关于光生物调节疗法对跑步成绩影响的随机对照试验的元分析。

Q1 Health Professions
International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2024-03-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Ana Paula DO Nascimento, Adriano Valmozino DA Silva, Juliano Casonatto, Andreo Fernando Aguiar
{"title":"关于光生物调节疗法对跑步成绩影响的随机对照试验的元分析。","authors":"Ana Paula DO Nascimento, Adriano Valmozino DA Silva, Juliano Casonatto, Andreo Fernando Aguiar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the effects of Photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy on running performance.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>PBM has recently been advocated as a valuable non-pharmacological ergogenic strategy, however, the efficacy of PBM on running performance remains unproven.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A computerized literature search was conducted until June 2023. The databases searched were PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were determined through the PICO process. The running variables analyzed were time-trial or time-to-exhaustion. Results were combined with the standardized mean differences (SMD) and the 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. No significant effects in favor of PBM were found (SMD = 0.13; <i>p</i> = 0.11). There was no effect considering the presence (SMD = 0.16; <i>p</i> = 0.38) and absence (SMD = 0.11; <i>p</i> = 0.25) of training, and there was no dose-response effect (<i>p</i> = 0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that PBM alone or combined with a training program does not improve running performance in terms of time-trial and time-to-exhaustion testing. More studies involving PBM plus training and doses higher than 1000 J are needed to determine if PBM is effective in improving running performance.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 4","pages":"327-342"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042871/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Effects of Photobiomodulation Therapy on Running Performance.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Paula DO Nascimento, Adriano Valmozino DA Silva, Juliano Casonatto, Andreo Fernando Aguiar\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the effects of Photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy on running performance.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>PBM has recently been advocated as a valuable non-pharmacological ergogenic strategy, however, the efficacy of PBM on running performance remains unproven.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A computerized literature search was conducted until June 2023. The databases searched were PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were determined through the PICO process. The running variables analyzed were time-trial or time-to-exhaustion. Results were combined with the standardized mean differences (SMD) and the 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. No significant effects in favor of PBM were found (SMD = 0.13; <i>p</i> = 0.11). There was no effect considering the presence (SMD = 0.16; <i>p</i> = 0.38) and absence (SMD = 0.11; <i>p</i> = 0.25) of training, and there was no dose-response effect (<i>p</i> = 0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings indicate that PBM alone or combined with a training program does not improve running performance in terms of time-trial and time-to-exhaustion testing. More studies involving PBM plus training and doses higher than 1000 J are needed to determine if PBM is effective in improving running performance.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"volume\":\"17 4\",\"pages\":\"327-342\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042871/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的: 对光生物调节疗法(PBM)对跑步成绩的影响进行荟萃分析:进行一项荟萃分析,研究光生物调控(PBM)疗法对跑步成绩的影响:近来,光生物调控疗法被认为是一种有价值的非药物健身策略,然而,光生物调控疗法对跑步成绩的影响仍未得到证实:方法:对截至 2023 年 6 月的文献进行了计算机检索。检索的数据库包括 PubMed/Medline、Embase、Scopus、SPORTDiscus 和 Web of Science。通过 PICO 流程确定了纳入/排除标准。分析的跑步变量为时间试验或耗尽时间。结果与标准化平均差(SMD)和 95% 置信区间相结合:结果:12 项研究符合纳入标准。结果:12 项研究符合纳入标准,没有发现有利于 PBM 的明显效果(SMD = 0.13;P = 0.11)。考虑到存在(SMD = 0.16;p = 0.38)和不存在(SMD = 0.11;p = 0.25)培训,没有发现效果,也没有发现剂量反应效应(p = 0.82):我们的研究结果表明,在计时测试和耗竭时间测试方面,PBM 单独或与训练计划相结合并不能提高跑步成绩。要确定 PBM 是否能有效提高跑步成绩,还需要更多涉及 PBM 加训练和剂量高于 1000 J 的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Effects of Photobiomodulation Therapy on Running Performance.

Objective: To conduct a meta-analysis to investigate the effects of Photobiomodulation (PBM) therapy on running performance.

Introduction: PBM has recently been advocated as a valuable non-pharmacological ergogenic strategy, however, the efficacy of PBM on running performance remains unproven.

Methods: A computerized literature search was conducted until June 2023. The databases searched were PubMed/Medline, Embase, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, and Web of Science. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were determined through the PICO process. The running variables analyzed were time-trial or time-to-exhaustion. Results were combined with the standardized mean differences (SMD) and the 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Twelve studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. No significant effects in favor of PBM were found (SMD = 0.13; p = 0.11). There was no effect considering the presence (SMD = 0.16; p = 0.38) and absence (SMD = 0.11; p = 0.25) of training, and there was no dose-response effect (p = 0.82).

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that PBM alone or combined with a training program does not improve running performance in terms of time-trial and time-to-exhaustion testing. More studies involving PBM plus training and doses higher than 1000 J are needed to determine if PBM is effective in improving running performance.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信