生活创伤史在当前心身表现中的作用。

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2024-04-25 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2023-0102
Melania Boni, Simone Violi, Antonella Ciaramella
{"title":"生活创伤史在当前心身表现中的作用。","authors":"Melania Boni, Simone Violi, Antonella Ciaramella","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2023-0102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although the relationship between traumatic experiences (TEs) and psychosomatic manifestations (pain, somatization, somatosensory amplification [SSA], and alexithymia) has been widely described, very few studies have investigated how these variables correlate with each other and with a history of TEs. The aim of this study was to investigate whether and how current psychosomatic manifestations are correlated with major and minor adult- and childhood TEs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and forty-six patients (91 with pain) from the Pisa Gift Institute for Integrative Medicine Psychosomatics Lab., Italy, were assessed for pain, history of TEs (divided into major and minor based on whether or not they meet the DSM-5 Criterion A for post-traumatic stress disorder), alexithymia, somatization, and SSA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TEs were positively correlated with age, the sensorial dimension and intensity of pain, somatization, psychopathology index, SSA, and alexithymia. Using the somatization score (controlled for age) as a covariate, the previous correlations between psychosomatic dimensions and TEs lost their statistical significance: SSA (total TEs: from <i>r</i> = 0.30, <i>p</i> = 0.000 to <i>r</i> = -0.04, <i>p</i> = 0.652); alexithymia (total TEs: from <i>r</i> = 0.28, <i>p</i> = 0.001 to <i>r</i> = 0.04, <i>p</i> = 0.663); sensorial dimension of pain (total TEs: from <i>r</i> = 0.30, <i>p</i> = 0.015 to <i>r</i> = 0.12, <i>p</i> = 0.373); and pain intensity (total TEs: from <i>r</i> = 0.38, <i>p</i> = 0.004 to <i>r</i> = -0.15, <i>p</i> = 0.317). Interestingly, the tendency to report more intense pain was mainly predicted by minor TEs in childhood (<i>β</i> = 0.28; <i>p</i> = 0.030).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The number of lifetime TEs is positively correlated with the sensorial dimension and intensity of pain but not its affective and cognitive dimensions. However, the former relationship depends on the presence of somatization. The intensity of pain is associated with minor rather than major TEs, especially when they occur in childhood.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of history of traumatic life experiences in current psychosomatic manifestations.\",\"authors\":\"Melania Boni, Simone Violi, Antonella Ciaramella\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/sjpain-2023-0102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Although the relationship between traumatic experiences (TEs) and psychosomatic manifestations (pain, somatization, somatosensory amplification [SSA], and alexithymia) has been widely described, very few studies have investigated how these variables correlate with each other and with a history of TEs. The aim of this study was to investigate whether and how current psychosomatic manifestations are correlated with major and minor adult- and childhood TEs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred and forty-six patients (91 with pain) from the Pisa Gift Institute for Integrative Medicine Psychosomatics Lab., Italy, were assessed for pain, history of TEs (divided into major and minor based on whether or not they meet the DSM-5 Criterion A for post-traumatic stress disorder), alexithymia, somatization, and SSA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>TEs were positively correlated with age, the sensorial dimension and intensity of pain, somatization, psychopathology index, SSA, and alexithymia. Using the somatization score (controlled for age) as a covariate, the previous correlations between psychosomatic dimensions and TEs lost their statistical significance: SSA (total TEs: from <i>r</i> = 0.30, <i>p</i> = 0.000 to <i>r</i> = -0.04, <i>p</i> = 0.652); alexithymia (total TEs: from <i>r</i> = 0.28, <i>p</i> = 0.001 to <i>r</i> = 0.04, <i>p</i> = 0.663); sensorial dimension of pain (total TEs: from <i>r</i> = 0.30, <i>p</i> = 0.015 to <i>r</i> = 0.12, <i>p</i> = 0.373); and pain intensity (total TEs: from <i>r</i> = 0.38, <i>p</i> = 0.004 to <i>r</i> = -0.15, <i>p</i> = 0.317). Interestingly, the tendency to report more intense pain was mainly predicted by minor TEs in childhood (<i>β</i> = 0.28; <i>p</i> = 0.030).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The number of lifetime TEs is positively correlated with the sensorial dimension and intensity of pain but not its affective and cognitive dimensions. However, the former relationship depends on the presence of somatization. The intensity of pain is associated with minor rather than major TEs, especially when they occur in childhood.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2023-0102\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2023-0102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:尽管创伤经历(TEs)与心身表现(疼痛、躯体化、躯体感觉放大[SSA]和lexithymia)之间的关系已被广泛描述,但很少有研究调查这些变量之间以及与创伤经历之间的相互关系。本研究的目的是调查目前的心身表现是否以及如何与成年和儿童时期的主要和次要 TEs 相关:对意大利比萨中西医结合研究所心身医学实验室的 146 名患者(91 名疼痛患者)进行了疼痛、创伤后应激障碍史(根据是否符合 DSM-5 创伤后应激障碍标准 A,分为主要和次要创伤后应激障碍)、情感障碍、躯体化和 SSA 的评估:创伤后应激障碍与年龄、疼痛的感觉维度和强度、躯体化、精神病理学指数、SSA 和情感障碍呈正相关。将躯体化评分(年龄控制)作为协变量后,以往心身维度与 TEs 之间的相关性失去了统计意义:SSA(总 TEs:从 r = 0.30,p = 0.000 到 r = -0.04,p = 0.652);lexithymia(总 TEs:从 r = 0.28,p = 0.001 到 r = 0.04,p = 0.663);疼痛的感觉维度(总 TEs:从 r = 0.30,p = 0.015 到 r = 0.12,p = 0.373);以及疼痛强度(总 TEs:从 r = 0.38,p = 0.004 到 r = -0.15,p = 0.317)。有趣的是,报告更剧烈疼痛的倾向主要由童年时期的轻微 TEs 预测(β = 0.28; p = 0.030):结论:终生 TEs 的数量与疼痛的感觉维度和强度呈正相关,但与其情感和认知维度无关。然而,前者的关系取决于是否存在躯体化。疼痛强度与轻微而非严重的TEs相关,尤其是当TEs发生在童年时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of history of traumatic life experiences in current psychosomatic manifestations.

Objectives: Although the relationship between traumatic experiences (TEs) and psychosomatic manifestations (pain, somatization, somatosensory amplification [SSA], and alexithymia) has been widely described, very few studies have investigated how these variables correlate with each other and with a history of TEs. The aim of this study was to investigate whether and how current psychosomatic manifestations are correlated with major and minor adult- and childhood TEs.

Methods: One hundred and forty-six patients (91 with pain) from the Pisa Gift Institute for Integrative Medicine Psychosomatics Lab., Italy, were assessed for pain, history of TEs (divided into major and minor based on whether or not they meet the DSM-5 Criterion A for post-traumatic stress disorder), alexithymia, somatization, and SSA.

Results: TEs were positively correlated with age, the sensorial dimension and intensity of pain, somatization, psychopathology index, SSA, and alexithymia. Using the somatization score (controlled for age) as a covariate, the previous correlations between psychosomatic dimensions and TEs lost their statistical significance: SSA (total TEs: from r = 0.30, p = 0.000 to r = -0.04, p = 0.652); alexithymia (total TEs: from r = 0.28, p = 0.001 to r = 0.04, p = 0.663); sensorial dimension of pain (total TEs: from r = 0.30, p = 0.015 to r = 0.12, p = 0.373); and pain intensity (total TEs: from r = 0.38, p = 0.004 to r = -0.15, p = 0.317). Interestingly, the tendency to report more intense pain was mainly predicted by minor TEs in childhood (β = 0.28; p = 0.030).

Conclusions: The number of lifetime TEs is positively correlated with the sensorial dimension and intensity of pain but not its affective and cognitive dimensions. However, the former relationship depends on the presence of somatization. The intensity of pain is associated with minor rather than major TEs, especially when they occur in childhood.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信