钆增强心脏磁共振晚期 "暗血 "与 "白血 "的深度学习合成。

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Tim J M Jaspers, Bibi Martens, Richard Crawley, Lamis Jada, Sina Amirrajab, Marcel Breeuwer, Robert J Holtackers, Amedeo Chiribiri, Cian M Scannell
{"title":"钆增强心脏磁共振晚期 \"暗血 \"与 \"白血 \"的深度学习合成。","authors":"Tim J M Jaspers, Bibi Martens, Richard Crawley, Lamis Jada, Sina Amirrajab, Marcel Breeuwer, Robert J Holtackers, Amedeo Chiribiri, Cian M Scannell","doi":"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement (DB-LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance has been proposed as an alternative to standard white-blood LGE (WB-LGE) imaging protocols to enhance scar-to-blood contrast without compromising scar-to-myocardium contrast. In practice, both DB and WB contrasts may have clinical utility, but acquiring both has the drawback of additional acquisition time. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a deep learning method to generate synthetic WB-LGE images from DB-LGE, allowing the assessment of both contrasts without additional scan time.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>DB-LGE and WB-LGE data from 215 patients were used to train 2 types of unpaired image-to-image translation deep learning models, cycle-consistent generative adversarial network (CycleGAN) and contrastive unpaired translation, with 5 different loss function hyperparameter settings each. Initially, the best hyperparameter setting was determined for each model type based on the Fréchet inception distance and the visual assessment of expert readers. Then, the CycleGAN and contrastive unpaired translation models with the optimal hyperparameters were directly compared. Finally, with the best model chosen, the quantification of scar based on the synthetic WB-LGE images was compared with the truly acquired WB-LGE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CycleGAN architecture for unpaired image-to-image translation was found to provide the most realistic synthetic WB-LGE images from DB-LGE images. The results showed that it was difficult for visual readers to distinguish if an image was true or synthetic (55% correctly classified). In addition, scar burden quantification with the synthetic data was highly correlated with the analysis of the truly acquired images. Bland-Altman analysis found a mean bias in percentage scar burden between the quantification of the real WB and synthetic white-blood images of 0.44% with limits of agreement from -10.85% to 11.74%. The mean image quality of the real WB images (3.53/5) was scored higher than the synthetic white-blood images (3.03), P = 0.009.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study proposed a CycleGAN model to generate synthetic WB-LGE from DB-LGE images to allow assessment of both image contrasts without additional scan time. This work represents a clinically focused assessment of synthetic medical images generated by artificial intelligence, a topic with significant potential for a multitude of applications. However, further evaluation is warranted before clinical adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":14486,"journal":{"name":"Investigative Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Deep Learning Synthesis of White-Blood From Dark-Blood Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.\",\"authors\":\"Tim J M Jaspers, Bibi Martens, Richard Crawley, Lamis Jada, Sina Amirrajab, Marcel Breeuwer, Robert J Holtackers, Amedeo Chiribiri, Cian M Scannell\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RLI.0000000000001086\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement (DB-LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance has been proposed as an alternative to standard white-blood LGE (WB-LGE) imaging protocols to enhance scar-to-blood contrast without compromising scar-to-myocardium contrast. In practice, both DB and WB contrasts may have clinical utility, but acquiring both has the drawback of additional acquisition time. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a deep learning method to generate synthetic WB-LGE images from DB-LGE, allowing the assessment of both contrasts without additional scan time.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>DB-LGE and WB-LGE data from 215 patients were used to train 2 types of unpaired image-to-image translation deep learning models, cycle-consistent generative adversarial network (CycleGAN) and contrastive unpaired translation, with 5 different loss function hyperparameter settings each. Initially, the best hyperparameter setting was determined for each model type based on the Fréchet inception distance and the visual assessment of expert readers. Then, the CycleGAN and contrastive unpaired translation models with the optimal hyperparameters were directly compared. Finally, with the best model chosen, the quantification of scar based on the synthetic WB-LGE images was compared with the truly acquired WB-LGE.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The CycleGAN architecture for unpaired image-to-image translation was found to provide the most realistic synthetic WB-LGE images from DB-LGE images. The results showed that it was difficult for visual readers to distinguish if an image was true or synthetic (55% correctly classified). In addition, scar burden quantification with the synthetic data was highly correlated with the analysis of the truly acquired images. Bland-Altman analysis found a mean bias in percentage scar burden between the quantification of the real WB and synthetic white-blood images of 0.44% with limits of agreement from -10.85% to 11.74%. The mean image quality of the real WB images (3.53/5) was scored higher than the synthetic white-blood images (3.03), P = 0.009.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study proposed a CycleGAN model to generate synthetic WB-LGE from DB-LGE images to allow assessment of both image contrasts without additional scan time. This work represents a clinically focused assessment of synthetic medical images generated by artificial intelligence, a topic with significant potential for a multitude of applications. However, further evaluation is warranted before clinical adoption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigative Radiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigative Radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001086\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigative Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000001086","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:暗血晚期钆增强(DB-LGE)心脏磁共振被认为是标准白血 LGE(WB-LGE)成像方案的替代方案,可在不影响瘢痕与心肌对比度的情况下增强瘢痕与血液对比度。在实践中,DB 和 WB 对比度都可能具有临床实用性,但同时获得这两种对比度的缺点是需要额外的采集时间。本研究旨在开发和评估一种深度学习方法,从 DB-LGE 生成合成 WB-LGE 图像,从而在不增加扫描时间的情况下评估两种对比度:来自215名患者的DB-LGE和WB-LGE数据被用于训练2种非配对图像到图像翻译深度学习模型,即循环一致性生成对抗网络(CycleGAN)和对比性非配对翻译,每种模型有5种不同的损失函数超参数设置。最初,根据弗雷谢特起始距离和专家读者的视觉评估,为每种模型类型确定了最佳超参数设置。然后,直接比较采用最佳超参数的 CycleGAN 和对比非配对翻译模型。最后,选择最佳模型,将基于合成 WB-LGE 图像的疤痕量化与真实获取的 WB-LGE 进行比较:结果表明:用于非配对图像到图像转换的 CycleGAN 架构能从 DB-LGE 图像中提供最逼真的合成 WB-LGE 图像。结果显示,肉眼阅读者很难区分图像是真实的还是合成的(55% 正确分类)。此外,合成数据的疤痕负担量化与真实采集图像的分析高度相关。Bland-Altman 分析发现,真实 WB 图像和合成白血图像量化的疤痕负担百分比平均偏差为 0.44%,一致性范围为 -10.85% 到 11.74%。真实 WB 图像的平均图像质量(3.53/5)高于合成白血图像(3.03),P = 0.009:本研究提出了一种 CycleGAN 模型,用于从 DB-LGE 图像生成合成 WB-LGE,从而在不增加扫描时间的情况下评估两种图像对比度。这项工作是对人工智能生成的合成医学影像进行的一项临床重点评估,这一主题在多种应用中具有巨大的潜力。不过,在临床应用之前还需要进一步的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Deep Learning Synthesis of White-Blood From Dark-Blood Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiac Magnetic Resonance.

Objectives: Dark-blood late gadolinium enhancement (DB-LGE) cardiac magnetic resonance has been proposed as an alternative to standard white-blood LGE (WB-LGE) imaging protocols to enhance scar-to-blood contrast without compromising scar-to-myocardium contrast. In practice, both DB and WB contrasts may have clinical utility, but acquiring both has the drawback of additional acquisition time. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a deep learning method to generate synthetic WB-LGE images from DB-LGE, allowing the assessment of both contrasts without additional scan time.

Materials and methods: DB-LGE and WB-LGE data from 215 patients were used to train 2 types of unpaired image-to-image translation deep learning models, cycle-consistent generative adversarial network (CycleGAN) and contrastive unpaired translation, with 5 different loss function hyperparameter settings each. Initially, the best hyperparameter setting was determined for each model type based on the Fréchet inception distance and the visual assessment of expert readers. Then, the CycleGAN and contrastive unpaired translation models with the optimal hyperparameters were directly compared. Finally, with the best model chosen, the quantification of scar based on the synthetic WB-LGE images was compared with the truly acquired WB-LGE.

Results: The CycleGAN architecture for unpaired image-to-image translation was found to provide the most realistic synthetic WB-LGE images from DB-LGE images. The results showed that it was difficult for visual readers to distinguish if an image was true or synthetic (55% correctly classified). In addition, scar burden quantification with the synthetic data was highly correlated with the analysis of the truly acquired images. Bland-Altman analysis found a mean bias in percentage scar burden between the quantification of the real WB and synthetic white-blood images of 0.44% with limits of agreement from -10.85% to 11.74%. The mean image quality of the real WB images (3.53/5) was scored higher than the synthetic white-blood images (3.03), P = 0.009.

Conclusions: This study proposed a CycleGAN model to generate synthetic WB-LGE from DB-LGE images to allow assessment of both image contrasts without additional scan time. This work represents a clinically focused assessment of synthetic medical images generated by artificial intelligence, a topic with significant potential for a multitude of applications. However, further evaluation is warranted before clinical adoption.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Investigative Radiology
Investigative Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
15.10
自引率
16.40%
发文量
188
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Investigative Radiology publishes original, peer-reviewed reports on clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, and related modalities. Emphasis is on early and timely publication. Primarily research-oriented, the journal also includes a wide variety of features of interest to clinical radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信