低气孔导度下光合作用参数的精确估算:角质层导度和仪器噪声的影响。

IF 2.9 3区 生物学 Q2 PLANT SCIENCES
Photosynthesis Research Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-03 DOI:10.1007/s11120-024-01092-8
Syed Bilal Hussain, Joseph Stinziano, Myrtho O Pierre, Christopher Vincent
{"title":"低气孔导度下光合作用参数的精确估算:角质层导度和仪器噪声的影响。","authors":"Syed Bilal Hussain, Joseph Stinziano, Myrtho O Pierre, Christopher Vincent","doi":"10.1007/s11120-024-01092-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Accurate estimation of photosynthetic parameters is essential for understanding plant physiological limitations and responses to environmental factors from the leaf to the global scale. Gas exchange is a useful tool to measure responses of net CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation (A) to internal CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (C<sub>i</sub>), a necessary step in estimating photosynthetic parameters including the maximum rate of carboxylation (V<sub>cmax</sub>) and the electron transport rate (J<sub>max</sub>). However, species and environmental conditions of low stomatal conductance (g<sub>sw</sub>) reduce the signal-to-noise ratio of gas exchange, challenging estimations of C<sub>i</sub>. Previous works showed that not considering cuticular conductance to water (g<sub>cw</sub>) can lead to significant errors in estimating C<sub>i</sub>, because it has a different effect on total conductance to CO<sub>2</sub> (g<sub>tc</sub>) than does g<sub>sw</sub>. Here we present a systematic assessment of the need for incorporating g<sub>cw</sub> into C<sub>i</sub> estimates. In this study we modeled the effect of g<sub>cw</sub> and of instrumental noise and quantified these effects on photosynthetic parameters in the cases of four species with varying g<sub>sw</sub> and g<sub>cw</sub>, measured using steady-state and constant ramping techniques, like the rapid A/C<sub>i</sub> response method. We show that not accounting for g<sub>cw</sub> quantitatively influences C<sub>i</sub> and the resulting V<sub>cmax</sub> and J<sub>max</sub>, particularly when g<sub>cw</sub> exceeds 7% of the total conductance to water. The influence of g<sub>cw</sub> was not limited to low g<sub>sw</sub> species, highlighting the importance of species-specific knowledge before assessing A/C<sub>i</sub> curves. Furthermore, at low g<sub>sw</sub> instrumental noise can affect C<sub>i</sub> estimation, but the effect of instrumental noise can be minimized using constant-ramping rather than steady-state techniques. By incorporating these considerations, more precise measurements and interpretations of photosynthetic parameters can be obtained in a broader range of species and environmental conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":20130,"journal":{"name":"Photosynthesis Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11108943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accurate photosynthetic parameter estimation at low stomatal conductance: effects of cuticular conductance and instrumental noise.\",\"authors\":\"Syed Bilal Hussain, Joseph Stinziano, Myrtho O Pierre, Christopher Vincent\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11120-024-01092-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Accurate estimation of photosynthetic parameters is essential for understanding plant physiological limitations and responses to environmental factors from the leaf to the global scale. Gas exchange is a useful tool to measure responses of net CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation (A) to internal CO<sub>2</sub> concentration (C<sub>i</sub>), a necessary step in estimating photosynthetic parameters including the maximum rate of carboxylation (V<sub>cmax</sub>) and the electron transport rate (J<sub>max</sub>). However, species and environmental conditions of low stomatal conductance (g<sub>sw</sub>) reduce the signal-to-noise ratio of gas exchange, challenging estimations of C<sub>i</sub>. Previous works showed that not considering cuticular conductance to water (g<sub>cw</sub>) can lead to significant errors in estimating C<sub>i</sub>, because it has a different effect on total conductance to CO<sub>2</sub> (g<sub>tc</sub>) than does g<sub>sw</sub>. Here we present a systematic assessment of the need for incorporating g<sub>cw</sub> into C<sub>i</sub> estimates. In this study we modeled the effect of g<sub>cw</sub> and of instrumental noise and quantified these effects on photosynthetic parameters in the cases of four species with varying g<sub>sw</sub> and g<sub>cw</sub>, measured using steady-state and constant ramping techniques, like the rapid A/C<sub>i</sub> response method. We show that not accounting for g<sub>cw</sub> quantitatively influences C<sub>i</sub> and the resulting V<sub>cmax</sub> and J<sub>max</sub>, particularly when g<sub>cw</sub> exceeds 7% of the total conductance to water. The influence of g<sub>cw</sub> was not limited to low g<sub>sw</sub> species, highlighting the importance of species-specific knowledge before assessing A/C<sub>i</sub> curves. Furthermore, at low g<sub>sw</sub> instrumental noise can affect C<sub>i</sub> estimation, but the effect of instrumental noise can be minimized using constant-ramping rather than steady-state techniques. By incorporating these considerations, more precise measurements and interpretations of photosynthetic parameters can be obtained in a broader range of species and environmental conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20130,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Photosynthesis Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11108943/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Photosynthesis Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-024-01092-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/3 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PLANT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photosynthesis Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11120-024-01092-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

准确估算光合作用参数对于了解植物的生理限制和对从叶片到全球范围的环境因素的反应至关重要。气体交换是测量净二氧化碳同化(A)对内部二氧化碳浓度(Ci)反应的有用工具,是估算光合作用参数(包括最大羧化速率(Vcmax)和电子传输速率(Jmax))的必要步骤。然而,气孔导度(gsw)较低的物种和环境条件会降低气体交换的信噪比,从而给 Ci 的估算带来挑战。之前的研究表明,不考虑水的角质传导(gcw)会导致 Ci 估算出现重大误差,因为它对二氧化碳总传导(gtc)的影响不同于气孔导度。在此,我们对将 gcw 纳入 Ci 估算值的必要性进行了系统评估。在这项研究中,我们模拟了 gcw 和仪器噪声的影响,并量化了这些影响对四种物种光合作用参数的影响,这些物种的 gsw 和 gcw 各不相同,我们采用稳态和恒定斜坡技术(如快速 A/Ci 响应法)进行测量。我们发现,不考虑 gcw 会对 Ci 以及由此产生的 Vcmax 和 Jmax 产生定量影响,尤其是当 gcw 超过水总传导量的 7% 时。gcw 的影响并不局限于低 gsw 物种,这凸显了在评估 A/Ci 曲线之前了解特定物种的重要性。此外,在低 gsw 条件下,仪器噪声会影响 Ci 的估算,但使用恒定振幅而非稳态技术可将仪器噪声的影响降至最低。考虑到这些因素,可以在更广泛的物种和环境条件下获得更精确的光合作用参数测量和解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Accurate photosynthetic parameter estimation at low stomatal conductance: effects of cuticular conductance and instrumental noise.

Accurate photosynthetic parameter estimation at low stomatal conductance: effects of cuticular conductance and instrumental noise.

Accurate estimation of photosynthetic parameters is essential for understanding plant physiological limitations and responses to environmental factors from the leaf to the global scale. Gas exchange is a useful tool to measure responses of net CO2 assimilation (A) to internal CO2 concentration (Ci), a necessary step in estimating photosynthetic parameters including the maximum rate of carboxylation (Vcmax) and the electron transport rate (Jmax). However, species and environmental conditions of low stomatal conductance (gsw) reduce the signal-to-noise ratio of gas exchange, challenging estimations of Ci. Previous works showed that not considering cuticular conductance to water (gcw) can lead to significant errors in estimating Ci, because it has a different effect on total conductance to CO2 (gtc) than does gsw. Here we present a systematic assessment of the need for incorporating gcw into Ci estimates. In this study we modeled the effect of gcw and of instrumental noise and quantified these effects on photosynthetic parameters in the cases of four species with varying gsw and gcw, measured using steady-state and constant ramping techniques, like the rapid A/Ci response method. We show that not accounting for gcw quantitatively influences Ci and the resulting Vcmax and Jmax, particularly when gcw exceeds 7% of the total conductance to water. The influence of gcw was not limited to low gsw species, highlighting the importance of species-specific knowledge before assessing A/Ci curves. Furthermore, at low gsw instrumental noise can affect Ci estimation, but the effect of instrumental noise can be minimized using constant-ramping rather than steady-state techniques. By incorporating these considerations, more precise measurements and interpretations of photosynthetic parameters can be obtained in a broader range of species and environmental conditions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Photosynthesis Research
Photosynthesis Research 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
8.10%
发文量
91
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Photosynthesis Research is an international journal open to papers of merit dealing with both basic and applied aspects of photosynthesis. It covers all aspects of photosynthesis research, including, but not limited to, light absorption and emission, excitation energy transfer, primary photochemistry, model systems, membrane components, protein complexes, electron transport, photophosphorylation, carbon assimilation, regulatory phenomena, molecular biology, environmental and ecological aspects, photorespiration, and bacterial and algal photosynthesis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信