利用酶清创和自体皮肤细胞喷雾进行 "微创 "植皮:回顾性病例系列。

Annals of burns and fire disasters Pub Date : 2023-12-31 eCollection Date: 2023-12-01
S A Kahn, N Raghava, G Gaweda, A Hink, J Holmes Iv, W Hickerson, J E Carter
{"title":"利用酶清创和自体皮肤细胞喷雾进行 \"微创 \"植皮:回顾性病例系列。","authors":"S A Kahn, N Raghava, G Gaweda, A Hink, J Holmes Iv, W Hickerson, J E Carter","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Minimally invasive surgery is becoming the standard of care across surgical subspecialties. Several new \"minimally invasive\" options for burn debridement and autografting exist. Enzymatic bromelain-based debridement (BBD) and autologous skin cell spray (ASCS) have independently proven to reduce the rate of split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) and decrease donor site size when grafting is performed. There is a paucity in the literature regarding the combination of these two therapies. The purpose of this study is to characterize a cohort of patients treated with both BBD and ASCS and qualitatively compare data to expected outcomes without these therapies. This retrospective study of a single academic burn center's experience using BBD and ASCS together included 13 patients with a total burn surface area (TBSA) from 1-30% and all had >50% deep partial thickness. All patients received BBD and ASCS. Deeper burns additionally received STSG with ASCS overspray. Median burn size was 14% TBSA (IQR:5.45,20), donor site size was 225 sq cm (IQR:28.5,556.5), and ratio of donor site area to total treatment area of 0.082 (IQR: 0.039, 0.241) was observed. Median observed length of stay (LOS) was 19 days (IQR:10,27), expected LOS was 15.4 days, and O/E ratio 1.06. Donor sites in both groups of patients were much smaller than expected versus treatment with conventional meshed STSG alone and length of stay is lower than expected based on burn size. An emphasis on expenses and scar development will guide future studies into the patient subset and wound features that are best for this combination treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":93873,"journal":{"name":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","volume":"36 4","pages":"355-360"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042072/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Minimally Invasive\\\" Skin Grafting With Enzymatic Debridement and Autologous Skin Cell Spray: A Retrospective Case Series.\",\"authors\":\"S A Kahn, N Raghava, G Gaweda, A Hink, J Holmes Iv, W Hickerson, J E Carter\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Minimally invasive surgery is becoming the standard of care across surgical subspecialties. Several new \\\"minimally invasive\\\" options for burn debridement and autografting exist. Enzymatic bromelain-based debridement (BBD) and autologous skin cell spray (ASCS) have independently proven to reduce the rate of split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) and decrease donor site size when grafting is performed. There is a paucity in the literature regarding the combination of these two therapies. The purpose of this study is to characterize a cohort of patients treated with both BBD and ASCS and qualitatively compare data to expected outcomes without these therapies. This retrospective study of a single academic burn center's experience using BBD and ASCS together included 13 patients with a total burn surface area (TBSA) from 1-30% and all had >50% deep partial thickness. All patients received BBD and ASCS. Deeper burns additionally received STSG with ASCS overspray. Median burn size was 14% TBSA (IQR:5.45,20), donor site size was 225 sq cm (IQR:28.5,556.5), and ratio of donor site area to total treatment area of 0.082 (IQR: 0.039, 0.241) was observed. Median observed length of stay (LOS) was 19 days (IQR:10,27), expected LOS was 15.4 days, and O/E ratio 1.06. Donor sites in both groups of patients were much smaller than expected versus treatment with conventional meshed STSG alone and length of stay is lower than expected based on burn size. An emphasis on expenses and scar development will guide future studies into the patient subset and wound features that are best for this combination treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93873,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of burns and fire disasters\",\"volume\":\"36 4\",\"pages\":\"355-360\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042072/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of burns and fire disasters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2023/12/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of burns and fire disasters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

微创手术正在成为各外科亚专科的护理标准。目前有几种新的 "微创 "烧伤清创和自体移植方案。酵素菠萝蛋白酶清创术(BBD)和自体皮肤细胞喷涂术(ASCS)已被证实可降低劈裂厚皮移植术(STSG)的发生率,并在进行移植时缩小供皮部位的面积。有关这两种疗法结合使用的文献很少。本研究的目的是分析同时接受 BBD 和 ASCS 治疗的患者群体的特征,并将数据与未接受这两种疗法的预期结果进行定性比较。本研究是对一家学术烧伤中心同时使用 BBD 和 ASCS 的经验进行的回顾性研究,研究对象包括 13 名烧伤总面积 (TBSA) 在 1-30% 之间的患者,所有患者的深部部分厚度均大于 50%。所有患者都接受了 BBD 和 ASCS 治疗。烧伤较深的患者还接受了ASCS过喷的STSG治疗。烧伤面积中位数为 14% TBSA(IQR:5.45,20),供体部位面积为 225 平方厘米(IQR:28.5,556.5),供体部位面积与总治疗面积之比为 0.082(IQR:0.039,0.241)。观察到的中位住院时间(LOS)为 19 天(IQR:10,27),预期住院时间为 15.4 天,O/E 比为 1.06。与单独使用传统网状 STSG 治疗相比,两组患者的捐献部位都比预期的要小得多,而且根据烧伤面积计算,住院时间也比预期的要短。对费用和疤痕发展的重视将指导今后对最适合这种联合疗法的患者群体和伤口特征进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Minimally Invasive" Skin Grafting With Enzymatic Debridement and Autologous Skin Cell Spray: A Retrospective Case Series.

Minimally invasive surgery is becoming the standard of care across surgical subspecialties. Several new "minimally invasive" options for burn debridement and autografting exist. Enzymatic bromelain-based debridement (BBD) and autologous skin cell spray (ASCS) have independently proven to reduce the rate of split-thickness skin grafting (STSG) and decrease donor site size when grafting is performed. There is a paucity in the literature regarding the combination of these two therapies. The purpose of this study is to characterize a cohort of patients treated with both BBD and ASCS and qualitatively compare data to expected outcomes without these therapies. This retrospective study of a single academic burn center's experience using BBD and ASCS together included 13 patients with a total burn surface area (TBSA) from 1-30% and all had >50% deep partial thickness. All patients received BBD and ASCS. Deeper burns additionally received STSG with ASCS overspray. Median burn size was 14% TBSA (IQR:5.45,20), donor site size was 225 sq cm (IQR:28.5,556.5), and ratio of donor site area to total treatment area of 0.082 (IQR: 0.039, 0.241) was observed. Median observed length of stay (LOS) was 19 days (IQR:10,27), expected LOS was 15.4 days, and O/E ratio 1.06. Donor sites in both groups of patients were much smaller than expected versus treatment with conventional meshed STSG alone and length of stay is lower than expected based on burn size. An emphasis on expenses and scar development will guide future studies into the patient subset and wound features that are best for this combination treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信