{"title":"基于肺癌手术时间增强曲线的肺动静脉分隔计算机断层扫描方案的开发","authors":"Masato Kiriki, Masashi Koizumi, Katsuhiko Maeda, Toshiyuki Sakai, Noriko Kotoura","doi":"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We devised a split-bolus injection and imaging protocol for pulmonary artery and vein separation computed tomography (CT) angiography based on time enhancement curve characterization. Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate the contrast enhancement effect and success rate of blood vessel separation between the pulmonary artery and vein of this proposed protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 102 patients (45 patients with the standard protocol and 57 patients with the proposed protocol) who underwent pulmonary arteriovenous computed tomography angiography were included. The CT values of various vessels, CT value difference between the pulmonary trunk and left atrium, and coefficient of variation in pulmonary arteries and veins were obtained from images of the standard and proposed protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CT values in the proposed protocol for the pulmonary trunk were significantly higher than those in the standard protocol (487.3 [415.5-546.9] HU vs. 293.0 [259.0-350.0] HU, P < 0.01). The CT value difference between the pulmonary trunk and left atrium in the proposed protocol was significantly higher than that in the conventional protocol (211.3 [158.0-265.7] HU vs. 32 [-30.0-55.0] HU, P < 0.01). The coefficient of variation in the proposed protocol was 0.08 (0.06-0.10) and 0.09 (0.08-0.11) in pulmonary arteries and 0.08 (0.06-0.09) and 0.09 (0.07-0.12) in pulmonary veins, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed protocol achieved separation between the pulmonary artery and vein in many patients, making it useful for the preoperative assessment of individual thoracic anatomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":15402,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","volume":" ","pages":"914-920"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of the Split-Bolus Pulmonary Arteriovenous Separating Computed Tomography Angiography Protocol Based on Time Enhancement Curve for Lung Cancer Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Masato Kiriki, Masashi Koizumi, Katsuhiko Maeda, Toshiyuki Sakai, Noriko Kotoura\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RCT.0000000000001621\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We devised a split-bolus injection and imaging protocol for pulmonary artery and vein separation computed tomography (CT) angiography based on time enhancement curve characterization. Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate the contrast enhancement effect and success rate of blood vessel separation between the pulmonary artery and vein of this proposed protocol.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this study, 102 patients (45 patients with the standard protocol and 57 patients with the proposed protocol) who underwent pulmonary arteriovenous computed tomography angiography were included. The CT values of various vessels, CT value difference between the pulmonary trunk and left atrium, and coefficient of variation in pulmonary arteries and veins were obtained from images of the standard and proposed protocols.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CT values in the proposed protocol for the pulmonary trunk were significantly higher than those in the standard protocol (487.3 [415.5-546.9] HU vs. 293.0 [259.0-350.0] HU, P < 0.01). The CT value difference between the pulmonary trunk and left atrium in the proposed protocol was significantly higher than that in the conventional protocol (211.3 [158.0-265.7] HU vs. 32 [-30.0-55.0] HU, P < 0.01). The coefficient of variation in the proposed protocol was 0.08 (0.06-0.10) and 0.09 (0.08-0.11) in pulmonary arteries and 0.08 (0.06-0.09) and 0.09 (0.07-0.12) in pulmonary veins, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The proposed protocol achieved separation between the pulmonary artery and vein in many patients, making it useful for the preoperative assessment of individual thoracic anatomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"914-920\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001621\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RCT.0000000000001621","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:根据时间增强曲线特征,我们设计了一种用于肺动脉和静脉分离计算机断层扫描(CT)血管造影的分次注射和成像方案。此外,我们还旨在评估该方案的对比度增强效果和肺动脉与静脉血管分离的成功率:本研究共纳入 102 例接受肺动静脉计算机断层扫描的患者(45 例采用标准方案,57 例采用建议方案)。从标准和建议方案的图像中获得各种血管的 CT 值、肺动脉干和左心房的 CT 值差异以及肺动脉和静脉的变异系数:建议方案的肺动脉干 CT 值明显高于标准方案(487.3 [415.5-546.9] HU vs. 293.0 [259.0-350.0] HU,P <0.01)。建议方案中肺动脉干和左心房的 CT 值差异明显高于常规方案(211.3 [158.0-265.7] HU vs. 32 [-30.0-55.0] HU,P <0.01)。在拟议方案中,肺动脉的变异系数分别为 0.08(0.06-0.10)和 0.09(0.08-0.11),肺静脉的变异系数分别为 0.08(0.06-0.09)和 0.09(0.07-0.12):结论:所提出的方案在许多患者中实现了肺动脉和肺静脉的分离,有助于术前评估个体胸部解剖结构。
Development of the Split-Bolus Pulmonary Arteriovenous Separating Computed Tomography Angiography Protocol Based on Time Enhancement Curve for Lung Cancer Surgery.
Objective: We devised a split-bolus injection and imaging protocol for pulmonary artery and vein separation computed tomography (CT) angiography based on time enhancement curve characterization. Furthermore, we aimed to evaluate the contrast enhancement effect and success rate of blood vessel separation between the pulmonary artery and vein of this proposed protocol.
Methods: In this study, 102 patients (45 patients with the standard protocol and 57 patients with the proposed protocol) who underwent pulmonary arteriovenous computed tomography angiography were included. The CT values of various vessels, CT value difference between the pulmonary trunk and left atrium, and coefficient of variation in pulmonary arteries and veins were obtained from images of the standard and proposed protocols.
Results: The CT values in the proposed protocol for the pulmonary trunk were significantly higher than those in the standard protocol (487.3 [415.5-546.9] HU vs. 293.0 [259.0-350.0] HU, P < 0.01). The CT value difference between the pulmonary trunk and left atrium in the proposed protocol was significantly higher than that in the conventional protocol (211.3 [158.0-265.7] HU vs. 32 [-30.0-55.0] HU, P < 0.01). The coefficient of variation in the proposed protocol was 0.08 (0.06-0.10) and 0.09 (0.08-0.11) in pulmonary arteries and 0.08 (0.06-0.09) and 0.09 (0.07-0.12) in pulmonary veins, respectively.
Conclusions: The proposed protocol achieved separation between the pulmonary artery and vein in many patients, making it useful for the preoperative assessment of individual thoracic anatomy.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography is to showcase the latest clinical and research developments in CT, MR, and closely related diagnostic techniques. We encourage submission of both original research and review articles that have immediate or promissory clinical applications. Topics of special interest include: 1) functional MR and CT of the brain and body; 2) advanced/innovative MRI techniques (diffusion, perfusion, rapid scanning); and 3) advanced/innovative CT techniques (perfusion, multi-energy, dose-reduction, and processing).