植物-蜂鸟授粉系统的宏观进化。

IF 11 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Elisa Barreto, Mannfred M. A. Boehm, Ezgi Ogutcen, Stefan Abrahamczyk, Michael Kessler, Jordi Bascompte, Agnes S. Dellinger, Carolina Bello, D. Matthias Dehling, François Duchenne, Miriam Kaehler, Laura P. Lagomarsino, Lúcia G. Lohmann, María A. Maglianesi, Hélène Morlon, Nathan Muchhala, Juan Francisco Ornelas, Mathieu Perret, Nelson R. Salinas, Stacey D. Smith, Jana C. Vamosi, Isabela G. Varassin, Catherine H. Graham
{"title":"植物-蜂鸟授粉系统的宏观进化。","authors":"Elisa Barreto,&nbsp;Mannfred M. A. Boehm,&nbsp;Ezgi Ogutcen,&nbsp;Stefan Abrahamczyk,&nbsp;Michael Kessler,&nbsp;Jordi Bascompte,&nbsp;Agnes S. Dellinger,&nbsp;Carolina Bello,&nbsp;D. Matthias Dehling,&nbsp;François Duchenne,&nbsp;Miriam Kaehler,&nbsp;Laura P. Lagomarsino,&nbsp;Lúcia G. Lohmann,&nbsp;María A. Maglianesi,&nbsp;Hélène Morlon,&nbsp;Nathan Muchhala,&nbsp;Juan Francisco Ornelas,&nbsp;Mathieu Perret,&nbsp;Nelson R. Salinas,&nbsp;Stacey D. Smith,&nbsp;Jana C. Vamosi,&nbsp;Isabela G. Varassin,&nbsp;Catherine H. Graham","doi":"10.1111/brv.13094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Plant–hummingbird interactions are considered a classic example of coevolution, a process in which mutually dependent species influence each other's evolution. Plants depend on hummingbirds for pollination, whereas hummingbirds rely on nectar for food. As a step towards understanding coevolution, this review focuses on the macroevolutionary consequences of plant–hummingbird interactions, a relatively underexplored area in the current literature. We synthesize prior studies, illustrating the origins and dynamics of hummingbird pollination across different angiosperm clades previously pollinated by insects (mostly bees), bats, and passerine birds. In some cases, the crown age of hummingbirds pre-dates the plants they pollinate. In other cases, plant groups transitioned to hummingbird pollination early in the establishment of this bird group in the Americas, with the build-up of both diversities coinciding temporally, and hence suggesting co-diversification. Determining what triggers shifts to and away from hummingbird pollination remains a major open challenge. The impact of hummingbirds on plant diversification is complex, with many tropical plant lineages experiencing increased diversification after acquiring flowers that attract hummingbirds, and others experiencing no change or even a decrease in diversification rates. This mixed evidence suggests that other extrinsic or intrinsic factors, such as local climate and isolation, are important covariables driving the diversification of plants adapted to hummingbird pollination. To guide future studies, we discuss the mechanisms and contexts under which hummingbirds, as a clade and as individual species (e.g. traits, foraging behaviour, degree of specialization), could influence plant evolution. We conclude by commenting on how macroevolutionary signals of the mutualism could relate to coevolution, highlighting the unbalanced focus on the plant side of the interaction, and advocating for the use of species-level interaction data in macroevolutionary studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":"99 5","pages":"1831-1847"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/brv.13094","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Macroevolution of the plant–hummingbird pollination system\",\"authors\":\"Elisa Barreto,&nbsp;Mannfred M. A. Boehm,&nbsp;Ezgi Ogutcen,&nbsp;Stefan Abrahamczyk,&nbsp;Michael Kessler,&nbsp;Jordi Bascompte,&nbsp;Agnes S. Dellinger,&nbsp;Carolina Bello,&nbsp;D. Matthias Dehling,&nbsp;François Duchenne,&nbsp;Miriam Kaehler,&nbsp;Laura P. Lagomarsino,&nbsp;Lúcia G. Lohmann,&nbsp;María A. Maglianesi,&nbsp;Hélène Morlon,&nbsp;Nathan Muchhala,&nbsp;Juan Francisco Ornelas,&nbsp;Mathieu Perret,&nbsp;Nelson R. Salinas,&nbsp;Stacey D. Smith,&nbsp;Jana C. Vamosi,&nbsp;Isabela G. Varassin,&nbsp;Catherine H. Graham\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/brv.13094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Plant–hummingbird interactions are considered a classic example of coevolution, a process in which mutually dependent species influence each other's evolution. Plants depend on hummingbirds for pollination, whereas hummingbirds rely on nectar for food. As a step towards understanding coevolution, this review focuses on the macroevolutionary consequences of plant–hummingbird interactions, a relatively underexplored area in the current literature. We synthesize prior studies, illustrating the origins and dynamics of hummingbird pollination across different angiosperm clades previously pollinated by insects (mostly bees), bats, and passerine birds. In some cases, the crown age of hummingbirds pre-dates the plants they pollinate. In other cases, plant groups transitioned to hummingbird pollination early in the establishment of this bird group in the Americas, with the build-up of both diversities coinciding temporally, and hence suggesting co-diversification. Determining what triggers shifts to and away from hummingbird pollination remains a major open challenge. The impact of hummingbirds on plant diversification is complex, with many tropical plant lineages experiencing increased diversification after acquiring flowers that attract hummingbirds, and others experiencing no change or even a decrease in diversification rates. This mixed evidence suggests that other extrinsic or intrinsic factors, such as local climate and isolation, are important covariables driving the diversification of plants adapted to hummingbird pollination. To guide future studies, we discuss the mechanisms and contexts under which hummingbirds, as a clade and as individual species (e.g. traits, foraging behaviour, degree of specialization), could influence plant evolution. We conclude by commenting on how macroevolutionary signals of the mutualism could relate to coevolution, highlighting the unbalanced focus on the plant side of the interaction, and advocating for the use of species-level interaction data in macroevolutionary studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Reviews\",\"volume\":\"99 5\",\"pages\":\"1831-1847\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/brv.13094\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.13094\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.13094","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植物与蜂鸟之间的互动被认为是共同进化的一个典型例子,在共同进化过程中,相互依赖的物种会影响彼此的进化。植物依赖蜂鸟授粉,而蜂鸟则以花蜜为食。作为理解协同进化的一个步骤,本综述将重点放在植物与蜂鸟之间相互作用的宏观进化后果上,这是目前文献中相对欠缺探索的一个领域。我们综合了之前的研究,说明了蜂鸟授粉的起源和动态,涉及以前由昆虫(主要是蜜蜂)、蝙蝠和传鸟授粉的不同被子植物支系。在某些情况下,蜂鸟的冠龄早于它们授粉的植物。在另一些情况下,蜂鸟在美洲建立之初,植物群就已过渡到蜂鸟授粉,两种多样性的积累在时间上是一致的,因此表明蜂鸟与蜂鸟之间存在着共同的多样性。确定蜂鸟授粉和蜂鸟不授粉的诱因仍然是一个重大挑战。蜂鸟对植物多样性的影响是复杂的,许多热带植物品系在获得吸引蜂鸟的花朵后,其多样性有所增加,而另一些植物品系的多样性则没有变化,甚至有所下降。这种参差不齐的证据表明,其他外在或内在因素,如当地气候和隔离,是推动适应蜂鸟授粉的植物多样化的重要共变因素。为了指导未来的研究,我们讨论了蜂鸟作为一个支系和单个物种(如性状、觅食行为、专业化程度)可能影响植物进化的机制和背景。最后,我们评论了互惠关系的宏观进化信号与共同进化的关系,强调了对互惠关系中植物一方的不平衡关注,并提倡在宏观进化研究中使用物种水平的互惠关系数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Macroevolution of the plant–hummingbird pollination system

Macroevolution of the plant–hummingbird pollination system

Plant–hummingbird interactions are considered a classic example of coevolution, a process in which mutually dependent species influence each other's evolution. Plants depend on hummingbirds for pollination, whereas hummingbirds rely on nectar for food. As a step towards understanding coevolution, this review focuses on the macroevolutionary consequences of plant–hummingbird interactions, a relatively underexplored area in the current literature. We synthesize prior studies, illustrating the origins and dynamics of hummingbird pollination across different angiosperm clades previously pollinated by insects (mostly bees), bats, and passerine birds. In some cases, the crown age of hummingbirds pre-dates the plants they pollinate. In other cases, plant groups transitioned to hummingbird pollination early in the establishment of this bird group in the Americas, with the build-up of both diversities coinciding temporally, and hence suggesting co-diversification. Determining what triggers shifts to and away from hummingbird pollination remains a major open challenge. The impact of hummingbirds on plant diversification is complex, with many tropical plant lineages experiencing increased diversification after acquiring flowers that attract hummingbirds, and others experiencing no change or even a decrease in diversification rates. This mixed evidence suggests that other extrinsic or intrinsic factors, such as local climate and isolation, are important covariables driving the diversification of plants adapted to hummingbird pollination. To guide future studies, we discuss the mechanisms and contexts under which hummingbirds, as a clade and as individual species (e.g. traits, foraging behaviour, degree of specialization), could influence plant evolution. We conclude by commenting on how macroevolutionary signals of the mutualism could relate to coevolution, highlighting the unbalanced focus on the plant side of the interaction, and advocating for the use of species-level interaction data in macroevolutionary studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Reviews
Biological Reviews 生物-生物学
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly. The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions. The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field. Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信