C. Prior, H. Swales, M. Sharman, N. Reed, N. Bommer, A. Kent, B. Glanemann, K. Clarke, A. Kortum, D. Kelly, C. Lea, E. Roberts, L. Rutherford, A. Tamborini, K. Murphy, D. J. Batchelor, S. Calleja, R. Burrow, P. Jamieson, M. Best, S. Borgonovi, I. Calvo-saiz, I. Elgueta, C. Piazza, C. Gil Morales, A. Hrovat, M. Keane, J. Kennils, E. Lopez, S. Spence, E. Izaguirre, M. Hernandez-Perello, N. Lau, A. Paul, A. Ridyard, C. Shales, E. Shelton, A. Farges, G. Specchia, L. Espada, S. J. Fowlie, S. Tappin, N. Van den Steen, T. H. Sparks, F. Allerton
{"title":"英国犬鼻窦曲霉菌病的诊断结果:475 例病例(2011-2021 年)","authors":"C. Prior, H. Swales, M. Sharman, N. Reed, N. Bommer, A. Kent, B. Glanemann, K. Clarke, A. Kortum, D. Kelly, C. Lea, E. Roberts, L. Rutherford, A. Tamborini, K. Murphy, D. J. Batchelor, S. Calleja, R. Burrow, P. Jamieson, M. Best, S. Borgonovi, I. Calvo-saiz, I. Elgueta, C. Piazza, C. Gil Morales, A. Hrovat, M. Keane, J. Kennils, E. Lopez, S. Spence, E. Izaguirre, M. Hernandez-Perello, N. Lau, A. Paul, A. Ridyard, C. Shales, E. Shelton, A. Farges, G. Specchia, L. Espada, S. J. Fowlie, S. Tappin, N. Van den Steen, T. H. Sparks, F. Allerton","doi":"10.1111/jsap.13736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>To describe the diagnostic tests used and their comparative performance in dogs diagnosed with sinonasal aspergillosis in the United Kingdom. A secondary objective was to describe the signalment, clinical findings and common clinicopathologic abnormalities in sinonasal aspergillosis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A multi-centre retrospective survey was performed involving 23 referral centres in the United Kingdom to identify dogs diagnosed with sinonasal aspergillosis from January 2011 to December 2021. Dogs were included if fungal plaques were seen during rhinoscopy or if ancillary testing (<i>via</i> histopathology, culture, cytology, serology or PCR) was positive and other differential diagnoses were excluded.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 662 cases were entered into the database across the 23 referral centres. Four hundred and seventy-five cases met the study inclusion criteria. Of these, 419 dogs had fungal plaques and compatible clinical signs. Fungal plaques were not seen in 56 dogs with turbinate destruction that had compatible clinical signs and a positive ancillary test result. Ancillary diagnostics were performed in 312 of 419 (74%) dogs with observed fungal plaques permitting calculation of sensitivity of cytology as 67%, fungal culture 59%, histopathology 47% and PCR 71%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Clinical Significance</h3>\n \n <p>The sensitivities of ancillary diagnostics in this study were lower than previously reported challenging the clinical utility of such tests in sinonasal aspergillosis. Treatment and management decisions should be based on a combination of diagnostics including imaging findings, visual inspection, and ancillary testing, rather than ancillary tests alone.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jsap.13736","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic findings in sinonasal aspergillosis in dogs in the United Kingdom: 475 cases (2011–2021)\",\"authors\":\"C. Prior, H. Swales, M. Sharman, N. Reed, N. Bommer, A. Kent, B. Glanemann, K. Clarke, A. Kortum, D. Kelly, C. Lea, E. Roberts, L. Rutherford, A. Tamborini, K. Murphy, D. J. Batchelor, S. Calleja, R. Burrow, P. Jamieson, M. Best, S. Borgonovi, I. Calvo-saiz, I. Elgueta, C. Piazza, C. Gil Morales, A. Hrovat, M. Keane, J. Kennils, E. Lopez, S. Spence, E. Izaguirre, M. Hernandez-Perello, N. Lau, A. Paul, A. Ridyard, C. Shales, E. Shelton, A. Farges, G. Specchia, L. Espada, S. J. Fowlie, S. Tappin, N. Van den Steen, T. H. Sparks, F. Allerton\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jsap.13736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>To describe the diagnostic tests used and their comparative performance in dogs diagnosed with sinonasal aspergillosis in the United Kingdom. A secondary objective was to describe the signalment, clinical findings and common clinicopathologic abnormalities in sinonasal aspergillosis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>A multi-centre retrospective survey was performed involving 23 referral centres in the United Kingdom to identify dogs diagnosed with sinonasal aspergillosis from January 2011 to December 2021. Dogs were included if fungal plaques were seen during rhinoscopy or if ancillary testing (<i>via</i> histopathology, culture, cytology, serology or PCR) was positive and other differential diagnoses were excluded.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>A total of 662 cases were entered into the database across the 23 referral centres. Four hundred and seventy-five cases met the study inclusion criteria. Of these, 419 dogs had fungal plaques and compatible clinical signs. Fungal plaques were not seen in 56 dogs with turbinate destruction that had compatible clinical signs and a positive ancillary test result. Ancillary diagnostics were performed in 312 of 419 (74%) dogs with observed fungal plaques permitting calculation of sensitivity of cytology as 67%, fungal culture 59%, histopathology 47% and PCR 71%.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Clinical Significance</h3>\\n \\n <p>The sensitivities of ancillary diagnostics in this study were lower than previously reported challenging the clinical utility of such tests in sinonasal aspergillosis. Treatment and management decisions should be based on a combination of diagnostics including imaging findings, visual inspection, and ancillary testing, rather than ancillary tests alone.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17062,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Small Animal Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jsap.13736\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Small Animal Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jsap.13736\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Small Animal Practice","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jsap.13736","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic findings in sinonasal aspergillosis in dogs in the United Kingdom: 475 cases (2011–2021)
Objectives
To describe the diagnostic tests used and their comparative performance in dogs diagnosed with sinonasal aspergillosis in the United Kingdom. A secondary objective was to describe the signalment, clinical findings and common clinicopathologic abnormalities in sinonasal aspergillosis.
Materials and Methods
A multi-centre retrospective survey was performed involving 23 referral centres in the United Kingdom to identify dogs diagnosed with sinonasal aspergillosis from January 2011 to December 2021. Dogs were included if fungal plaques were seen during rhinoscopy or if ancillary testing (via histopathology, culture, cytology, serology or PCR) was positive and other differential diagnoses were excluded.
Results
A total of 662 cases were entered into the database across the 23 referral centres. Four hundred and seventy-five cases met the study inclusion criteria. Of these, 419 dogs had fungal plaques and compatible clinical signs. Fungal plaques were not seen in 56 dogs with turbinate destruction that had compatible clinical signs and a positive ancillary test result. Ancillary diagnostics were performed in 312 of 419 (74%) dogs with observed fungal plaques permitting calculation of sensitivity of cytology as 67%, fungal culture 59%, histopathology 47% and PCR 71%.
Clinical Significance
The sensitivities of ancillary diagnostics in this study were lower than previously reported challenging the clinical utility of such tests in sinonasal aspergillosis. Treatment and management decisions should be based on a combination of diagnostics including imaging findings, visual inspection, and ancillary testing, rather than ancillary tests alone.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Small Animal Practice (JSAP) is a monthly peer-reviewed publication integrating clinical research papers and case reports from international sources, covering all aspects of medicine and surgery relating to dogs, cats and other small animals. These papers facilitate the dissemination and implementation of new ideas and techniques relating to clinical veterinary practice, with the ultimate aim of promoting best practice. JSAP publishes high quality original articles, as well as other scientific and educational information. New developments are placed in perspective, encompassing new concepts and peer commentary. The target audience is veterinarians primarily engaged in the practise of small animal medicine and surgery.
In addition to original articles, JSAP will publish invited editorials (relating to a manuscript in the same issue or a topic of current interest), review articles, which provide in-depth discussion of important clinical issues, and other scientific and educational information from around the world.
The final decision on publication of a manuscript rests with the Editorial Board and ultimately with the Editor. All papers, regardless of type, represent the opinion of the authors and not necessarily that of the Editor, the Association or the Publisher.
The Journal of Small Animal Practice is published on behalf of the British Small Animal Veterinary Association and is also the official scientific journal of the World Small Animal Veterinary Association