在啮齿动物模型中进行单次脑震荡和反复亚脑震荡脑损伤后的短期行为和组织学研究结果。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Brain injury Pub Date : 2024-08-23 Epub Date: 2024-05-05 DOI:10.1080/02699052.2024.2349144
Anna Marie Clay, Russell L Carr, Janice L DuBien, Filip To
{"title":"在啮齿动物模型中进行单次脑震荡和反复亚脑震荡脑损伤后的短期行为和组织学研究结果。","authors":"Anna Marie Clay, Russell L Carr, Janice L DuBien, Filip To","doi":"10.1080/02699052.2024.2349144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Primary objective: </strong>It is unclear of the correlation between a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and repeated subconcussive (RSC) impacts with respect to injury biomechanics. Thus, the present study was designed to determine the behavioral and histological differences between a single mTBI impact and RSC impacts with subdivided cumulative kinetic energies of the single mTBI impact.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to a single mTBI impact, RSC impact, sham, or repeated sham groups.</p><p><strong>Methods and procedures: </strong>Following a weight drop injury, anxiety-like behavior and general locomotive activity and were assessed using the open field test, while motor coordination was evaluated using a rotarod unit. Neuronal loss, astrogliosis, and microgliosis were assessed using NeuN, GFAP and Iba-1 immunohistochemistry. All assessments were undertaken at 3- and 7-days post impact.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and results: </strong>No behavioral disturbances were observed in injury groups, however, both injury groups did lead to microgliosis following 3-days post-impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No pathophysiological differences were observed between a single mTBI impact and RSC impacts of the same energy input. Even though a cumulative injury threshold for RSC impacts was not determined, a threshold still may exist where no pathodynamic shift occurs.</p>","PeriodicalId":9082,"journal":{"name":"Brain injury","volume":" ","pages":"827-834"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short-term behavioral and histological findings following a single concussive and repeated subconcussive brain injury in a rodent model.\",\"authors\":\"Anna Marie Clay, Russell L Carr, Janice L DuBien, Filip To\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02699052.2024.2349144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Primary objective: </strong>It is unclear of the correlation between a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and repeated subconcussive (RSC) impacts with respect to injury biomechanics. Thus, the present study was designed to determine the behavioral and histological differences between a single mTBI impact and RSC impacts with subdivided cumulative kinetic energies of the single mTBI impact.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to a single mTBI impact, RSC impact, sham, or repeated sham groups.</p><p><strong>Methods and procedures: </strong>Following a weight drop injury, anxiety-like behavior and general locomotive activity and were assessed using the open field test, while motor coordination was evaluated using a rotarod unit. Neuronal loss, astrogliosis, and microgliosis were assessed using NeuN, GFAP and Iba-1 immunohistochemistry. All assessments were undertaken at 3- and 7-days post impact.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and results: </strong>No behavioral disturbances were observed in injury groups, however, both injury groups did lead to microgliosis following 3-days post-impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>No pathophysiological differences were observed between a single mTBI impact and RSC impacts of the same energy input. Even though a cumulative injury threshold for RSC impacts was not determined, a threshold still may exist where no pathodynamic shift occurs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain injury\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"827-834\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain injury\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2349144\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain injury","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02699052.2024.2349144","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

主要目的:轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)与重复次撞击(RSC)之间在损伤生物力学方面的相关性尚不清楚。因此,本研究旨在确定单次轻微脑损伤(mTBI)撞击和重复亚撞击(RSC)撞击在行为和组织学方面的差异,并对单次轻微脑损伤撞击的累积动能进行细分:研究设计:成年雄性 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠被随机分配到单次 mTBI 冲击、RSC 冲击、假组或重复假组:体重下降损伤后,焦虑样行为和一般运动活动通过开阔地测试进行评估,而运动协调性则通过转体装置进行评估。使用 NeuN、GFAP 和 Iba-1 免疫组化技术评估神经元丢失、星形胶质细胞增生和小胶质细胞增生情况。所有评估均在撞击后 3 天和 7 天进行:主要结果:受伤组没有观察到行为紊乱,但是,两组受伤者在撞击后 3 天后都出现了小胶质细胞增生:结论:单次 mTBI 碰撞与相同能量输入的 RSC 碰撞之间未观察到病理生理差异。尽管没有确定 RSC 撞击的累积损伤阈值,但仍可能存在一个阈值,在此阈值下不会发生病理动力学转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Short-term behavioral and histological findings following a single concussive and repeated subconcussive brain injury in a rodent model.

Primary objective: It is unclear of the correlation between a mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and repeated subconcussive (RSC) impacts with respect to injury biomechanics. Thus, the present study was designed to determine the behavioral and histological differences between a single mTBI impact and RSC impacts with subdivided cumulative kinetic energies of the single mTBI impact.

Research design: Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to a single mTBI impact, RSC impact, sham, or repeated sham groups.

Methods and procedures: Following a weight drop injury, anxiety-like behavior and general locomotive activity and were assessed using the open field test, while motor coordination was evaluated using a rotarod unit. Neuronal loss, astrogliosis, and microgliosis were assessed using NeuN, GFAP and Iba-1 immunohistochemistry. All assessments were undertaken at 3- and 7-days post impact.

Main outcomes and results: No behavioral disturbances were observed in injury groups, however, both injury groups did lead to microgliosis following 3-days post-impact.

Conclusions: No pathophysiological differences were observed between a single mTBI impact and RSC impacts of the same energy input. Even though a cumulative injury threshold for RSC impacts was not determined, a threshold still may exist where no pathodynamic shift occurs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain injury
Brain injury 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.30%
发文量
148
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Brain Injury publishes critical information relating to research and clinical practice, adult and pediatric populations. The journal covers a full range of relevant topics relating to clinical, translational, and basic science research. Manuscripts address emergency and acute medical care, acute and post-acute rehabilitation, family and vocational issues, and long-term supports. Coverage includes assessment and interventions for functional, communication, neurological and psychological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信