英国生物库中根据不同诊断标准得出的脂蛋白异常血症患病率。

IF 5 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Martine Paquette, Mark Trinder, Simon-Pierre Guay, Liam R Brunham, Alexis Baass
{"title":"英国生物库中根据不同诊断标准得出的脂蛋白异常血症患病率。","authors":"Martine Paquette, Mark Trinder, Simon-Pierre Guay, Liam R Brunham, Alexis Baass","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgae259","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Dysbetalipoproteinemia (DBL) is a multifactorial disorder that disrupts the normal metabolism of remnant lipoproteins, causing increased risk of cardiovascular disease. However, establishing a proper diagnosis is difficult, and the true prevalence of the disease in the general population remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives were to study the prevalence of the disease and to validate the performance of different clinical diagnostic criteria in a large population-based cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 453 437 participants from the UK Biobank. DBL was established in participants having an ε2ε2 genotype with mixed dyslipidemia or lipid-lowering therapy use (n = 964). The different diagnostic criteria for DBL were applied in individuals without lipid-lowering medication (n = 370 039, n = 534 DBL), to compare their performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 0.6% of participants had an ε2ε2 genotype, of which 36% were classified as DBL, for a disease prevalence of 0.2% (1:469). The prevalence of DBL was similar between the different genetic ancestries (≤0.2%). Several diagnostic criteria showed good sensitivity for the diagnosis of DBL (>90%), but they suffered from a very low positive predictive value (0.6-15.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reported for the first time the prevalence of DBL in the UK Biobank according to genetic ancestry. Furthermore, we provided the first external validation of different diagnostic criteria for DBL in a large population-based cohort and highlighted the fact that these criteria should not be used to diagnose DBL alone but should rather be used as a first screening step to determine which individuals may benefit from genetic testing to confirm the diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":50238,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":"e703-e709"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prevalence of Dysbetalipoproteinemia in the UK Biobank According to Different Diagnostic Criteria.\",\"authors\":\"Martine Paquette, Mark Trinder, Simon-Pierre Guay, Liam R Brunham, Alexis Baass\",\"doi\":\"10.1210/clinem/dgae259\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Dysbetalipoproteinemia (DBL) is a multifactorial disorder that disrupts the normal metabolism of remnant lipoproteins, causing increased risk of cardiovascular disease. However, establishing a proper diagnosis is difficult, and the true prevalence of the disease in the general population remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objectives were to study the prevalence of the disease and to validate the performance of different clinical diagnostic criteria in a large population-based cohort.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 453 437 participants from the UK Biobank. DBL was established in participants having an ε2ε2 genotype with mixed dyslipidemia or lipid-lowering therapy use (n = 964). The different diagnostic criteria for DBL were applied in individuals without lipid-lowering medication (n = 370 039, n = 534 DBL), to compare their performance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 0.6% of participants had an ε2ε2 genotype, of which 36% were classified as DBL, for a disease prevalence of 0.2% (1:469). The prevalence of DBL was similar between the different genetic ancestries (≤0.2%). Several diagnostic criteria showed good sensitivity for the diagnosis of DBL (>90%), but they suffered from a very low positive predictive value (0.6-15.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study reported for the first time the prevalence of DBL in the UK Biobank according to genetic ancestry. Furthermore, we provided the first external validation of different diagnostic criteria for DBL in a large population-based cohort and highlighted the fact that these criteria should not be used to diagnose DBL alone but should rather be used as a first screening step to determine which individuals may benefit from genetic testing to confirm the diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e703-e709\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae259\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgae259","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不良脂蛋白血症(DBL)是一种多因素疾病,会破坏残余脂蛋白的正常代谢,从而增加罹患心血管疾病的风险。然而,确定正确的诊断并不容易,而且该病在普通人群中的真实发病率仍然未知:目的:研究该疾病的患病率,并在一个基于人群的大型队列中验证不同临床诊断标准的性能:这项研究包括英国生物库中的 453 437 名参与者。DBL在具有ε2ε2基因型、混合型血脂异常或使用降脂治疗的参与者(964人)中被确定。对未服用降脂药的个体(n=370 039,n=534 DBL)采用了不同的DBL诊断标准,以比较它们的表现:总体而言,0.6%的参与者具有ε2ε2基因型,其中36%被归类为DBL,患病率为0.2%(1:469)。不同基因血统的 DBL 患病率相似(≤0.2%)。几项诊断标准显示了诊断 DBL 的良好灵敏度(>90%),但它们的阳性预测值很低(0.6%-15.4%):本研究首次报告了英国生物库中根据遗传血统划分的 DBL 患病率。此外,我们还首次在大型人群队列中对不同的 DBL 诊断标准进行了外部验证,并强调这些标准不应单独用于诊断 DBL,而应作为第一步筛查,以确定哪些人可能受益于基因检测来确诊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prevalence of Dysbetalipoproteinemia in the UK Biobank According to Different Diagnostic Criteria.

Context: Dysbetalipoproteinemia (DBL) is a multifactorial disorder that disrupts the normal metabolism of remnant lipoproteins, causing increased risk of cardiovascular disease. However, establishing a proper diagnosis is difficult, and the true prevalence of the disease in the general population remains unknown.

Objective: The objectives were to study the prevalence of the disease and to validate the performance of different clinical diagnostic criteria in a large population-based cohort.

Methods: This study included 453 437 participants from the UK Biobank. DBL was established in participants having an ε2ε2 genotype with mixed dyslipidemia or lipid-lowering therapy use (n = 964). The different diagnostic criteria for DBL were applied in individuals without lipid-lowering medication (n = 370 039, n = 534 DBL), to compare their performance.

Results: Overall, 0.6% of participants had an ε2ε2 genotype, of which 36% were classified as DBL, for a disease prevalence of 0.2% (1:469). The prevalence of DBL was similar between the different genetic ancestries (≤0.2%). Several diagnostic criteria showed good sensitivity for the diagnosis of DBL (>90%), but they suffered from a very low positive predictive value (0.6-15.4%).

Conclusion: This study reported for the first time the prevalence of DBL in the UK Biobank according to genetic ancestry. Furthermore, we provided the first external validation of different diagnostic criteria for DBL in a large population-based cohort and highlighted the fact that these criteria should not be used to diagnose DBL alone but should rather be used as a first screening step to determine which individuals may benefit from genetic testing to confirm the diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.20%
发文量
673
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism is the world"s leading peer-reviewed journal for endocrine clinical research and cutting edge clinical practice reviews. Each issue provides the latest in-depth coverage of new developments enhancing our understanding, diagnosis and treatment of endocrine and metabolic disorders. Regular features of special interest to endocrine consultants include clinical trials, clinical reviews, clinical practice guidelines, case seminars, and controversies in clinical endocrinology, as well as original reports of the most important advances in patient-oriented endocrine and metabolic research. According to the latest Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Report, JCE&M articles were cited 64,185 times in 2008.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信