语言成分神经定位的包容性多元方法。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Brain Structure & Function Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1007/s00429-024-02800-9
William W Graves, Hillary J Levinson, Ryan Staples, Olga Boukrina, David Rothlein, Jeremy Purcell
{"title":"语言成分神经定位的包容性多元方法。","authors":"William W Graves, Hillary J Levinson, Ryan Staples, Olga Boukrina, David Rothlein, Jeremy Purcell","doi":"10.1007/s00429-024-02800-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To determine how language is implemented in the brain, it is important to know which brain areas are primarily engaged in language processing and which are not. Existing protocols for localizing language are typically univariate, treating each small unit of brain volume as independent. One prominent example that focuses on the overall language network in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) uses a contrast between neural responses to sentences and sets of pseudowords (pronounceable nonwords). This contrast reliably activates peri-sylvian language areas but is less sensitive to extra-sylvian areas that are also known to support aspects of language such as word meanings (semantics). In this study, we assess areas where a multivariate, pattern-based approach shows high reproducibility across multiple measurements and participants, identifying these areas as multivariate regions of interest (mROI). We then perform a representational similarity analysis (RSA) of an fMRI dataset where participants made familiarity judgments on written words. We also compare those results to univariate regions of interest (uROI) taken from previous sentences > pseudowords contrasts. RSA with word stimuli defined in terms of their semantic distance showed greater correspondence with neural patterns in mROI than uROI. This was confirmed in two independent datasets, one involving single-word recognition, and the other focused on the meaning of noun-noun phrases by contrasting meaningful phrases > pseudowords. In all cases, areas of spatial overlap between mROI and uROI showed the greatest neural association. This suggests that ROIs defined in terms of multivariate reproducibility can help localize components of language such as semantics. The multivariate approach can also be extended to focus on other aspects of language such as phonology, and can be used along with the univariate approach for inclusively mapping language cortex.</p>","PeriodicalId":9145,"journal":{"name":"Brain Structure & Function","volume":" ","pages":"1243-1263"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11147878/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An inclusive multivariate approach to neural localization of language components.\",\"authors\":\"William W Graves, Hillary J Levinson, Ryan Staples, Olga Boukrina, David Rothlein, Jeremy Purcell\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00429-024-02800-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To determine how language is implemented in the brain, it is important to know which brain areas are primarily engaged in language processing and which are not. Existing protocols for localizing language are typically univariate, treating each small unit of brain volume as independent. One prominent example that focuses on the overall language network in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) uses a contrast between neural responses to sentences and sets of pseudowords (pronounceable nonwords). This contrast reliably activates peri-sylvian language areas but is less sensitive to extra-sylvian areas that are also known to support aspects of language such as word meanings (semantics). In this study, we assess areas where a multivariate, pattern-based approach shows high reproducibility across multiple measurements and participants, identifying these areas as multivariate regions of interest (mROI). We then perform a representational similarity analysis (RSA) of an fMRI dataset where participants made familiarity judgments on written words. We also compare those results to univariate regions of interest (uROI) taken from previous sentences > pseudowords contrasts. RSA with word stimuli defined in terms of their semantic distance showed greater correspondence with neural patterns in mROI than uROI. This was confirmed in two independent datasets, one involving single-word recognition, and the other focused on the meaning of noun-noun phrases by contrasting meaningful phrases > pseudowords. In all cases, areas of spatial overlap between mROI and uROI showed the greatest neural association. This suggests that ROIs defined in terms of multivariate reproducibility can help localize components of language such as semantics. The multivariate approach can also be extended to focus on other aspects of language such as phonology, and can be used along with the univariate approach for inclusively mapping language cortex.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Structure & Function\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1243-1263\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11147878/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Structure & Function\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-024-02800-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/5/2 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Structure & Function","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00429-024-02800-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

要确定语言是如何在大脑中实现的,就必须知道哪些脑区主要参与语言处理,哪些不参与。现有的语言定位方案通常是单变量的,将每个小的脑容量单位视为独立的。功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)的一个突出例子是将神经对句子和假词(可发音的非词)集的反应进行对比,从而关注整体语言网络。这种对比能可靠地激活偏外侧周围的语言区域,但对偏外侧区域的敏感度较低,而已知偏外侧区域也支持词义(语义)等语言方面。在本研究中,我们评估了基于模式的多元方法在多次测量和参与者中显示出高度可重复性的区域,并将这些区域确定为多元兴趣区域(mROI)。然后,我们对参与者对书面文字进行熟悉度判断的 fMRI 数据集进行表征相似性分析(RSA)。我们还将这些结果与之前的句子 > 伪词对比中得出的单变量兴趣区域(uROI)进行了比较。与 uROI 相比,根据语义距离定义的单词刺激 RSA 与 mROI 中的神经模式显示出更高的对应性。这一点在两个独立的数据集中得到了证实,其中一个数据集涉及单词识别,另一个数据集则通过对比有意义的短语 > 伪词,重点研究名词-名词短语的意义。在所有情况下,mROI 和 uROI 的空间重叠区域都显示出最大的神经关联。这表明,根据多元再现性定义的 ROI 可以帮助定位语义等语言成分。多变量方法还可扩展到语言的其他方面,如语音学,并可与单变量方法一起用于绘制语言皮层图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

An inclusive multivariate approach to neural localization of language components.

An inclusive multivariate approach to neural localization of language components.

To determine how language is implemented in the brain, it is important to know which brain areas are primarily engaged in language processing and which are not. Existing protocols for localizing language are typically univariate, treating each small unit of brain volume as independent. One prominent example that focuses on the overall language network in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) uses a contrast between neural responses to sentences and sets of pseudowords (pronounceable nonwords). This contrast reliably activates peri-sylvian language areas but is less sensitive to extra-sylvian areas that are also known to support aspects of language such as word meanings (semantics). In this study, we assess areas where a multivariate, pattern-based approach shows high reproducibility across multiple measurements and participants, identifying these areas as multivariate regions of interest (mROI). We then perform a representational similarity analysis (RSA) of an fMRI dataset where participants made familiarity judgments on written words. We also compare those results to univariate regions of interest (uROI) taken from previous sentences > pseudowords contrasts. RSA with word stimuli defined in terms of their semantic distance showed greater correspondence with neural patterns in mROI than uROI. This was confirmed in two independent datasets, one involving single-word recognition, and the other focused on the meaning of noun-noun phrases by contrasting meaningful phrases > pseudowords. In all cases, areas of spatial overlap between mROI and uROI showed the greatest neural association. This suggests that ROIs defined in terms of multivariate reproducibility can help localize components of language such as semantics. The multivariate approach can also be extended to focus on other aspects of language such as phonology, and can be used along with the univariate approach for inclusively mapping language cortex.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Structure & Function
Brain Structure & Function 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.50%
发文量
168
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: Brain Structure & Function publishes research that provides insight into brain structure−function relationships. Studies published here integrate data spanning from molecular, cellular, developmental, and systems architecture to the neuroanatomy of behavior and cognitive functions. Manuscripts with focus on the spinal cord or the peripheral nervous system are not accepted for publication. Manuscripts with focus on diseases, animal models of diseases, or disease-related mechanisms are only considered for publication, if the findings provide novel insight into the organization and mechanisms of normal brain structure and function.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信