种族/民族和社会经济地位是预测精神病临床高危青少年接受家庭治疗后的结果的因素。

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Bernalyn Ruiz-Yu, Thanh P. Le, Marc J. Weintraub, Jamie Zinberg, Jean Addington, Mary P. O'Brien, Barbara C. Walsh, Michelle Friedman-Yakoobian, Andrea Auther,  Cornblatt, Isabel Domingues, Tyrone D. Cannon, David J. Miklowitz, Carrie E. Bearden
{"title":"种族/民族和社会经济地位是预测精神病临床高危青少年接受家庭治疗后的结果的因素。","authors":"Bernalyn Ruiz-Yu,&nbsp;Thanh P. Le,&nbsp;Marc J. Weintraub,&nbsp;Jamie Zinberg,&nbsp;Jean Addington,&nbsp;Mary P. O'Brien,&nbsp;Barbara C. Walsh,&nbsp;Michelle Friedman-Yakoobian,&nbsp;Andrea Auther,&nbsp; Cornblatt,&nbsp;Isabel Domingues,&nbsp;Tyrone D. Cannon,&nbsp;David J. Miklowitz,&nbsp;Carrie E. Bearden","doi":"10.1111/eip.13541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>There is limited research on the effects of sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors on treatment outcomes in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHRp). This study examined sociodemographic factors that may affect functional outcomes within this population. Specifically, we investigated the influence of race/ethnicity (dichotomized as non-Hispanic whites [NHW] vs. people of colour [POC]), socioeconomic status (SES; operationalized as parental years of education), and their interaction on change in psychosocial functioning and symptoms over 6 months in a randomized trial of family-focused therapy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>CHRp youth (<i>N</i> = 128) participated in a randomized trial of family therapy (18 sessions of family therapy vs. 3 sessions of family psychoeducation). Sixty-four participants who self-identified as POC and 64 self-identified NHW participants completed baseline and 6-month follow-up measures of positive and negative symptoms and psychosocial (global, role, and social) functioning. Multiple regression models were conducted to test the main effect of race/ethnicity on changes in positive and negative symptoms and functioning, and whether this effect was moderated by parental education.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There was a significant interaction between race/ethnicity and parental education, such that higher parental education was associated with greater improvement in global functioning in NHW participants, but there was no relationship between parental education and global functioning in POC. Additionally, higher parental education was associated with a decrease in negative symptoms in NHW participants but not in POC. There were no significant effects of race/ethnicity or parental education on positive symptoms, nor on social or role functioning.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Clinicians may consider tailoring psychosocial treatments according to the needs of diverse families who vary in sociodemographic factors such as educational attainment and race/ethnicity.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11385,"journal":{"name":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","volume":"18 12","pages":"981-990"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512687/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status as predictors of outcome following family therapy in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis\",\"authors\":\"Bernalyn Ruiz-Yu,&nbsp;Thanh P. Le,&nbsp;Marc J. Weintraub,&nbsp;Jamie Zinberg,&nbsp;Jean Addington,&nbsp;Mary P. O'Brien,&nbsp;Barbara C. Walsh,&nbsp;Michelle Friedman-Yakoobian,&nbsp;Andrea Auther,&nbsp; Cornblatt,&nbsp;Isabel Domingues,&nbsp;Tyrone D. Cannon,&nbsp;David J. Miklowitz,&nbsp;Carrie E. Bearden\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eip.13541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>There is limited research on the effects of sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors on treatment outcomes in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHRp). This study examined sociodemographic factors that may affect functional outcomes within this population. Specifically, we investigated the influence of race/ethnicity (dichotomized as non-Hispanic whites [NHW] vs. people of colour [POC]), socioeconomic status (SES; operationalized as parental years of education), and their interaction on change in psychosocial functioning and symptoms over 6 months in a randomized trial of family-focused therapy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>CHRp youth (<i>N</i> = 128) participated in a randomized trial of family therapy (18 sessions of family therapy vs. 3 sessions of family psychoeducation). Sixty-four participants who self-identified as POC and 64 self-identified NHW participants completed baseline and 6-month follow-up measures of positive and negative symptoms and psychosocial (global, role, and social) functioning. Multiple regression models were conducted to test the main effect of race/ethnicity on changes in positive and negative symptoms and functioning, and whether this effect was moderated by parental education.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>There was a significant interaction between race/ethnicity and parental education, such that higher parental education was associated with greater improvement in global functioning in NHW participants, but there was no relationship between parental education and global functioning in POC. Additionally, higher parental education was associated with a decrease in negative symptoms in NHW participants but not in POC. There were no significant effects of race/ethnicity or parental education on positive symptoms, nor on social or role functioning.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Clinicians may consider tailoring psychosocial treatments according to the needs of diverse families who vary in sociodemographic factors such as educational attainment and race/ethnicity.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Early Intervention in Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\"18 12\",\"pages\":\"981-990\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11512687/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Early Intervention in Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eip.13541\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Intervention in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eip.13541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:有关社会人口和社会经济因素对临床高危精神病(CHRp)青少年治疗效果影响的研究十分有限。本研究探讨了可能影响该人群功能性治疗效果的社会人口因素。具体来说,我们调查了种族/民族(二分法为非西班牙裔白人 [NHW] 与有色人种 [POC])、社会经济地位(SES;以父母受教育年限为操作标准)及其相互作用对以家庭为中心的随机疗法试验中 6 个月内社会心理功能和症状变化的影响:CHRp 青少年(128 人)参加了家庭治疗随机试验(18 次家庭治疗与 3 次家庭心理教育)。64 名自我认定为 POC 的参与者和 64 名自我认定为 NHW 的参与者完成了积极和消极症状以及心理社会(整体、角色和社会)功能的基线和 6 个月随访测量。我们建立了多元回归模型,以检验种族/民族对积极和消极症状及功能变化的主要影响,以及这种影响是否受父母教育的调节:结果:种族/民族与父母教育程度之间存在明显的交互作用,父母教育程度越高,非华裔参与者的整体功能改善越大,但父母教育程度与华裔儿童的整体功能没有关系。此外,父母受教育程度越高,NHW 参与者的负面症状越少,而 POC 参与者的负面症状则没有减少。种族/族裔或父母教育程度对阳性症状、社交或角色功能没有明显影响:临床医生可以考虑根据不同家庭的需求来调整社会心理治疗方法,因为这些家庭的社会人口因素(如教育程度和种族/民族)各不相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status as predictors of outcome following family therapy in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis

Race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status as predictors of outcome following family therapy in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis

Aim

There is limited research on the effects of sociodemographic and socioeconomic factors on treatment outcomes in youth at clinical high risk for psychosis (CHRp). This study examined sociodemographic factors that may affect functional outcomes within this population. Specifically, we investigated the influence of race/ethnicity (dichotomized as non-Hispanic whites [NHW] vs. people of colour [POC]), socioeconomic status (SES; operationalized as parental years of education), and their interaction on change in psychosocial functioning and symptoms over 6 months in a randomized trial of family-focused therapy.

Methods

CHRp youth (N = 128) participated in a randomized trial of family therapy (18 sessions of family therapy vs. 3 sessions of family psychoeducation). Sixty-four participants who self-identified as POC and 64 self-identified NHW participants completed baseline and 6-month follow-up measures of positive and negative symptoms and psychosocial (global, role, and social) functioning. Multiple regression models were conducted to test the main effect of race/ethnicity on changes in positive and negative symptoms and functioning, and whether this effect was moderated by parental education.

Results

There was a significant interaction between race/ethnicity and parental education, such that higher parental education was associated with greater improvement in global functioning in NHW participants, but there was no relationship between parental education and global functioning in POC. Additionally, higher parental education was associated with a decrease in negative symptoms in NHW participants but not in POC. There were no significant effects of race/ethnicity or parental education on positive symptoms, nor on social or role functioning.

Conclusions

Clinicians may consider tailoring psychosocial treatments according to the needs of diverse families who vary in sociodemographic factors such as educational attainment and race/ethnicity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Early Intervention in Psychiatry
Early Intervention in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
5.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Early Intervention in Psychiatry publishes original research articles and reviews dealing with the early recognition, diagnosis and treatment across the full range of mental and substance use disorders, as well as the underlying epidemiological, biological, psychological and social mechanisms that influence the onset and early course of these disorders. The journal provides comprehensive coverage of early intervention for the full range of psychiatric disorders and mental health problems, including schizophrenia and other psychoses, mood and anxiety disorders, substance use disorders, eating disorders and personality disorders. Papers in any of the following fields are considered: diagnostic issues, psychopathology, clinical epidemiology, biological mechanisms, treatments and other forms of intervention, clinical trials, health services and economic research and mental health policy. Special features are also published, including hypotheses, controversies and snapshots of innovative service models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信