Emily G. Chin, PhD, RNC, CNE, Ginger Schroers, PhD, RNC, CNE, Laura Gonzalez, PhD, Lise Hauser, DNP, RN, Olga Lazala, PhD, APRN, Yeyin Yi, DNP, APRN, AGACNP-BC
{"title":"考后包装：批判性反思的工具","authors":"Emily G. Chin, PhD, RNC, CNE, Ginger Schroers, PhD, RNC, CNE, Laura Gonzalez, PhD, Lise Hauser, DNP, RN, Olga Lazala, PhD, APRN, Yeyin Yi, DNP, APRN, AGACNP-BC","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20240417-01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<section><h3>Background:</h3><p>Post-exam review sessions that reveal a completed exam to students can be time-consuming and ineffective. Additionally, the review may jeopardize exam integrity by exposing the individual items.</p></section><section><h3>Method:</h3><p>To promote critical reflection, an exam wrapper, without the return of a completed exam, was implemented. Students were encouraged to take deeper ownership of learning and be active in the process of exam review.</p></section><section><h3>Results:</h3><p>Most students strongly agreed or agreed that they adjusted their study strategies based on their self-reflection (68.5%) or on the instructor feedback (66.7%) provided through the wrapper. All faculty stated the process of using wrappers was much more or more valuable and efficient, compared to prior post-exam feedback methods.</p></section><section><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>Using an exam wrapper as a stand-alone, post-exam debrief, students assume a more proactive role by reflecting on individual exam preparation and learning strategies without the return of a completed exam. <strong>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2024;63(X):XXX–XXX.]</strong></p></section>","PeriodicalId":54781,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Education","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Post-Exam Wrappers: A Tool for Critical Reflection\",\"authors\":\"Emily G. Chin, PhD, RNC, CNE, Ginger Schroers, PhD, RNC, CNE, Laura Gonzalez, PhD, Lise Hauser, DNP, RN, Olga Lazala, PhD, APRN, Yeyin Yi, DNP, APRN, AGACNP-BC\",\"doi\":\"10.3928/01484834-20240417-01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<section><h3>Background:</h3><p>Post-exam review sessions that reveal a completed exam to students can be time-consuming and ineffective. Additionally, the review may jeopardize exam integrity by exposing the individual items.</p></section><section><h3>Method:</h3><p>To promote critical reflection, an exam wrapper, without the return of a completed exam, was implemented. Students were encouraged to take deeper ownership of learning and be active in the process of exam review.</p></section><section><h3>Results:</h3><p>Most students strongly agreed or agreed that they adjusted their study strategies based on their self-reflection (68.5%) or on the instructor feedback (66.7%) provided through the wrapper. All faculty stated the process of using wrappers was much more or more valuable and efficient, compared to prior post-exam feedback methods.</p></section><section><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>Using an exam wrapper as a stand-alone, post-exam debrief, students assume a more proactive role by reflecting on individual exam preparation and learning strategies without the return of a completed exam. <strong>[<i>J Nurs Educ</i>. 2024;63(X):XXX–XXX.]</strong></p></section>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54781,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Nursing Education\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Nursing Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20240417-01\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20240417-01","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Post-Exam Wrappers: A Tool for Critical Reflection
Background:
Post-exam review sessions that reveal a completed exam to students can be time-consuming and ineffective. Additionally, the review may jeopardize exam integrity by exposing the individual items.
Method:
To promote critical reflection, an exam wrapper, without the return of a completed exam, was implemented. Students were encouraged to take deeper ownership of learning and be active in the process of exam review.
Results:
Most students strongly agreed or agreed that they adjusted their study strategies based on their self-reflection (68.5%) or on the instructor feedback (66.7%) provided through the wrapper. All faculty stated the process of using wrappers was much more or more valuable and efficient, compared to prior post-exam feedback methods.
Conclusion:
Using an exam wrapper as a stand-alone, post-exam debrief, students assume a more proactive role by reflecting on individual exam preparation and learning strategies without the return of a completed exam. [J Nurs Educ. 2024;63(X):XXX–XXX.]
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Nursing Education is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal publishing original articles and new ideas for nurse educators in various types and levels of nursing programs for over 50 years. The Journal enhances the teaching-learning process, promotes curriculum development, and stimulates creative innovation and research in nursing education.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
