腰围和腰围身高比对 5 岁以下儿童中度和严重急性营养不良的诊断准确性。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Indian pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-07-15 Epub Date: 2024-04-05
Vaishali Sharma, Sumaira Khalil, Dheeraj Shah, Piyush Gupta
{"title":"腰围和腰围身高比对 5 岁以下儿童中度和严重急性营养不良的诊断准确性。","authors":"Vaishali Sharma, Sumaira Khalil, Dheeraj Shah, Piyush Gupta","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the most appropriate cut-off values of Waist Circumference (WC) and Waist-to-Height Ratio (WHtR) for diagnosing moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) and severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in under-five children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study was conducted between January 2021 and August 2022 in the Department of Pediatrics of a tertiary hospital in Delhi. Children aged 6 months to 5 years attending the outpatient or emergency services were included in the study. Detailed clinical evaluation and anthropometry including measurement of WC were done at enrollment. Body mass index (BMI) and WHtR were calculated. Malnutrition was classified as per the WHO criteria. Receiver operating characteristic curves (sensitivity, specificity) for WC and WHtR (absolute values) were drawn against the standard test of WHO definitions for MAM and SAM to determine the most appropriate cut-offs for diagnosing MAM and SAM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1500 children with a median (IQR) age of 29 (14, 43) months were enrolled; 21% children had MAM and 11% had SAM as per the WHO criteria. WC < 44.5 cm (sensitivity 74.1%, specificity 71.1%) and WHtR < 0.565 (sensitivity 75.6%, specificity 33.7%) were the best cut-offs to identify MAM, whereas WC < 42.3 cm (sensitivity 67.5%, specificity 81.3%) and WHtR < 0.563 (sensitivity 81.3%, specificity 33.4%) were the best cut-offs to diagnose SAM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Waist circumference (< 44.5 cm for MAM; < 42.3 cm for SAM) had a reasonably good sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing MAM and SAM, but the same was not true for WHtR.</p>","PeriodicalId":13291,"journal":{"name":"Indian pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"643-648"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic Accuracy of Waist Circumference and Waist-to-Height Ratio for Moderate and Severe Acute Malnutrition in Under-5 Children.\",\"authors\":\"Vaishali Sharma, Sumaira Khalil, Dheeraj Shah, Piyush Gupta\",\"doi\":\"\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the most appropriate cut-off values of Waist Circumference (WC) and Waist-to-Height Ratio (WHtR) for diagnosing moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) and severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in under-five children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study was conducted between January 2021 and August 2022 in the Department of Pediatrics of a tertiary hospital in Delhi. Children aged 6 months to 5 years attending the outpatient or emergency services were included in the study. Detailed clinical evaluation and anthropometry including measurement of WC were done at enrollment. Body mass index (BMI) and WHtR were calculated. Malnutrition was classified as per the WHO criteria. Receiver operating characteristic curves (sensitivity, specificity) for WC and WHtR (absolute values) were drawn against the standard test of WHO definitions for MAM and SAM to determine the most appropriate cut-offs for diagnosing MAM and SAM.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1500 children with a median (IQR) age of 29 (14, 43) months were enrolled; 21% children had MAM and 11% had SAM as per the WHO criteria. WC < 44.5 cm (sensitivity 74.1%, specificity 71.1%) and WHtR < 0.565 (sensitivity 75.6%, specificity 33.7%) were the best cut-offs to identify MAM, whereas WC < 42.3 cm (sensitivity 67.5%, specificity 81.3%) and WHtR < 0.563 (sensitivity 81.3%, specificity 33.4%) were the best cut-offs to diagnose SAM.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Waist circumference (< 44.5 cm for MAM; < 42.3 cm for SAM) had a reasonably good sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing MAM and SAM, but the same was not true for WHtR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian pediatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"643-648\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian pediatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的确定诊断五岁以下儿童中度急性营养不良(MAM)和重度急性营养不良(SAM)最合适的腰围(WC)和腰围身高比(WHtR)临界值:这项横断面诊断准确性研究于 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 8 月在德里一家三级医院的儿科进行。研究对象包括 6 个月至 5 岁的门诊或急诊儿童。入院时进行了详细的临床评估和人体测量,包括测量体重指数(WC)。计算体重指数(BMI)和WHtR。营养不良按照世界卫生组织的标准进行分类。根据世界卫生组织对营养不良和营养失调的定义的标准测试,绘制了 WC 和 WHtR(绝对值)的接收者操作特征曲线(灵敏度、特异性),以确定诊断营养不良和营养失调的最合适临界值:根据世界卫生组织的标准,1500 名中位数(IQR)年龄为 29(14,43)个月的儿童中有 21% 患有 MAM,11% 患有 SAM。腰围<44.5厘米(灵敏度74.1%,特异度71.1%)和WHtR<0.565(灵敏度75.6%,特异度33.7%)是识别MAM的最佳临界值,而腰围<42.3厘米(灵敏度67.5%,特异度81.3%)和WHtR<0.563(灵敏度81.3%,特异度33.4%)是诊断SAM的最佳临界值:结论:腰围(MAM<44.5厘米;SAM<42.3厘米)对诊断MAM和SAM具有相当好的灵敏度和特异性,但WHtR的灵敏度和特异性则不尽相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic Accuracy of Waist Circumference and Waist-to-Height Ratio for Moderate and Severe Acute Malnutrition in Under-5 Children.

Objective: To determine the most appropriate cut-off values of Waist Circumference (WC) and Waist-to-Height Ratio (WHtR) for diagnosing moderate acute malnutrition (MAM) and severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in under-five children.

Methods: This cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study was conducted between January 2021 and August 2022 in the Department of Pediatrics of a tertiary hospital in Delhi. Children aged 6 months to 5 years attending the outpatient or emergency services were included in the study. Detailed clinical evaluation and anthropometry including measurement of WC were done at enrollment. Body mass index (BMI) and WHtR were calculated. Malnutrition was classified as per the WHO criteria. Receiver operating characteristic curves (sensitivity, specificity) for WC and WHtR (absolute values) were drawn against the standard test of WHO definitions for MAM and SAM to determine the most appropriate cut-offs for diagnosing MAM and SAM.

Results: 1500 children with a median (IQR) age of 29 (14, 43) months were enrolled; 21% children had MAM and 11% had SAM as per the WHO criteria. WC < 44.5 cm (sensitivity 74.1%, specificity 71.1%) and WHtR < 0.565 (sensitivity 75.6%, specificity 33.7%) were the best cut-offs to identify MAM, whereas WC < 42.3 cm (sensitivity 67.5%, specificity 81.3%) and WHtR < 0.563 (sensitivity 81.3%, specificity 33.4%) were the best cut-offs to diagnose SAM.

Conclusion: Waist circumference (< 44.5 cm for MAM; < 42.3 cm for SAM) had a reasonably good sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing MAM and SAM, but the same was not true for WHtR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian pediatrics
Indian pediatrics 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
8.70%
发文量
344
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The general objective of Indian Pediatrics is "To promote the science and practice of Pediatrics." An important guiding principle has been the simultaneous need to inform, educate and entertain the target audience. The specific key objectives are: -To publish original, relevant, well researched peer reviewed articles on issues related to child health. -To provide continuing education to support informed clinical decisions and research. -To foster responsible and balanced debate on controversial issues that affect child health, including non-clinical areas such as medical education, ethics, law, environment and economics. -To achieve the highest level of ethical medical journalism and to produce a publication that is timely, credible and enjoyable to read.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信