应用 TENS 时步幅运动学的时间变异性:机器学习分析。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Sajjad Daneshgar, Fabian Hoitz, Roger M Enoka
{"title":"应用 TENS 时步幅运动学的时间变异性:机器学习分析。","authors":"Sajjad Daneshgar, Fabian Hoitz, Roger M Enoka","doi":"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003469","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of our report was to use a Random Forest classification approach to predict the association between transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and walking kinematics at the stride level when middle-aged and older adults performed the 6-min test of walking endurance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 41 participants (aged 64.6 ± 9.7 yr) acquired in two previously published studies were analyzed with a Random Forest algorithm that focused on upper and lower limb, lumbar, and trunk kinematics. The four most predictive kinematic features were identified and utilized in separate models to distinguish between three walking conditions: burst TENS, continuous TENS, and control. SHAP analysis and linear mixed models were used to characterize the differences among these conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Modulation of four key kinematic features-toe-out angle, toe-off angle, and lumbar range of motion (ROM) in coronal and sagittal planes-accurately predicted walking conditions for the burst (82% accuracy) and continuous (77% accuracy) TENS conditions compared with control. Linear mixed models detected a significant difference in lumbar sagittal ROM between the TENS conditions. SHAP analysis revealed that burst TENS was positively associated with greater lumbar coronal ROM, smaller toe-off angle, and less lumbar sagittal ROM. Conversely, continuous TENS was associated with less lumbar coronal ROM and greater lumbar sagittal ROM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our approach identified four kinematic features at the stride level that could distinguish between the three walking conditions. These distinctions were not evident in average values across strides.</p>","PeriodicalId":18426,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","volume":" ","pages":"1701-1708"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Temporal Variability in Stride Kinematics during the Application of TENS: A Machine Learning Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Sajjad Daneshgar, Fabian Hoitz, Roger M Enoka\",\"doi\":\"10.1249/MSS.0000000000003469\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of our report was to use a Random Forest classification approach to predict the association between transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and walking kinematics at the stride level when middle-aged and older adults performed the 6-min test of walking endurance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 41 participants (aged 64.6 ± 9.7 yr) acquired in two previously published studies were analyzed with a Random Forest algorithm that focused on upper and lower limb, lumbar, and trunk kinematics. The four most predictive kinematic features were identified and utilized in separate models to distinguish between three walking conditions: burst TENS, continuous TENS, and control. SHAP analysis and linear mixed models were used to characterize the differences among these conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Modulation of four key kinematic features-toe-out angle, toe-off angle, and lumbar range of motion (ROM) in coronal and sagittal planes-accurately predicted walking conditions for the burst (82% accuracy) and continuous (77% accuracy) TENS conditions compared with control. Linear mixed models detected a significant difference in lumbar sagittal ROM between the TENS conditions. SHAP analysis revealed that burst TENS was positively associated with greater lumbar coronal ROM, smaller toe-off angle, and less lumbar sagittal ROM. Conversely, continuous TENS was associated with less lumbar coronal ROM and greater lumbar sagittal ROM.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our approach identified four kinematic features at the stride level that could distinguish between the three walking conditions. These distinctions were not evident in average values across strides.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1701-1708\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003469\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/30 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1249/MSS.0000000000003469","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介我们报告的目的是使用随机森林分类法来预测中老年人在进行 6 分钟步行耐力测试时,经皮神经电刺激(TENS)与步行步幅运动学之间的关联:采用随机森林算法对之前发表的两项研究中获得的 41 名参与者(年龄为 64.6 ± 9.7 岁)的数据进行了分析,该算法主要关注上下肢、腰部和躯干的运动学特征。确定了四个最具预测性的运动学特征,并将其用于不同的模型中,以区分三种行走条件:突发 TENS、连续 TENS 和对照。SHAP 分析和线性混合模型用于描述这些条件之间的差异:结果:与对照组相比,对四个关键运动学特征--趾外角、趾离角和腰部在冠状面和矢状面上的运动范围(ROM)--的调节能准确预测爆发式 TENS(准确率为 82%)和持续式 TENS(准确率为 77%)条件下的行走状况。线性混合模型检测出不同 TENS 条件下的腰椎矢状面 ROM 存在显著差异。SHAP分析显示,爆发式TENS与更大的腰椎冠状位活动度、更小的脚趾离开角度和更小的腰椎矢状位活动度呈正相关。相反,连续 TENS 与较小的腰椎冠状位 ROM 和较大的腰椎矢状位 ROM 相关:我们的方法确定了步幅水平上的四个运动学特征,它们可以区分三种行走状态。这些区别在跨步的平均值中并不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Temporal Variability in Stride Kinematics during the Application of TENS: A Machine Learning Analysis.

Introduction: The purpose of our report was to use a Random Forest classification approach to predict the association between transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and walking kinematics at the stride level when middle-aged and older adults performed the 6-min test of walking endurance.

Methods: Data from 41 participants (aged 64.6 ± 9.7 yr) acquired in two previously published studies were analyzed with a Random Forest algorithm that focused on upper and lower limb, lumbar, and trunk kinematics. The four most predictive kinematic features were identified and utilized in separate models to distinguish between three walking conditions: burst TENS, continuous TENS, and control. SHAP analysis and linear mixed models were used to characterize the differences among these conditions.

Results: Modulation of four key kinematic features-toe-out angle, toe-off angle, and lumbar range of motion (ROM) in coronal and sagittal planes-accurately predicted walking conditions for the burst (82% accuracy) and continuous (77% accuracy) TENS conditions compared with control. Linear mixed models detected a significant difference in lumbar sagittal ROM between the TENS conditions. SHAP analysis revealed that burst TENS was positively associated with greater lumbar coronal ROM, smaller toe-off angle, and less lumbar sagittal ROM. Conversely, continuous TENS was associated with less lumbar coronal ROM and greater lumbar sagittal ROM.

Conclusions: Our approach identified four kinematic features at the stride level that could distinguish between the three walking conditions. These distinctions were not evident in average values across strides.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
4.90%
发文量
2568
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise® features original investigations, clinical studies, and comprehensive reviews on current topics in sports medicine and exercise science. With this leading multidisciplinary journal, exercise physiologists, physiatrists, physical therapists, team physicians, and athletic trainers get a vital exchange of information from basic and applied science, medicine, education, and allied health fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信