美国 MetALD 患者的候选名单和肝移植:对 UNOS 国家登记处的分析。

IF 12.9 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-04-29 DOI:10.1097/HEP.0000000000000914
Pedro Ochoa-Allemant, Marina Serper, Roy X Wang, Helen Tang, Bachir Ghandour, Sarem Khan, Nadim Mahmud
{"title":"美国 MetALD 患者的候选名单和肝移植:对 UNOS 国家登记处的分析。","authors":"Pedro Ochoa-Allemant, Marina Serper, Roy X Wang, Helen Tang, Bachir Ghandour, Sarem Khan, Nadim Mahmud","doi":"10.1097/HEP.0000000000000914","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The new steatotic liver disease (SLD) nomenclature introduced metabolic and alcohol-associated liver disease (MetALD), describing the intersection of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and alcohol-associated liver disease. Waitlisting and liver transplantation for MetALD are not well defined. We aimed to develop and validate an algorithm for identifying SLD phenotypes and assessing trends in waitlisting and transplant outcomes.</p><p><strong>Approach and results: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry, supplemented with detailed single-center data. We developed 5 candidate algorithms for SLD classification and calculated their diagnostic performance. Trends in waitlist registrations and transplants were estimated, and competing risk analyses and Cox regression models were conducted to assess waitlist removal and posttransplant outcomes among SLD phenotypes. The best-performing algorithm demonstrated substantial agreement (weighted kappa, 0.62) for SLD phenotypes, with acceptable sensitivity (73%) for MetALD. Between 2002 and 2022, waitlist registrations and transplants for MetALD increased 2.9-fold and 3.3-fold, respectively. Since 2013, there has been a significant increase in the absolute number of waitlist registrations (122 per year; 95% CI, 111-133) and transplants (107 per year; 95% CI, 94-120) for MetALD. Patients with MetALD experienced higher waitlist removal (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17), all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.03-1.23), and graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.21) than those with alcohol-associated liver disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed and validated an algorithm for identifying SLD phenotypes in UNOS. MetALD is the third leading etiology among those waitlisted and underwent transplantation, exhibiting worse pretransplantation and posttransplantation outcomes compared to alcohol-associated liver disease. Identifying and addressing factors determining poor outcomes is crucial in this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":177,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology","volume":" ","pages":"532-545"},"PeriodicalIF":12.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Waitlisting and liver transplantation for MetALD in the United States: An analysis of the UNOS national registry.\",\"authors\":\"Pedro Ochoa-Allemant, Marina Serper, Roy X Wang, Helen Tang, Bachir Ghandour, Sarem Khan, Nadim Mahmud\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HEP.0000000000000914\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>The new steatotic liver disease (SLD) nomenclature introduced metabolic and alcohol-associated liver disease (MetALD), describing the intersection of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and alcohol-associated liver disease. Waitlisting and liver transplantation for MetALD are not well defined. We aimed to develop and validate an algorithm for identifying SLD phenotypes and assessing trends in waitlisting and transplant outcomes.</p><p><strong>Approach and results: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry, supplemented with detailed single-center data. We developed 5 candidate algorithms for SLD classification and calculated their diagnostic performance. Trends in waitlist registrations and transplants were estimated, and competing risk analyses and Cox regression models were conducted to assess waitlist removal and posttransplant outcomes among SLD phenotypes. The best-performing algorithm demonstrated substantial agreement (weighted kappa, 0.62) for SLD phenotypes, with acceptable sensitivity (73%) for MetALD. Between 2002 and 2022, waitlist registrations and transplants for MetALD increased 2.9-fold and 3.3-fold, respectively. Since 2013, there has been a significant increase in the absolute number of waitlist registrations (122 per year; 95% CI, 111-133) and transplants (107 per year; 95% CI, 94-120) for MetALD. Patients with MetALD experienced higher waitlist removal (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17), all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.03-1.23), and graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.21) than those with alcohol-associated liver disease.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We developed and validated an algorithm for identifying SLD phenotypes in UNOS. MetALD is the third leading etiology among those waitlisted and underwent transplantation, exhibiting worse pretransplantation and posttransplantation outcomes compared to alcohol-associated liver disease. Identifying and addressing factors determining poor outcomes is crucial in this patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":177,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"532-545\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HEP.0000000000000914\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HEP.0000000000000914","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:新的脂肪性肝病(SLD)命名法引入了代谢和酒精相关性肝病(MetALD),描述了代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝病(MASLD)和酒精相关性肝病(ALD)的交叉。代谢性肝病的候选名单和肝移植尚无明确定义。我们的目的是开发并验证一种用于识别 SLD 表型的算法,并评估候诊和移植结果的趋势:方法:我们利用器官共享联合网络的登记资料,辅以详细的单中心数据,开展了一项回顾性队列研究。我们为 SLD 分类开发了五种候选算法,并计算了它们的诊断性能。我们估算了候选名单登记和移植的趋势,并进行了竞争风险分析和 Cox 回归模型,以评估不同 SLD 表型的候选名单移除和移植后结果:结果:表现最好的算法对SLD表型显示出很大的一致性(加权卡帕,0.62),对MetALD的灵敏度(73%)可以接受。2002-2022年间,MetALD的候补登记人数和移植人数分别增加了2.9倍和3.3倍。自2013年以来,MetALD的候诊登记绝对数(每年122例;95% CI,111-133例)和移植绝对数(每年107例;95% CI,94-120例)均有显著增长。与ALD患者相比,MetALD患者的候选名单移除率(aSHR,1.10;95% CI,1.03-1.17)、全因死亡率(aHR,1.13;95%,1.03-1.23)和移植失败率(aHR,1.12;95% CI,1.03-1.21)均较高:我们开发并验证了一种在 UNOS 中识别 SLD 表型的算法。MetALD是等待移植者中的第三大病因,与ALD相比,其移植前后的预后更差。在这一患者群体中,识别和解决决定不良预后的因素至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Waitlisting and liver transplantation for MetALD in the United States: An analysis of the UNOS national registry.

Background and aims: The new steatotic liver disease (SLD) nomenclature introduced metabolic and alcohol-associated liver disease (MetALD), describing the intersection of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and alcohol-associated liver disease. Waitlisting and liver transplantation for MetALD are not well defined. We aimed to develop and validate an algorithm for identifying SLD phenotypes and assessing trends in waitlisting and transplant outcomes.

Approach and results: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the United Network for Organ Sharing registry, supplemented with detailed single-center data. We developed 5 candidate algorithms for SLD classification and calculated their diagnostic performance. Trends in waitlist registrations and transplants were estimated, and competing risk analyses and Cox regression models were conducted to assess waitlist removal and posttransplant outcomes among SLD phenotypes. The best-performing algorithm demonstrated substantial agreement (weighted kappa, 0.62) for SLD phenotypes, with acceptable sensitivity (73%) for MetALD. Between 2002 and 2022, waitlist registrations and transplants for MetALD increased 2.9-fold and 3.3-fold, respectively. Since 2013, there has been a significant increase in the absolute number of waitlist registrations (122 per year; 95% CI, 111-133) and transplants (107 per year; 95% CI, 94-120) for MetALD. Patients with MetALD experienced higher waitlist removal (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.03-1.17), all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.03-1.23), and graft failure (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.03-1.21) than those with alcohol-associated liver disease.

Conclusions: We developed and validated an algorithm for identifying SLD phenotypes in UNOS. MetALD is the third leading etiology among those waitlisted and underwent transplantation, exhibiting worse pretransplantation and posttransplantation outcomes compared to alcohol-associated liver disease. Identifying and addressing factors determining poor outcomes is crucial in this patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hepatology
Hepatology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
27.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
609
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: HEPATOLOGY is recognized as the leading publication in the field of liver disease. It features original, peer-reviewed articles covering various aspects of liver structure, function, and disease. The journal's distinguished Editorial Board carefully selects the best articles each month, focusing on topics including immunology, chronic hepatitis, viral hepatitis, cirrhosis, genetic and metabolic liver diseases, liver cancer, and drug metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信