使用骶髂腰带对腰痛患者平衡能力的影响

IF 1.4 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopedic Reviews Pub Date : 2024-04-30 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.52965/001c.116960
Alan H Daniels, Alexander M Park, David J Lee, Mohammad Daher, Bassel G Diebo, Alexios Carayannopoulos
{"title":"使用骶髂腰带对腰痛患者平衡能力的影响","authors":"Alan H Daniels, Alexander M Park, David J Lee, Mohammad Daher, Bassel G Diebo, Alexios Carayannopoulos","doi":"10.52965/001c.116960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is a common problem which can affect balance and, in turn, increase fall risk. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the impact of a Sacroiliac Belt (SB) on balance and stability in patients with LBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects with LBP and without LBP (\"Asymptomatic\") were enrolled. Baseline balance was assessed using the Berg Balance Scale. In a counterbalanced crossover design, LBP and Asymptomatic subjects were randomized to one of two groups: 1) start with wearing the SB (Serola Biomechanics, Inc.) followed by not wearing the SB or 2) start without wearing the SB followed by wearing the SB. For subjects in both groups, dynamic balance was then assessed using the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) with each leg planted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline balance was worse in LBP subjects (Berg 51/56) than Asymptomatic subjects (Berg 56/56) (p<0.01). SB significantly improved SEBT performance in LBP subjects regardless of which leg was planted (p<0.01). SB positively impacted Asymptomatic subjects' SEBT performance with the left leg planted (p=0.0002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Serola Sacroiliac Belt positively impacted dynamic balance for subjects with low back pain. Further research is needed to examine additional interventions and outcomes related to balance in patients with back pain, and to elucidate the mechanisms behind improvements in balance related to sacroiliac belt utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":19669,"journal":{"name":"Orthopedic Reviews","volume":"16 ","pages":"116960"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11062887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Sacroiliac Belt Utilization on Balance in Patients with Low Back Pain.\",\"authors\":\"Alan H Daniels, Alexander M Park, David J Lee, Mohammad Daher, Bassel G Diebo, Alexios Carayannopoulos\",\"doi\":\"10.52965/001c.116960\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low back pain (LBP) is a common problem which can affect balance and, in turn, increase fall risk. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the impact of a Sacroiliac Belt (SB) on balance and stability in patients with LBP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Subjects with LBP and without LBP (\\\"Asymptomatic\\\") were enrolled. Baseline balance was assessed using the Berg Balance Scale. In a counterbalanced crossover design, LBP and Asymptomatic subjects were randomized to one of two groups: 1) start with wearing the SB (Serola Biomechanics, Inc.) followed by not wearing the SB or 2) start without wearing the SB followed by wearing the SB. For subjects in both groups, dynamic balance was then assessed using the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) with each leg planted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline balance was worse in LBP subjects (Berg 51/56) than Asymptomatic subjects (Berg 56/56) (p<0.01). SB significantly improved SEBT performance in LBP subjects regardless of which leg was planted (p<0.01). SB positively impacted Asymptomatic subjects' SEBT performance with the left leg planted (p=0.0002).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Serola Sacroiliac Belt positively impacted dynamic balance for subjects with low back pain. Further research is needed to examine additional interventions and outcomes related to balance in patients with back pain, and to elucidate the mechanisms behind improvements in balance related to sacroiliac belt utilization.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19669,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Orthopedic Reviews\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"116960\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11062887/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Orthopedic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.116960\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopedic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52965/001c.116960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:腰背痛(LBP)是一种常见问题,会影响平衡,进而增加跌倒风险。本研究旨在评估骶髂腰带(SB)对腰背痛患者平衡和稳定性的影响:方法:招募患有枸杞痛和无枸杞痛("无症状")的受试者。使用伯格平衡量表评估基线平衡。在平衡交叉设计中,枸杞痛和无症状受试者被随机分为两组:1)开始时佩戴 SB(Serola 生物力学公司),随后不佩戴 SB;或 2)开始时不佩戴 SB,随后佩戴 SB。然后,对两组受试者使用星形偏移平衡测试(SEBT)进行动态平衡评估,每条腿都要固定:结果:椎间盘突出症受试者(Berg 51/56)的基线平衡能力比无症状受试者(Berg 56/56)差(p结论:椎间盘突出症受试者的基线平衡能力比无症状受试者差:Serola骶髂腰带对腰痛患者的动态平衡有积极影响。还需要进一步研究,以检查与腰痛患者平衡相关的其他干预措施和结果,并阐明使用骶髂腰带改善平衡背后的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Sacroiliac Belt Utilization on Balance in Patients with Low Back Pain.

Background: Low back pain (LBP) is a common problem which can affect balance and, in turn, increase fall risk. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the impact of a Sacroiliac Belt (SB) on balance and stability in patients with LBP.

Methods: Subjects with LBP and without LBP ("Asymptomatic") were enrolled. Baseline balance was assessed using the Berg Balance Scale. In a counterbalanced crossover design, LBP and Asymptomatic subjects were randomized to one of two groups: 1) start with wearing the SB (Serola Biomechanics, Inc.) followed by not wearing the SB or 2) start without wearing the SB followed by wearing the SB. For subjects in both groups, dynamic balance was then assessed using the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) with each leg planted.

Results: Baseline balance was worse in LBP subjects (Berg 51/56) than Asymptomatic subjects (Berg 56/56) (p<0.01). SB significantly improved SEBT performance in LBP subjects regardless of which leg was planted (p<0.01). SB positively impacted Asymptomatic subjects' SEBT performance with the left leg planted (p=0.0002).

Conclusion: The Serola Sacroiliac Belt positively impacted dynamic balance for subjects with low back pain. Further research is needed to examine additional interventions and outcomes related to balance in patients with back pain, and to elucidate the mechanisms behind improvements in balance related to sacroiliac belt utilization.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Orthopedic Reviews
Orthopedic Reviews ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
122
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopedic Reviews is an Open Access, online-only, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles concerned with any aspect of orthopedics, as well as diagnosis and treatment, trauma, surgical procedures, arthroscopy, sports medicine, rehabilitation, pediatric and geriatric orthopedics. All bone-related molecular and cell biology, genetics, pathophysiology and epidemiology papers are also welcome. The journal publishes original articles, brief reports, reviews and case reports of general interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信