大学女运动员下肢自我肌筋膜松弛术对姿势摇摆的急性影响。

Q1 Health Professions
International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2024-02-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01
Mackenzie L Melton, Andrew L Shim, Monica Dial, Guilherme M Cesar
{"title":"大学女运动员下肢自我肌筋膜松弛术对姿势摇摆的急性影响。","authors":"Mackenzie L Melton, Andrew L Shim, Monica Dial, Guilherme M Cesar","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Myofascial release is a popular therapy technique used to manipulate connective muscle tissue to become more pliable. The maintenance of body posture relies on mechanoreceptors located in connective tissue, thus manipulation of connective tissue should affect postural control. The effects of this phenomenon have not been well studied, leaving room for this investigation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To observe if postural sway scores changed before and after foam rolling proximal (quadriceps and hamstrings) in comparison to distal (calves) muscles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-six, college-aged female athletes (age 20.39 ± 0.25 years, mass 68.70 ± 1.97 kg, height 170.18 ± 1.56 cm.) performed approximately two and one-half minutes of moderate intensity foam rolling to their calves (<i>n</i> = 19, Group A) or to their hamstrings and quadricep muscle (<i>n</i> = 17, Group B). Center of Pressure (CoP) and Limit of Stability (LoS) testing was assessed both pre- and post-foam rolling using a computerized posturography balance plate. CoP sway was measured under both eyes open (EO) and eye closed (EC) Conditions on both stable and unstable surfaces. LoS was measured in the Anterior, Posterior, Left, and Right Directions. Effects of foam rolling on CoP and LoS were assessed using a repeated-measures MANOVA (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eyes Open Stable Surface had the lowest postural sway (<i>p</i> = 0.001). However, CoP did not differ for any condition either between Groups (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.6) or from pre- to post-foam rolling (<i>p</i> = 0.3). LoS significantly differed between Directions such that LoS was greater in the frontal plane than in the sagittal plane (<i>p</i> = 0.011). There was also a significant Time X Group X Direction interaction effect (<i>p</i> = 0.001) such that LoS for Group A decreased after foam rolling (mean change = -1.621 cm) but increased for Group B after foam rolling (mean change = + 0.878 cm). No differences were found for any other Direction (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated CoP and LoS improvements between the two groups based on acute effects of foam rolling intervention. Further research is suggested to determine if long-term gains are observed within or between groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"17 1","pages":"274-284"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042852/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Acute Effects in Postural Sway as a Result of Self-Myofascial Release on the Lower Extremities in Collegiate Female Athletes.\",\"authors\":\"Mackenzie L Melton, Andrew L Shim, Monica Dial, Guilherme M Cesar\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Myofascial release is a popular therapy technique used to manipulate connective muscle tissue to become more pliable. The maintenance of body posture relies on mechanoreceptors located in connective tissue, thus manipulation of connective tissue should affect postural control. The effects of this phenomenon have not been well studied, leaving room for this investigation.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To observe if postural sway scores changed before and after foam rolling proximal (quadriceps and hamstrings) in comparison to distal (calves) muscles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-six, college-aged female athletes (age 20.39 ± 0.25 years, mass 68.70 ± 1.97 kg, height 170.18 ± 1.56 cm.) performed approximately two and one-half minutes of moderate intensity foam rolling to their calves (<i>n</i> = 19, Group A) or to their hamstrings and quadricep muscle (<i>n</i> = 17, Group B). Center of Pressure (CoP) and Limit of Stability (LoS) testing was assessed both pre- and post-foam rolling using a computerized posturography balance plate. CoP sway was measured under both eyes open (EO) and eye closed (EC) Conditions on both stable and unstable surfaces. LoS was measured in the Anterior, Posterior, Left, and Right Directions. Effects of foam rolling on CoP and LoS were assessed using a repeated-measures MANOVA (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eyes Open Stable Surface had the lowest postural sway (<i>p</i> = 0.001). However, CoP did not differ for any condition either between Groups (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.6) or from pre- to post-foam rolling (<i>p</i> = 0.3). LoS significantly differed between Directions such that LoS was greater in the frontal plane than in the sagittal plane (<i>p</i> = 0.011). There was also a significant Time X Group X Direction interaction effect (<i>p</i> = 0.001) such that LoS for Group A decreased after foam rolling (mean change = -1.621 cm) but increased for Group B after foam rolling (mean change = + 0.878 cm). No differences were found for any other Direction (<i>p</i> ≥ 0.1).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated CoP and LoS improvements between the two groups based on acute effects of foam rolling intervention. Further research is suggested to determine if long-term gains are observed within or between groups.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"274-284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11042852/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

肌筋膜松解术是一种流行的治疗技术,用于操作结缔组织使其变得更加柔韧。身体姿势的保持依赖于结缔组织中的机械感受器,因此对结缔组织的操作应该会影响姿势控制。目的:观察泡沫滚动近端肌肉(股四头肌和腘绳肌)与远端肌肉(小腿)前后相比,姿势摇摆评分是否发生变化:36 名大学年龄的女运动员(年龄 20.39 ± 0.25 岁,体重 68.70 ± 1.97 千克,身高 170.18 ± 1.56 厘米)对小腿(n = 19,A 组)或腘绳肌和股四头肌(n = 17,B 组)进行了约两分半钟的中等强度泡沫滚动。压力中心(CoP)和稳定极限(LoS)测试在泡沫滚动前后均使用计算机化体位测量平衡板进行评估。在睁眼(EO)和闭眼(EC)状态下,在稳定和不稳定表面上测量 CoP 摇摆。LoS在前方、后方、左侧和右侧方向进行测量。使用重复测量 MANOVA(α = 0.05)评估了泡沫滚动对 CoP 和 LoS 的影响:结果:睁眼稳定面的姿势摇摆最小(p = 0.001)。然而,在任何情况下,CoP 在不同组之间(p ≥ 0.6)或从泡沫滚动前到泡沫滚动后(p = 0.3)都没有差异。不同方向的 LoS 有明显差异,额面的 LoS 大于矢状面的 LoS(p = 0.011)。时间 X 组别 X 方向的交互效应也很明显(p = 0.001),A 组的 LoS 在泡沫滚动后有所下降(平均变化 = -1.621 厘米),但 B 组的 LoS 在泡沫滚动后有所上升(平均变化 = + 0.878 厘米)。其他方向均无差异(P≥0.1):本研究表明,基于泡沫滚揉干预的急性效果,两组之间的 CoP 和 LoS 均有所改善。建议开展进一步研究,以确定是否在组内或组间观察到长期收益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Acute Effects in Postural Sway as a Result of Self-Myofascial Release on the Lower Extremities in Collegiate Female Athletes.

Myofascial release is a popular therapy technique used to manipulate connective muscle tissue to become more pliable. The maintenance of body posture relies on mechanoreceptors located in connective tissue, thus manipulation of connective tissue should affect postural control. The effects of this phenomenon have not been well studied, leaving room for this investigation.

Purpose: To observe if postural sway scores changed before and after foam rolling proximal (quadriceps and hamstrings) in comparison to distal (calves) muscles.

Methods: Thirty-six, college-aged female athletes (age 20.39 ± 0.25 years, mass 68.70 ± 1.97 kg, height 170.18 ± 1.56 cm.) performed approximately two and one-half minutes of moderate intensity foam rolling to their calves (n = 19, Group A) or to their hamstrings and quadricep muscle (n = 17, Group B). Center of Pressure (CoP) and Limit of Stability (LoS) testing was assessed both pre- and post-foam rolling using a computerized posturography balance plate. CoP sway was measured under both eyes open (EO) and eye closed (EC) Conditions on both stable and unstable surfaces. LoS was measured in the Anterior, Posterior, Left, and Right Directions. Effects of foam rolling on CoP and LoS were assessed using a repeated-measures MANOVA (α = 0.05).

Results: Eyes Open Stable Surface had the lowest postural sway (p = 0.001). However, CoP did not differ for any condition either between Groups (p ≥ 0.6) or from pre- to post-foam rolling (p = 0.3). LoS significantly differed between Directions such that LoS was greater in the frontal plane than in the sagittal plane (p = 0.011). There was also a significant Time X Group X Direction interaction effect (p = 0.001) such that LoS for Group A decreased after foam rolling (mean change = -1.621 cm) but increased for Group B after foam rolling (mean change = + 0.878 cm). No differences were found for any other Direction (p ≥ 0.1).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated CoP and LoS improvements between the two groups based on acute effects of foam rolling intervention. Further research is suggested to determine if long-term gains are observed within or between groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信