{"title":"加强肺炎球菌菌血症诊断:对不依赖培养的检测方法(MALDI-TOF-MS Sepsityper® 模块和侧流免疫层析检测)进行比较评估。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.eimce.2024.02.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Pneumococcal bacteraemia is a major contributor to global morbidity and mortality. Traditional culture-based methods lack sensitivity and are time-consuming. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of two culture-independent assays, the MALDI–TOF–MS Sepsityper® module and the lateral flow inmunochromatography test (LFICT) with the Standard F® <em>Streptococcus pneumoniae</em>, directly from positive blood culture (BC) bottles.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective study was conducted from December 2021 to July 2022. For all BC positives for <span><span>S. pneumoniae</span></span> a double centrifugation protocol was implemented. The resulting pellet was subsequently processed using both techniques.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The LFICT showed exceptional performance with 100% sensitivity and specificity, outperforming the MALDI–TOF–MS Sepsityper® module, which achieved 85.2% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Nevertheless, the combination of these assays offers a robust and comprehensive approach to diagnosis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The simultaneous use of both techniques offers a promising alternative that can be integrated into routine practices directly from BC samples.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72916,"journal":{"name":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","volume":"42 7","pages":"Pages 377-379"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhancing pneumococcal bacteraemia diagnosis: A comparative assessment of culture-independent assays (MALDI–TOF–MS Sepsityper® module and a lateral flow inmunochromatography test)\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eimce.2024.02.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Pneumococcal bacteraemia is a major contributor to global morbidity and mortality. Traditional culture-based methods lack sensitivity and are time-consuming. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of two culture-independent assays, the MALDI–TOF–MS Sepsityper® module and the lateral flow inmunochromatography test (LFICT) with the Standard F® <em>Streptococcus pneumoniae</em>, directly from positive blood culture (BC) bottles.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A prospective study was conducted from December 2021 to July 2022. For all BC positives for <span><span>S. pneumoniae</span></span> a double centrifugation protocol was implemented. The resulting pellet was subsequently processed using both techniques.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The LFICT showed exceptional performance with 100% sensitivity and specificity, outperforming the MALDI–TOF–MS Sepsityper® module, which achieved 85.2% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Nevertheless, the combination of these assays offers a robust and comprehensive approach to diagnosis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The simultaneous use of both techniques offers a promising alternative that can be integrated into routine practices directly from BC samples.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)\",\"volume\":\"42 7\",\"pages\":\"Pages 377-379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529993X2400114X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Enfermedades infecciosas y microbiologia clinica (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2529993X2400114X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言:肺炎球菌菌血症是导致全球发病率和死亡率的一个主要因素。传统的基于培养的方法缺乏灵敏度且耗时。本研究旨在评估两种独立于培养的检测方法的有效性,即直接从血培养(BC)阳性瓶中检测标准 F 型肺炎链球菌的 MALDI-TOF-MS Sepsityper® 模块和侧流免疫层析检测(LFICT):2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 7 月期间进行了一项前瞻性研究。对所有血培养阳性的肺炎链球菌均采用双重离心方案。结果:LFICT 显示出卓越的性能:LFICT的灵敏度和特异性均为100%,表现优异,优于MALDI-TOF-MS Sepsityper®模块,后者的灵敏度为85.2%,特异性为100%。尽管如此,这两种检测方法的结合为诊断提供了一种稳健而全面的方法:结论:同时使用这两种技术提供了一种很有前景的替代方法,可以直接从 BC 样品中整合到常规实践中。
Enhancing pneumococcal bacteraemia diagnosis: A comparative assessment of culture-independent assays (MALDI–TOF–MS Sepsityper® module and a lateral flow inmunochromatography test)
Introduction
Pneumococcal bacteraemia is a major contributor to global morbidity and mortality. Traditional culture-based methods lack sensitivity and are time-consuming. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of two culture-independent assays, the MALDI–TOF–MS Sepsityper® module and the lateral flow inmunochromatography test (LFICT) with the Standard F® Streptococcus pneumoniae, directly from positive blood culture (BC) bottles.
Methods
A prospective study was conducted from December 2021 to July 2022. For all BC positives for S. pneumoniae a double centrifugation protocol was implemented. The resulting pellet was subsequently processed using both techniques.
Results
The LFICT showed exceptional performance with 100% sensitivity and specificity, outperforming the MALDI–TOF–MS Sepsityper® module, which achieved 85.2% sensitivity and 100% specificity. Nevertheless, the combination of these assays offers a robust and comprehensive approach to diagnosis.
Conclusions
The simultaneous use of both techniques offers a promising alternative that can be integrated into routine practices directly from BC samples.