Zaheera Saadia, Khalid Nasrallah, Aseel Ibrahim Alzuwaydi, Hossam Omer Hamid
{"title":"旷课对学生不同考试成绩的影响--在线教学与离线教学的比较。","authors":"Zaheera Saadia, Khalid Nasrallah, Aseel Ibrahim Alzuwaydi, Hossam Omer Hamid","doi":"10.5455/aim.2024.32.47-53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The In online learning, more responsibility is shifted towards students in learning according to their needs. However there is a need to assess which component of teaching can be shifted online for future hybrid teachings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the students' performance in difference components of the exams and compare them in online vs offline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It was a quantitative study comparing onsite and online groups academic performance in individual components of assessment for a duration of 6 months. Estimates were reported per standard deviation (SD) increase or decrease. Taking absenteeism rate as a predictor, models with group and gender on their own was fitted in univariable models, before including all three predictors (absenteeism rate, group and gender) in the final model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students who studied online, had a 0.49SD higher grade than their counterparts who attended physically (p < 0.001), each SD increase in the absenteeism rate was associated with a 0.26SD lower overall score, and this was significant, p < 0.001. While comparing both groups in MCQ part students who studied online, had a 0.6SD higher grade than their counterparts (p < 0.001), also in continuous assessment students who studied online, had a 0.49 SD higher grade than their counterparts who attended physically (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Positive effect of the online teaching was clear in the (MCQs) and the final result, while no significant gender variation detected in this study.</p>","PeriodicalId":7074,"journal":{"name":"Acta Informatica Medica","volume":"32 1","pages":"47-53"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10997176/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Absenteeism on Student's Performance in Different Components of Examinations - A Comparison of Online Verses Offline Teaching.\",\"authors\":\"Zaheera Saadia, Khalid Nasrallah, Aseel Ibrahim Alzuwaydi, Hossam Omer Hamid\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/aim.2024.32.47-53\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The In online learning, more responsibility is shifted towards students in learning according to their needs. However there is a need to assess which component of teaching can be shifted online for future hybrid teachings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to compare the students' performance in difference components of the exams and compare them in online vs offline.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It was a quantitative study comparing onsite and online groups academic performance in individual components of assessment for a duration of 6 months. Estimates were reported per standard deviation (SD) increase or decrease. Taking absenteeism rate as a predictor, models with group and gender on their own was fitted in univariable models, before including all three predictors (absenteeism rate, group and gender) in the final model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students who studied online, had a 0.49SD higher grade than their counterparts who attended physically (p < 0.001), each SD increase in the absenteeism rate was associated with a 0.26SD lower overall score, and this was significant, p < 0.001. While comparing both groups in MCQ part students who studied online, had a 0.6SD higher grade than their counterparts (p < 0.001), also in continuous assessment students who studied online, had a 0.49 SD higher grade than their counterparts who attended physically (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Positive effect of the online teaching was clear in the (MCQs) and the final result, while no significant gender variation detected in this study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7074,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Informatica Medica\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"47-53\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10997176/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Informatica Medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2024.32.47-53\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Informatica Medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2024.32.47-53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of Absenteeism on Student's Performance in Different Components of Examinations - A Comparison of Online Verses Offline Teaching.
Background: The In online learning, more responsibility is shifted towards students in learning according to their needs. However there is a need to assess which component of teaching can be shifted online for future hybrid teachings.
Objective: This study aims to compare the students' performance in difference components of the exams and compare them in online vs offline.
Methods: It was a quantitative study comparing onsite and online groups academic performance in individual components of assessment for a duration of 6 months. Estimates were reported per standard deviation (SD) increase or decrease. Taking absenteeism rate as a predictor, models with group and gender on their own was fitted in univariable models, before including all three predictors (absenteeism rate, group and gender) in the final model.
Results: Students who studied online, had a 0.49SD higher grade than their counterparts who attended physically (p < 0.001), each SD increase in the absenteeism rate was associated with a 0.26SD lower overall score, and this was significant, p < 0.001. While comparing both groups in MCQ part students who studied online, had a 0.6SD higher grade than their counterparts (p < 0.001), also in continuous assessment students who studied online, had a 0.49 SD higher grade than their counterparts who attended physically (p < 0.001).
Conclusion: Positive effect of the online teaching was clear in the (MCQs) and the final result, while no significant gender variation detected in this study.