Linnea Arvidsson, Marcus Landgren, Anna Kajsa Harding, Antonio Abramo, Magnus Tägil
{"title":"80 岁或以上桡骨远端骨折患者的一年死亡率低于年龄和性别匹配的对照组：一项基于登记的研究。","authors":"Linnea Arvidsson, Marcus Landgren, Anna Kajsa Harding, Antonio Abramo, Magnus Tägil","doi":"10.1177/21514593241252583","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With a rapidly ageing population, the number of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in the elderly will increase dramatically. The aim of this retrospective register study was to examine the 1- and 5-year mortality in DRF patients aged 80 years or more and correlate the overall survival to factors not related to the fracture itself.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients aged ≥80 diagnosed with DRFs in Lund University Hospital in Sweden in the period 2010-2012 were extracted from the prospective Lund Distal Radius Fracture register. One- and 5-year standardised mortality rates (SMRs) were calculated using the Swedish standard population as a reference. Medical records were searched for non-fracture-related factors including comorbidity, medications, cognitive impairment and type of living. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to identify prognostic factors for all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort included 240 patients, with a mean age of 86. The overall 1-year mortality was 5% (n = 11/240) and the 5-year mortality was 44% (n = 105/240). The 1-year SMR was .44 (CI .18-.69, <i>P</i> < .01) when indirectly adjusted for age and gender and compared to the Swedish standard population. The 5-year SMR was .96 (CI .78-1.14). The patients' ability to live independently in their own home had the highest impact on survival.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The 1-year mortality rate among the super-elderly DRF patients was only 44% of that expected. Possibly, a DRF at this age could be a sign of a healthier and more active patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DRF patients aged 80 or more had a substantially lower mortality rate 1 year after fracture compared to the age- and gender-matched standard population. Patients living independently in their own homes had the longest life expectancy. Treatment should not be limited solely because of old age, but individualised according to the patient's ability and activity level.</p>","PeriodicalId":48568,"journal":{"name":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11072058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patients Aged 80 or More With Distal Radius Fractures Have a Lower One-Year Mortality Rate Than Age- and Gender-Matched Controls: A Register-Based Study.\",\"authors\":\"Linnea Arvidsson, Marcus Landgren, Anna Kajsa Harding, Antonio Abramo, Magnus Tägil\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/21514593241252583\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>With a rapidly ageing population, the number of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in the elderly will increase dramatically. The aim of this retrospective register study was to examine the 1- and 5-year mortality in DRF patients aged 80 years or more and correlate the overall survival to factors not related to the fracture itself.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Patients aged ≥80 diagnosed with DRFs in Lund University Hospital in Sweden in the period 2010-2012 were extracted from the prospective Lund Distal Radius Fracture register. One- and 5-year standardised mortality rates (SMRs) were calculated using the Swedish standard population as a reference. Medical records were searched for non-fracture-related factors including comorbidity, medications, cognitive impairment and type of living. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to identify prognostic factors for all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study cohort included 240 patients, with a mean age of 86. The overall 1-year mortality was 5% (n = 11/240) and the 5-year mortality was 44% (n = 105/240). The 1-year SMR was .44 (CI .18-.69, <i>P</i> < .01) when indirectly adjusted for age and gender and compared to the Swedish standard population. The 5-year SMR was .96 (CI .78-1.14). The patients' ability to live independently in their own home had the highest impact on survival.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The 1-year mortality rate among the super-elderly DRF patients was only 44% of that expected. Possibly, a DRF at this age could be a sign of a healthier and more active patient.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DRF patients aged 80 or more had a substantially lower mortality rate 1 year after fracture compared to the age- and gender-matched standard population. Patients living independently in their own homes had the longest life expectancy. Treatment should not be limited solely because of old age, but individualised according to the patient's ability and activity level.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11072058/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593241252583\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21514593241252583","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Patients Aged 80 or More With Distal Radius Fractures Have a Lower One-Year Mortality Rate Than Age- and Gender-Matched Controls: A Register-Based Study.
Introduction: With a rapidly ageing population, the number of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in the elderly will increase dramatically. The aim of this retrospective register study was to examine the 1- and 5-year mortality in DRF patients aged 80 years or more and correlate the overall survival to factors not related to the fracture itself.
Material and methods: Patients aged ≥80 diagnosed with DRFs in Lund University Hospital in Sweden in the period 2010-2012 were extracted from the prospective Lund Distal Radius Fracture register. One- and 5-year standardised mortality rates (SMRs) were calculated using the Swedish standard population as a reference. Medical records were searched for non-fracture-related factors including comorbidity, medications, cognitive impairment and type of living. Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to identify prognostic factors for all-cause mortality.
Results: The study cohort included 240 patients, with a mean age of 86. The overall 1-year mortality was 5% (n = 11/240) and the 5-year mortality was 44% (n = 105/240). The 1-year SMR was .44 (CI .18-.69, P < .01) when indirectly adjusted for age and gender and compared to the Swedish standard population. The 5-year SMR was .96 (CI .78-1.14). The patients' ability to live independently in their own home had the highest impact on survival.
Discussion: The 1-year mortality rate among the super-elderly DRF patients was only 44% of that expected. Possibly, a DRF at this age could be a sign of a healthier and more active patient.
Conclusions: The DRF patients aged 80 or more had a substantially lower mortality rate 1 year after fracture compared to the age- and gender-matched standard population. Patients living independently in their own homes had the longest life expectancy. Treatment should not be limited solely because of old age, but individualised according to the patient's ability and activity level.
期刊介绍：
Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation (GOS) is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that provides clinical information concerning musculoskeletal conditions affecting the aging population. GOS focuses on care of geriatric orthopaedic patients and their subsequent rehabilitation. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
