])。VAI≥2.76的多囊卵巢综合征女性患MetS的几率是其他女性的19.3倍([95% CI:6.50-57.70])。LAP(≥48.06)的多囊卵巢综合征女性患 MetS 的几率是其他女性的 3.7 倍([95% CI:1.35-10.60])。VAI和LAP的ROC曲线无差异(P = 0.32):结论:VAI 临界值≥ 2.76 和 LAP 临界值≥ 48.06 可作为预测多囊卵巢综合征女性 MetS 的指标。
Utility of Visceral Adiposity Index and Lipid Accumulation Products to Define Metabolically-Unhealthy Polycystic Ovary Syndrome in Asian Indian Women - A Cross Sectional Study.
Background: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) women are at risk of developing diabetes, cardiovascular disease and metabolic syndrome (MetS) due to insulin resistance (IR) and hyperandrogenism (HA). Both visceral adiposity index (VAI) and lipid accumulation product (LAP) are simple outpatient department-based metric tools that have been introduced to screen PCOS women who are metabolically unhealthy and are at risk of development of MetS.
Aims: The aim of the study was to evaluate VAI and LAP in women with PCOS and to correlate them with metabolic and endocrine markers. The study also assessed these parameters amongst different PCOS phenotypes and determined their usefulness to define metabolically healthy PCOS (MH-PCOS) and metabolically unhealthy PCOS (MU-PCOS).
Settings and design: The design of the study was a cross-sectional study.
Materials and methods: Two hundred PCOS women were included in the study, and all the clinical, anthropometric, hormonal, biochemical and metabolic markers were assessed. The cohort was divided into MH-PCOS and MU-PCOS by the modified National Cholesterol Education Programme criteria. VAI and LAP were calculated and correlated with clinical, endocrine and metabolic parameters.
Statistical analysis used: Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to study the independent role of VAI and LAP to predict MetS. Adjusted and unadjusted odds ratios were calculated. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was done to define cut-offs in Asian Indian women.
Results: VAI and LAP had good ability to correctly discriminate MU-PCOS from MH-PCOS (area under the curve [AUC] [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.89 [0.82-0.95]) and (AUC [95% CI [0.81-0.92] =0.86) using ROC, respectively. The sensitivity of VAI and LAP corresponding to the optimal cut-off of ≥2.76 and ≥48.06 (Youden) was 84.09% and 79.55%, respectively. Similarly, the specificity of VAI and LAP was 85.26% and 79.49%, respectively. VAI has a positive predictive value of 61.7% (95% CI [23.7%-40.3%]) and a negative predictive value of 95% (95% CI [88%-99.1%]). LAP has a positive predictive value of 53% (95% CI [40.3%-65.4%]) and a negative predictive value of 93.3% (95% CI [87.6%-96.9%]). PCOS women having VAI ≥ 2.76 had 19.3 times ([95% CI: 6.50-57.70]) more chance of developing MetS. PCOS women having LAP (≥48.06) have 3.7 times ([95% CI: 1.35-10.60]) more odds. There was no difference between ROC curves of VAI and LAP (P = 0.32).
Conclusion: VAI cut-off ≥ 2.76 and LAP with a cut-off of ≥ 48.06 may be used as markers for predicting MetS amongst PCOS women.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Human Reproductive Sciences (JHRS) (ISSN:0974-1208) a Quarterly peer-reviewed international journal is being launched in January 2008 under the auspices of Indian Society of Assisted Reproduction. The journal will cover all aspects human reproduction including Andrology, Assisted conception, Endocrinology, Physiology and Pathology, Implantation, Preimplantation Diagnosis, Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis, Embryology as well as Ethical, Legal and Social issues. The journal will publish peer-reviewed original research papers, case reports, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and debates.