评估非侵入性 dsRNA 递送方法,以开发白纹伊蚊的 RNA 干扰能力

IF 4.3 1区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Maxime Girard, Vincent Berthaud, Edwige Martin, Laurent Vallon, Rita Rebollo, Agnès Vallier, Aurélien Vigneron, Anne-Emmanuelle Hay, Claire Valiente Moro, Guillaume Minard
{"title":"评估非侵入性 dsRNA 递送方法,以开发白纹伊蚊的 RNA 干扰能力","authors":"Maxime Girard, Vincent Berthaud, Edwige Martin, Laurent Vallon, Rita Rebollo, Agnès Vallier, Aurélien Vigneron, Anne-Emmanuelle Hay, Claire Valiente Moro, Guillaume Minard","doi":"10.1007/s10340-024-01779-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Asian tiger mosquito <i>Aedes albopictus</i> is one of the most invasive species and an efficient vector of several pathogens. RNA interference (RNAi) has been proposed as an alternative method to control mosquito populations by silencing the expression of genes that are essential for their survival. However, the optimal delivery method for dsRNAs to enhance an optimal RNAi remains elusive and comparative studies are lacking. We have, therefore, compared the efficiency of three non-invasive delivery methods to mosquito larvae: soaking, rehydration and nanoparticle ingestion. Each method was tested separately on four genes predicted to code non-essential proteins (<i>i.e., collagenase</i>-like, <i>kynurenine 3-monooxygenase</i>-like, <i>yellow</i>-like and <i>venom serine protease</i>-like) in order to be able to compare the importance of gene knock-down. All tested methods successfully downregulated mosquito gene expression. However, silencing efficiency strongly varies among methods and genes<b>.</b> Silencing (95.1%) was higher for <i>Kynurenine 3-monooxygenase</i>-like with rehydration and nanoparticle ingestion (61.1%). For the <i>Venom serine protease</i>-like, the most efficient silencing was observed with soaking (74.5%) and rehydration (34%). In contrast, the selected methods are inefficient to silence the other genes. Our findings also indicate that gene copy numbers, transcript sizes and GC content correlate with the silencing efficiency. From our results, rehydration was the most specific and efficient methods to specifically knock-down gene expression in <i>Ae. albopictus</i> larvae. Nevertheless, considering the observed variability of efficiency is gene-dependent, our results also point at the necessity to test and optimize diverse dsRNA delivery approaches to achieve a maximal RNAi efficiency.</p>","PeriodicalId":16736,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pest Science","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of non-invasive dsRNA delivery methods for the development of RNA interference in the Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus\",\"authors\":\"Maxime Girard, Vincent Berthaud, Edwige Martin, Laurent Vallon, Rita Rebollo, Agnès Vallier, Aurélien Vigneron, Anne-Emmanuelle Hay, Claire Valiente Moro, Guillaume Minard\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10340-024-01779-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Asian tiger mosquito <i>Aedes albopictus</i> is one of the most invasive species and an efficient vector of several pathogens. RNA interference (RNAi) has been proposed as an alternative method to control mosquito populations by silencing the expression of genes that are essential for their survival. However, the optimal delivery method for dsRNAs to enhance an optimal RNAi remains elusive and comparative studies are lacking. We have, therefore, compared the efficiency of three non-invasive delivery methods to mosquito larvae: soaking, rehydration and nanoparticle ingestion. Each method was tested separately on four genes predicted to code non-essential proteins (<i>i.e., collagenase</i>-like, <i>kynurenine 3-monooxygenase</i>-like, <i>yellow</i>-like and <i>venom serine protease</i>-like) in order to be able to compare the importance of gene knock-down. All tested methods successfully downregulated mosquito gene expression. However, silencing efficiency strongly varies among methods and genes<b>.</b> Silencing (95.1%) was higher for <i>Kynurenine 3-monooxygenase</i>-like with rehydration and nanoparticle ingestion (61.1%). For the <i>Venom serine protease</i>-like, the most efficient silencing was observed with soaking (74.5%) and rehydration (34%). In contrast, the selected methods are inefficient to silence the other genes. Our findings also indicate that gene copy numbers, transcript sizes and GC content correlate with the silencing efficiency. From our results, rehydration was the most specific and efficient methods to specifically knock-down gene expression in <i>Ae. albopictus</i> larvae. Nevertheless, considering the observed variability of efficiency is gene-dependent, our results also point at the necessity to test and optimize diverse dsRNA delivery approaches to achieve a maximal RNAi efficiency.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pest Science\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pest Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-024-01779-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pest Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10340-024-01779-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

亚洲白纹伊蚊是最具入侵性的物种之一,也是多种病原体的有效传播媒介。RNA 干扰(RNAi)被认为是通过沉默蚊子生存所必需的基因表达来控制蚊子数量的另一种方法。然而,dsRNA 的最佳递送方法仍然难以确定,也缺乏比较研究。因此,我们比较了三种蚊子幼虫非侵入性递送方法的效率:浸泡、补液和纳米颗粒摄取。为了比较基因敲除的重要性,每种方法都分别对四种预测编码非必需蛋白的基因(即胶原酶样、犬尿氨酸 3-单氧化酶样、黄色样和毒液丝氨酸蛋白酶样)进行了测试。所有测试方法都成功地降低了蚊子基因的表达。然而,不同方法和基因的沉默效率差异很大。犬尿氨酸 3-单氧合酶样基因的沉默率(95.1%)高于补液法和纳米粒子摄取法(61.1%)。对于毒液丝氨酸蛋白酶样,浸泡(74.5%)和复水(34%)的沉默效率最高。相比之下,所选方法对其他基因的沉默效率较低。我们的研究结果还表明,基因拷贝数、转录本大小和 GC 含量与沉默效率有关。从我们的研究结果来看,补液法是特异性敲低白纹伊蚊幼虫基因表达的最特异、最有效的方法。尽管如此,考虑到观察到的效率变化与基因有关,我们的结果还表明有必要测试和优化各种 dsRNA 递送方法,以实现最高的 RNAi 效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of non-invasive dsRNA delivery methods for the development of RNA interference in the Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus

Evaluation of non-invasive dsRNA delivery methods for the development of RNA interference in the Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus

The Asian tiger mosquito Aedes albopictus is one of the most invasive species and an efficient vector of several pathogens. RNA interference (RNAi) has been proposed as an alternative method to control mosquito populations by silencing the expression of genes that are essential for their survival. However, the optimal delivery method for dsRNAs to enhance an optimal RNAi remains elusive and comparative studies are lacking. We have, therefore, compared the efficiency of three non-invasive delivery methods to mosquito larvae: soaking, rehydration and nanoparticle ingestion. Each method was tested separately on four genes predicted to code non-essential proteins (i.e., collagenase-like, kynurenine 3-monooxygenase-like, yellow-like and venom serine protease-like) in order to be able to compare the importance of gene knock-down. All tested methods successfully downregulated mosquito gene expression. However, silencing efficiency strongly varies among methods and genes. Silencing (95.1%) was higher for Kynurenine 3-monooxygenase-like with rehydration and nanoparticle ingestion (61.1%). For the Venom serine protease-like, the most efficient silencing was observed with soaking (74.5%) and rehydration (34%). In contrast, the selected methods are inefficient to silence the other genes. Our findings also indicate that gene copy numbers, transcript sizes and GC content correlate with the silencing efficiency. From our results, rehydration was the most specific and efficient methods to specifically knock-down gene expression in Ae. albopictus larvae. Nevertheless, considering the observed variability of efficiency is gene-dependent, our results also point at the necessity to test and optimize diverse dsRNA delivery approaches to achieve a maximal RNAi efficiency.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pest Science
Journal of Pest Science 生物-昆虫学
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
114
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Pest Science publishes high-quality papers on all aspects of pest science in agriculture, horticulture (including viticulture), forestry, urban pests, and stored products research, including health and safety issues. Journal of Pest Science reports on advances in control of pests and animal vectors of diseases, the biology, ethology and ecology of pests and their antagonists, and the use of other beneficial organisms in pest control. The journal covers all noxious or damaging groups of animals, including arthropods, nematodes, molluscs, and vertebrates. Journal of Pest Science devotes special attention to emerging and innovative pest control strategies, including the side effects of such approaches on non-target organisms, for example natural enemies and pollinators, and the implementation of these strategies in integrated pest management. Journal of Pest Science also publishes papers on the management of agro- and forest ecosystems where this is relevant to pest control. Papers on important methodological developments relevant for pest control will be considered as well.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信