同伴辅助学习与教师指导面试技巧教学的比较研究:比较研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Indian pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-08-15 Epub Date: 2024-04-05
Sameerah Abdulrahman, Nazdar Ezzaddin Alkhateeb, Samir Mahmood Othman
{"title":"同伴辅助学习与教师指导面试技巧教学的比较研究:比较研究。","authors":"Sameerah Abdulrahman, Nazdar Ezzaddin Alkhateeb, Samir Mahmood Othman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of peer-assisted learning (PAL) on students' proficiency in patient interviewing skills and to explore medical students' perception on peer tutors in educational setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional observational study was performed in the College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq, between September 2021 and November 2021. The participants included second year medical students who were attending the Integrated Basic Sciences (IBS) module. The peer tutors were chosen from a group of sixth year medical students who had completed an intensive 18-hour communication skills course. The summative video assessment marks of study participants and their perceptions on the process were compared between the faculty-led group and the peer-assisted learning (PAL) group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Peer-assisted learning group (n = 83) had significantly higher mean (SD) scores compared to those in the faculty-led group (n = 92), [74.6 (8.1) vs 70.4 (7.1), P < 0.001]. Encouraging feedback was received from students regarding the PAL sessions with the most positive feedback regarding the ease in asking questions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Peer-assisted learning improved students' performance in patient interviewing skills and fostered positive perceptions of the learning experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":13291,"journal":{"name":"Indian pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"735-739"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peer-Assisted Learning Versus Faculty-Led Teaching of Interviewing Skills: A Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sameerah Abdulrahman, Nazdar Ezzaddin Alkhateeb, Samir Mahmood Othman\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the impact of peer-assisted learning (PAL) on students' proficiency in patient interviewing skills and to explore medical students' perception on peer tutors in educational setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional observational study was performed in the College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq, between September 2021 and November 2021. The participants included second year medical students who were attending the Integrated Basic Sciences (IBS) module. The peer tutors were chosen from a group of sixth year medical students who had completed an intensive 18-hour communication skills course. The summative video assessment marks of study participants and their perceptions on the process were compared between the faculty-led group and the peer-assisted learning (PAL) group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Peer-assisted learning group (n = 83) had significantly higher mean (SD) scores compared to those in the faculty-led group (n = 92), [74.6 (8.1) vs 70.4 (7.1), P < 0.001]. Encouraging feedback was received from students regarding the PAL sessions with the most positive feedback regarding the ease in asking questions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Peer-assisted learning improved students' performance in patient interviewing skills and fostered positive perceptions of the learning experience.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"735-739\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估同伴辅助学习(PAL)对学生熟练掌握病人问诊技能的影响,并探讨医学生对教育环境中同伴辅导员的看法:一项横断面观察研究于 2021 年 9 月至 2021 年 11 月在伊拉克埃尔比勒霍勒医科大学医学院进行。参与者包括参加综合基础科学(IBS)模块的二年级医学生。朋辈辅导员是从完成了 18 小时沟通技巧强化课程的六年级医学生中挑选出来的。研究人员比较了教师指导小组和同伴辅助学习(PAL)小组的终结性视频评估分数以及他们对这一过程的看法:同伴辅助学习组(n = 83)的平均分(标清)明显高于教师指导组(n = 92)[74.6 (8.1) vs 70.4 (7.1), P ˂0.001]。学生们对 PAL 课程的反馈令人鼓舞,其中最积极的反馈来自于提问的轻松程度:结论:同伴互助学习提高了学生在病人访谈技能方面的表现,并培养了学生对学习体验的积极看法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peer-Assisted Learning Versus Faculty-Led Teaching of Interviewing Skills: A Comparative Study.

Objective: To assess the impact of peer-assisted learning (PAL) on students' proficiency in patient interviewing skills and to explore medical students' perception on peer tutors in educational setting.

Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was performed in the College of Medicine, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq, between September 2021 and November 2021. The participants included second year medical students who were attending the Integrated Basic Sciences (IBS) module. The peer tutors were chosen from a group of sixth year medical students who had completed an intensive 18-hour communication skills course. The summative video assessment marks of study participants and their perceptions on the process were compared between the faculty-led group and the peer-assisted learning (PAL) group.

Results: Peer-assisted learning group (n = 83) had significantly higher mean (SD) scores compared to those in the faculty-led group (n = 92), [74.6 (8.1) vs 70.4 (7.1), P < 0.001]. Encouraging feedback was received from students regarding the PAL sessions with the most positive feedback regarding the ease in asking questions.

Conclusion: Peer-assisted learning improved students' performance in patient interviewing skills and fostered positive perceptions of the learning experience.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian pediatrics
Indian pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
344
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The general objective of Indian Pediatrics is "To promote the science and practice of Pediatrics." An important guiding principle has been the simultaneous need to inform, educate and entertain the target audience. The specific key objectives are: -To publish original, relevant, well researched peer reviewed articles on issues related to child health. -To provide continuing education to support informed clinical decisions and research. -To foster responsible and balanced debate on controversial issues that affect child health, including non-clinical areas such as medical education, ethics, law, environment and economics. -To achieve the highest level of ethical medical journalism and to produce a publication that is timely, credible and enjoyable to read.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信