P. Oosterhof, B. G. J. A. de Zoete, J. W. Vanhommerig, N. Langebeek, E. H. Gisolf, A. G. W. van Hulzen, A. J. J. Lammers, A. M. Weijsenfeld, M. van der Valk, K. Grintjes, R. van Crevel, M. van Luin, K. Brinkman, D. M. Burger
{"title":"将抗逆转录病毒疗法从单药片疗法简化为双药片疗法:多中心研究中的接受度、患者报告结果和成本节约。","authors":"P. Oosterhof, B. G. J. A. de Zoete, J. W. Vanhommerig, N. Langebeek, E. H. Gisolf, A. G. W. van Hulzen, A. J. J. Lammers, A. M. Weijsenfeld, M. van der Valk, K. Grintjes, R. van Crevel, M. van Luin, K. Brinkman, D. M. Burger","doi":"10.1111/hiv.13655","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Antiretroviral therapy (ART), which is increasingly used by people with HIV, accounts for significant care costs, particularly because of single-tablet regimens (STRs). This study explored de-simplification to a two-tablet regimen (TTR) for cost reduction. The objectives of this study were: (1) acceptance of de-simplification, (2) patient-reported outcomes, and (3) cost savings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>All individuals on Triumeq®, Atripla® or Eviplera® in five HIV clinics in the Netherlands were eligible. Healthcare providers informed individuals of this study. After inclusion, individuals were free to de-simplify. An electronic questionnaire was sent to assess study acceptance, adherence, quality of life (SF12) and treatment satisfaction (HIVTSQ). After 3 and 12 months, questionnaires were repeated. Cost savings were calculated using Dutch drug prices.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 283 individuals were included, of whom 55.5% agreed to de-simplify their ART, with a large variability between treatment centres: 41.1–74.2%. Individuals who were willing to de-simplify tended to be older, had a longer history of HIV diagnosis, and used more co-medication than those who preferred to remain on an STR regimen. Patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life and treatment satisfaction, showed no significant difference between people with HIV who switched to a TTR and those who remained on an STR regimen. Furthermore, we observed a 17.8% reduction in drug costs in our cohort of people with HIV who were initially on an STR.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>De-simplification from an STR to a TTR within the Dutch healthcare setting has been demonstrated as feasible, leads to significant cost reductions and should be discussed with every eligible person with HIV in the Netherlands.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13176,"journal":{"name":"HIV Medicine","volume":"25 9","pages":"1019-1029"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hiv.13655","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"De-simplifying antiretroviral therapy from a single-tablet to a two-tablet regimen: Acceptance, patient-reported outcomes, and cost savings in a multicentre study\",\"authors\":\"P. Oosterhof, B. G. J. A. de Zoete, J. W. Vanhommerig, N. Langebeek, E. H. Gisolf, A. G. W. van Hulzen, A. J. J. Lammers, A. M. Weijsenfeld, M. van der Valk, K. Grintjes, R. van Crevel, M. van Luin, K. Brinkman, D. M. Burger\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hiv.13655\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Antiretroviral therapy (ART), which is increasingly used by people with HIV, accounts for significant care costs, particularly because of single-tablet regimens (STRs). This study explored de-simplification to a two-tablet regimen (TTR) for cost reduction. The objectives of this study were: (1) acceptance of de-simplification, (2) patient-reported outcomes, and (3) cost savings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>All individuals on Triumeq®, Atripla® or Eviplera® in five HIV clinics in the Netherlands were eligible. Healthcare providers informed individuals of this study. After inclusion, individuals were free to de-simplify. An electronic questionnaire was sent to assess study acceptance, adherence, quality of life (SF12) and treatment satisfaction (HIVTSQ). After 3 and 12 months, questionnaires were repeated. Cost savings were calculated using Dutch drug prices.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In total, 283 individuals were included, of whom 55.5% agreed to de-simplify their ART, with a large variability between treatment centres: 41.1–74.2%. Individuals who were willing to de-simplify tended to be older, had a longer history of HIV diagnosis, and used more co-medication than those who preferred to remain on an STR regimen. Patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life and treatment satisfaction, showed no significant difference between people with HIV who switched to a TTR and those who remained on an STR regimen. Furthermore, we observed a 17.8% reduction in drug costs in our cohort of people with HIV who were initially on an STR.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>De-simplification from an STR to a TTR within the Dutch healthcare setting has been demonstrated as feasible, leads to significant cost reductions and should be discussed with every eligible person with HIV in the Netherlands.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HIV Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 9\",\"pages\":\"1019-1029\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/hiv.13655\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HIV Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hiv.13655\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HIV Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hiv.13655","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:艾滋病病毒感染者越来越多地使用抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART),但这种疗法的护理成本很高,尤其是单药疗法(STR)。本研究探讨了去简化为双药治疗方案(TTR)以降低成本的问题。本研究的目标是(方法:所有在荷兰五家艾滋病诊所接受 Triumeq®、Atripla® 或 Eviplera® 治疗的患者均符合条件。医疗服务提供者向患者告知了这项研究。纳入后,患者可自由去简化。研究人员发送了一份电子问卷,以评估研究接受度、依从性、生活质量(SF12)和治疗满意度(HIVTSQ)。3 个月和 12 个月后,再次进行问卷调查。根据荷兰的药品价格计算了节省的成本:共纳入 283 人,其中 55.5% 的人同意简化抗逆转录病毒疗法,不同治疗中心之间的差异很大:41.1%-74.2%。愿意放弃简化疗法的患者往往年龄较大、艾滋病确诊时间较长,而且与愿意继续接受STR疗法的患者相比,他们使用更多的联合用药。患者报告的结果(包括生活质量和治疗满意度)显示,改用 TTR 方案的 HIV 感染者与仍采用 STR 方案的患者之间没有显著差异。此外,我们还观察到,在最初使用 STR 方案的 HIV 感染者队列中,药物成本降低了 17.8%:结论:在荷兰的医疗环境中,从 STR 方案简化为 TTR 方案已被证明是可行的,可显著降低成本,应与荷兰所有符合条件的 HIV 感染者进行讨论。
De-simplifying antiretroviral therapy from a single-tablet to a two-tablet regimen: Acceptance, patient-reported outcomes, and cost savings in a multicentre study
Background
Antiretroviral therapy (ART), which is increasingly used by people with HIV, accounts for significant care costs, particularly because of single-tablet regimens (STRs). This study explored de-simplification to a two-tablet regimen (TTR) for cost reduction. The objectives of this study were: (1) acceptance of de-simplification, (2) patient-reported outcomes, and (3) cost savings.
Methods
All individuals on Triumeq®, Atripla® or Eviplera® in five HIV clinics in the Netherlands were eligible. Healthcare providers informed individuals of this study. After inclusion, individuals were free to de-simplify. An electronic questionnaire was sent to assess study acceptance, adherence, quality of life (SF12) and treatment satisfaction (HIVTSQ). After 3 and 12 months, questionnaires were repeated. Cost savings were calculated using Dutch drug prices.
Results
In total, 283 individuals were included, of whom 55.5% agreed to de-simplify their ART, with a large variability between treatment centres: 41.1–74.2%. Individuals who were willing to de-simplify tended to be older, had a longer history of HIV diagnosis, and used more co-medication than those who preferred to remain on an STR regimen. Patient-reported outcomes, including quality of life and treatment satisfaction, showed no significant difference between people with HIV who switched to a TTR and those who remained on an STR regimen. Furthermore, we observed a 17.8% reduction in drug costs in our cohort of people with HIV who were initially on an STR.
Conclusions
De-simplification from an STR to a TTR within the Dutch healthcare setting has been demonstrated as feasible, leads to significant cost reductions and should be discussed with every eligible person with HIV in the Netherlands.
期刊介绍:
HIV Medicine aims to provide an alternative outlet for publication of international research papers in the field of HIV Medicine, embracing clinical, pharmocological, epidemiological, ethical, preclinical and in vitro studies. In addition, the journal will commission reviews and other feature articles. It will focus on evidence-based medicine as the mainstay of successful management of HIV and AIDS. The journal is specifically aimed at researchers and clinicians with responsibility for treating HIV seropositive patients.