评估钆喷酸醇在健康兔子和猪磁共振血管造影中的对比增强性能

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Investigative Radiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1097/RLI.0000000000001083
Gaëlle Hugon, Hans Adriaensen, Mélody Wintrebert, Laurent Arnould, Jean-Michel Serfaty, Philippe Robert
{"title":"评估钆喷酸醇在健康兔子和猪磁共振血管造影中的对比增强性能","authors":"Gaëlle Hugon, Hans Adriaensen, Mélody Wintrebert, Laurent Arnould, Jean-Michel Serfaty, Philippe Robert","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Unexpected accumulations of gadolinium in various organs were reported after the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents, making desirable to reduce the dose while maintaining equivalent diagnostic performance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contrast enhancement performance of high relaxivity gadopiclenol compared with gadoterate meglumine in abdominal contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In a first study in healthy rabbits, axial 3D gradient echo sequences were applied at 4.7 T to study arterial enhancement as a function of gadopiclenol dose (0.025, 0.05, 0.075, and 0.1 mmol Gd/kg) or gadoterate meglumine at 0.1 mmol Gd/kg (n = 5-6/group). The increase in signal-to-noise ratio (ΔSNR) in the aorta at the first pass was measured and compared. In a second, crossover study in 6 healthy pigs, abdominal CE-MRA sequences were acquired at 3 T with gadopiclenol at 0.05 mmol Gd/kg or gadoterate meglumine at 0.1 mmol Gd/kg at a 1-week interval. Quantitatively on the maximum intensity projection (MIP) images, the mean MIP SNR within the aorta of both groups was compared. Qualitatively, a blinded comparison of the angiograms was performed by an experienced radiologist to determine the preferred contrast agent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the rabbit, ∆SNR is linearly correlated with the gadopiclenol dose ( P = 0.0010). Compared with gadoterate meglumine 0.1 mmol Gd/kg, an increase in the ∆SNR is observed after 0.05, 0.075, and 0.1 mmol Gd/kg of gadopiclenol (+63% P = 0.0731, +78% P = 0.0081, and +72% P = 0.0773, respectively), whereas at 0.025 mmol Gd/kg, ∆SNR is in the same range as with gadoterate meglumine 0.1 mmol Gd/kg (+15% P > 0.9999). In pigs, contrast enhancement after gadopiclenol at 0.05 mmol/kg is +22% superior to MIP SNR after gadoterate meglumine at 0.1 mmol Gd/kg ( P = 0.3095). Qualitatively, a preference was shown for gadopiclenol images (3/6) over the gadoterate meglumine examinations (1/6), with no preference being shown for the remainder (2/6).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>First-pass CE-MRA is feasible with gadopiclenol at 0.05 mmol Gd/kg with at least the same arterial signal enhancement and image quality as gadoterate meglumine at 0.1 mmol Gd/kg.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the Contrast Enhancement Performance of Gadopiclenol for Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Healthy Rabbits and Pigs.\",\"authors\":\"Gaëlle Hugon, Hans Adriaensen, Mélody Wintrebert, Laurent Arnould, Jean-Michel Serfaty, Philippe Robert\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001083\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Unexpected accumulations of gadolinium in various organs were reported after the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents, making desirable to reduce the dose while maintaining equivalent diagnostic performance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contrast enhancement performance of high relaxivity gadopiclenol compared with gadoterate meglumine in abdominal contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In a first study in healthy rabbits, axial 3D gradient echo sequences were applied at 4.7 T to study arterial enhancement as a function of gadopiclenol dose (0.025, 0.05, 0.075, and 0.1 mmol Gd/kg) or gadoterate meglumine at 0.1 mmol Gd/kg (n = 5-6/group). The increase in signal-to-noise ratio (ΔSNR) in the aorta at the first pass was measured and compared. In a second, crossover study in 6 healthy pigs, abdominal CE-MRA sequences were acquired at 3 T with gadopiclenol at 0.05 mmol Gd/kg or gadoterate meglumine at 0.1 mmol Gd/kg at a 1-week interval. Quantitatively on the maximum intensity projection (MIP) images, the mean MIP SNR within the aorta of both groups was compared. Qualitatively, a blinded comparison of the angiograms was performed by an experienced radiologist to determine the preferred contrast agent.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the rabbit, ∆SNR is linearly correlated with the gadopiclenol dose ( P = 0.0010). Compared with gadoterate meglumine 0.1 mmol Gd/kg, an increase in the ∆SNR is observed after 0.05, 0.075, and 0.1 mmol Gd/kg of gadopiclenol (+63% P = 0.0731, +78% P = 0.0081, and +72% P = 0.0773, respectively), whereas at 0.025 mmol Gd/kg, ∆SNR is in the same range as with gadoterate meglumine 0.1 mmol Gd/kg (+15% P > 0.9999). In pigs, contrast enhancement after gadopiclenol at 0.05 mmol/kg is +22% superior to MIP SNR after gadoterate meglumine at 0.1 mmol Gd/kg ( P = 0.3095). Qualitatively, a preference was shown for gadopiclenol images (3/6) over the gadoterate meglumine examinations (1/6), with no preference being shown for the remainder (2/6).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>First-pass CE-MRA is feasible with gadopiclenol at 0.05 mmol Gd/kg with at least the same arterial signal enhancement and image quality as gadoterate meglumine at 0.1 mmol Gd/kg.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigative Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigative Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001083\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001083","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:据报道,使用钆基造影剂后,钆会在不同器官中意外蓄积,因此,在保持同等诊断性能的同时减少剂量是可取的。本研究旨在评估在腹部对比增强磁共振血管造影(CE-MRA)中,高弛豫度钆喷酸醇与钆喷酸葡胺的对比增强性能:在对健康兔子进行的首次研究中,在 4.7 T 下应用轴向三维梯度回波序列研究了钆喷酸诺剂量(0.025、0.05、0.075 和 0.1 mmol Gd/kg)或 0.1 mmol Gd/kg 的钆喷酸葡胺(n = 5-6/组)对动脉增强的影响。测量并比较了主动脉首次通过时信噪比(ΔSNR)的增加情况。在对 6 头健康猪进行的第二项交叉研究中,腹部 CE-MRA 序列是在 3 T 下用 0.05 mmol Gd/kg 的钆喷酸仑或 0.1 mmol Gd/kg 的钆喷酸葡胺采集的,间隔时间为 1 周。在最大强度投影(MIP)图像上,对两组主动脉内的平均 MIP SNR 进行定量比较。定性方面,由一名经验丰富的放射科医生对血管造影进行盲比对,以确定首选造影剂:在兔子身上,∆SNR 与钆喷酸酯剂量呈线性相关(P = 0.0010)。与钆特酸葡胺 0.1 毫摩尔 Gd/kg 相比,在使用 0.05、0.075 和 0.1 毫摩尔 Gd/kg 的钆吡特仑醇后,观察到 ∆SNR 增加(+63% P = 0.0731、+78% P = 0.0081 和 +72% P = 0.0773),而在 0.025 mmol Gd/kg 时,ΔSNR 与钆喷酸葡胺 0.1 mmol Gd/kg 时的范围相同(+15% P > 0.9999)。在猪身上,0.05 mmol/kg 的钆喷酸葡胺造影剂的对比增强效果比 0.1 mmol Gd/kg 的钆喷酸葡胺造影剂的 MIP SNR 高 22%(P = 0.3095)。定性分析显示,钆喷酸葡胺图像(3/6)优于钆喷酸葡胺检查(1/6),其余图像(2/6)无优劣之分:结论:使用 0.05 毫摩尔 Gd/kg 的钆喷酸葡胺进行第一道 CE-MRA 是可行的,其动脉信号增强和图像质量至少与 0.1 毫摩尔 Gd/kg 的钆喷酸葡胺相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the Contrast Enhancement Performance of Gadopiclenol for Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Healthy Rabbits and Pigs.

Objectives: Unexpected accumulations of gadolinium in various organs were reported after the administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents, making desirable to reduce the dose while maintaining equivalent diagnostic performance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the contrast enhancement performance of high relaxivity gadopiclenol compared with gadoterate meglumine in abdominal contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA).

Materials and methods: In a first study in healthy rabbits, axial 3D gradient echo sequences were applied at 4.7 T to study arterial enhancement as a function of gadopiclenol dose (0.025, 0.05, 0.075, and 0.1 mmol Gd/kg) or gadoterate meglumine at 0.1 mmol Gd/kg (n = 5-6/group). The increase in signal-to-noise ratio (ΔSNR) in the aorta at the first pass was measured and compared. In a second, crossover study in 6 healthy pigs, abdominal CE-MRA sequences were acquired at 3 T with gadopiclenol at 0.05 mmol Gd/kg or gadoterate meglumine at 0.1 mmol Gd/kg at a 1-week interval. Quantitatively on the maximum intensity projection (MIP) images, the mean MIP SNR within the aorta of both groups was compared. Qualitatively, a blinded comparison of the angiograms was performed by an experienced radiologist to determine the preferred contrast agent.

Results: In the rabbit, ∆SNR is linearly correlated with the gadopiclenol dose ( P = 0.0010). Compared with gadoterate meglumine 0.1 mmol Gd/kg, an increase in the ∆SNR is observed after 0.05, 0.075, and 0.1 mmol Gd/kg of gadopiclenol (+63% P = 0.0731, +78% P = 0.0081, and +72% P = 0.0773, respectively), whereas at 0.025 mmol Gd/kg, ∆SNR is in the same range as with gadoterate meglumine 0.1 mmol Gd/kg (+15% P > 0.9999). In pigs, contrast enhancement after gadopiclenol at 0.05 mmol/kg is +22% superior to MIP SNR after gadoterate meglumine at 0.1 mmol Gd/kg ( P = 0.3095). Qualitatively, a preference was shown for gadopiclenol images (3/6) over the gadoterate meglumine examinations (1/6), with no preference being shown for the remainder (2/6).

Conclusions: First-pass CE-MRA is feasible with gadopiclenol at 0.05 mmol Gd/kg with at least the same arterial signal enhancement and image quality as gadoterate meglumine at 0.1 mmol Gd/kg.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Investigative Radiology
Investigative Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
16.40%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信