丹麦药房员工的局部皮质类固醇恐惧症。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Dermatology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-26 DOI:10.1159/000534766
Jakob Maarbjerg Toft-Hansen, Line Brok Nørreslet, Ida Vittrup, Jacob Pontoppidan Thyssen, Tove Agner, Yasemin Topal Yüksel
{"title":"丹麦药房员工的局部皮质类固醇恐惧症。","authors":"Jakob Maarbjerg Toft-Hansen, Line Brok Nørreslet, Ida Vittrup, Jacob Pontoppidan Thyssen, Tove Agner, Yasemin Topal Yüksel","doi":"10.1159/000534766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Topical corticosteroid (TCS) phobia may negatively impact treatment adherence. Currently, there are few studies exploring trust and knowledge of TCS use among pharmacy staff. The objective of this work was to examine TCS knowledge and possible phobia among Danish pharmacy staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire, based on Topical Corticosteroid Phobia (TOPICOP©) questionnaire, was developed and rephrased to fit pharmacy staff. The questions were Likert scales and numerical rating scales (NRS) (0-10). In October/November 2021, 64 pharmacies were invited. If the pharmacies agreed to participate, a researcher visited the pharmacies and distributed the questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 244 pharmacy workers from 59 pharmacies participated. The majority (95.4%) responded that they were aware of side effects of TCS; however, misconceptions regarding side effects were found in up to 34% of participants. Regarding TCS use, 40% sometimes advised the patients to wait as long as possible before initiating treatment with TCS. Confidence in dispensing TCS to patients was high, with a mean of 8.45 (NRS).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Danish pharmacy staff generally reported high confidence in TCS use. Misconceptions regarding side effects were common, and there was a tendency to giving advices on TCS treatment that may indicate low confidence in TCS. Thorough education of pharmacy staff is needed to improve the knowledge of TCS.</p>","PeriodicalId":11185,"journal":{"name":"Dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"581-588"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Topical Corticosteroid Phobia among Danish Pharmacy Staff.\",\"authors\":\"Jakob Maarbjerg Toft-Hansen, Line Brok Nørreslet, Ida Vittrup, Jacob Pontoppidan Thyssen, Tove Agner, Yasemin Topal Yüksel\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000534766\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Topical corticosteroid (TCS) phobia may negatively impact treatment adherence. Currently, there are few studies exploring trust and knowledge of TCS use among pharmacy staff. The objective of this work was to examine TCS knowledge and possible phobia among Danish pharmacy staff.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire, based on Topical Corticosteroid Phobia (TOPICOP©) questionnaire, was developed and rephrased to fit pharmacy staff. The questions were Likert scales and numerical rating scales (NRS) (0-10). In October/November 2021, 64 pharmacies were invited. If the pharmacies agreed to participate, a researcher visited the pharmacies and distributed the questionnaires.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 244 pharmacy workers from 59 pharmacies participated. The majority (95.4%) responded that they were aware of side effects of TCS; however, misconceptions regarding side effects were found in up to 34% of participants. Regarding TCS use, 40% sometimes advised the patients to wait as long as possible before initiating treatment with TCS. Confidence in dispensing TCS to patients was high, with a mean of 8.45 (NRS).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Danish pharmacy staff generally reported high confidence in TCS use. Misconceptions regarding side effects were common, and there was a tendency to giving advices on TCS treatment that may indicate low confidence in TCS. Thorough education of pharmacy staff is needed to improve the knowledge of TCS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dermatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"581-588\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dermatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534766\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534766","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:局部皮质类固醇(TCS)恐惧症可能会对坚持治疗产生负面影响。目前,很少有研究探讨药房员工对使用外用皮质类固醇的信任和知识:研究丹麦药房员工对 TCS 的了解程度以及可能存在的恐惧症:方法:根据局部皮质类固醇恐惧症(TOPICOP©)问卷编制了一份问卷,并根据药房员工的情况进行了改写。问题采用李克特量表和数字评定量表(NRS)(0-10)。2021 年 10 月/11 月,64 家药房收到了邀请。如果药店同意参与,研究人员将走访药店并分发问卷:共有来自 59 家药店的 244 名药剂师参与了调查。大多数人(95.4%)回答说他们知道三氯杀螨醇的副作用,但也有高达 34% 的参与者对副作用存在误解。关于 TCS 的使用,40% 的药剂师有时会建议患者在开始使用 TCS 治疗前尽可能等待更长的时间。向患者配发 TCS 的信心很高,平均值为 8.45(NRS):结论:丹麦药剂师普遍对使用 TCS 有很高的信心。结论:丹麦药剂师普遍表示对使用 TCS 有较高的信心,但对副作用的误解很常见,而且倾向于就 TCS 治疗提供建议,这可能表明他们对 TCS 的信心不足。需要对药房工作人员进行全面教育,以提高他们对 TCS 的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Topical Corticosteroid Phobia among Danish Pharmacy Staff.

Introduction: Topical corticosteroid (TCS) phobia may negatively impact treatment adherence. Currently, there are few studies exploring trust and knowledge of TCS use among pharmacy staff. The objective of this work was to examine TCS knowledge and possible phobia among Danish pharmacy staff.

Methods: A questionnaire, based on Topical Corticosteroid Phobia (TOPICOP©) questionnaire, was developed and rephrased to fit pharmacy staff. The questions were Likert scales and numerical rating scales (NRS) (0-10). In October/November 2021, 64 pharmacies were invited. If the pharmacies agreed to participate, a researcher visited the pharmacies and distributed the questionnaires.

Results: A total of 244 pharmacy workers from 59 pharmacies participated. The majority (95.4%) responded that they were aware of side effects of TCS; however, misconceptions regarding side effects were found in up to 34% of participants. Regarding TCS use, 40% sometimes advised the patients to wait as long as possible before initiating treatment with TCS. Confidence in dispensing TCS to patients was high, with a mean of 8.45 (NRS).

Conclusion: Danish pharmacy staff generally reported high confidence in TCS use. Misconceptions regarding side effects were common, and there was a tendency to giving advices on TCS treatment that may indicate low confidence in TCS. Thorough education of pharmacy staff is needed to improve the knowledge of TCS.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Dermatology
Dermatology 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
71
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published since 1893, ''Dermatology'' provides a worldwide survey of clinical and investigative dermatology. Original papers report clinical and laboratory findings. In order to inform readers of the implications of recent research, editorials and reviews prepared by invited, internationally recognized scientists are regularly featured. In addition to original papers, the journal publishes rapid communications, short communications, and letters to ''Dermatology''. ''Dermatology'' answers the complete information needs of practitioners concerned with progress in research related to skin, clinical dermatology and therapy. The journal enjoys a high scientific reputation with a continually increasing impact factor and an equally high circulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信