温血马、纯血马和西部种马血液学变量的比较

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES
E. A. Schaefer, J. Edman, K. G. Magdesian
{"title":"温血马、纯血马和西部种马血液学变量的比较","authors":"E. A. Schaefer,&nbsp;J. Edman,&nbsp;K. G. Magdesian","doi":"10.1111/vcp.13343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Hematology is a diagnostic tool used to evaluate the health status of horses. However, breed differences are often not considered.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>The objective was to compare complete blood count variables among Warmbloods, Thoroughbreds, and stock horses (SH).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Ninety-six healthy horses were grouped by breed (Warmbloods, Thoroughbreds, and SH). Samples were collected through venipuncture for complete blood count analysis. One-way ANOVA with Tukey's tests or Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn's post hoc tests were used to compare hematologic variables among groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Warmbloods had a significantly lower total white blood cell (WBC) count (6.08 ± 1.11 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L) and lymphocyte count (1.76 ± 0.41 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L) than Thoroughbreds (7.28 ± 1.45; 2.28 ± 5.16 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L, respectively; <i>P</i> &lt; .001) and SH (7.21 ± 1.18 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L, <i>P</i> &lt; .01; 2.10 ± 5.17 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L; <i>P</i> &lt; .05). Warmbloods had a significantly lower red blood cell count (7.7 ± 0.8 × 10<sup>12</sup>/L) and higher mean corpuscular volume (MCV, 49.4 ± 2.2 fL) than Thoroughbreds (8.42 ± 1.2 × 10<sup>12</sup>/L, <i>P</i> &lt; .01; 47.3 ± 3.0 fL). Warmbloods had lower MCVs than SH (49.4 ± 2.2 vs 51.2 ± 2.6 fL). The mean cell hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) was higher in Warmbloods (35.0, 33.8–36.2 g/dL) and Thoroughbreds (34.9, 33.4–35.7 g/dL) than in SH breeds (34.0, 33.4–35.4 g/dL; <i>P</i> &lt; .001, both). Total protein concentrations were significantly lower in Thoroughbreds (67, 59–80 g/L) compared with SH (71, 64–83 g/dL) (<i>P</i> &lt; .05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Warmbloods had decreased WBC and lymphocyte counts compared with Thoroughbreds and SH, and Thoroughbreds had increased red blood cell counts. Thoroughbreds had lower total protein concentrations than SH. Clinicians should consider breed differences when interpreting hematologic values.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":23593,"journal":{"name":"Veterinary clinical pathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/vcp.13343","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of hematologic variables among Warmbloods, Thoroughbreds, and Western stock horse breeds\",\"authors\":\"E. A. Schaefer,&nbsp;J. Edman,&nbsp;K. G. Magdesian\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/vcp.13343\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Hematology is a diagnostic tool used to evaluate the health status of horses. However, breed differences are often not considered.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>The objective was to compare complete blood count variables among Warmbloods, Thoroughbreds, and stock horses (SH).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ninety-six healthy horses were grouped by breed (Warmbloods, Thoroughbreds, and SH). Samples were collected through venipuncture for complete blood count analysis. One-way ANOVA with Tukey's tests or Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn's post hoc tests were used to compare hematologic variables among groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Warmbloods had a significantly lower total white blood cell (WBC) count (6.08 ± 1.11 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L) and lymphocyte count (1.76 ± 0.41 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L) than Thoroughbreds (7.28 ± 1.45; 2.28 ± 5.16 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L, respectively; <i>P</i> &lt; .001) and SH (7.21 ± 1.18 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L, <i>P</i> &lt; .01; 2.10 ± 5.17 × 10<sup>9</sup>/L; <i>P</i> &lt; .05). Warmbloods had a significantly lower red blood cell count (7.7 ± 0.8 × 10<sup>12</sup>/L) and higher mean corpuscular volume (MCV, 49.4 ± 2.2 fL) than Thoroughbreds (8.42 ± 1.2 × 10<sup>12</sup>/L, <i>P</i> &lt; .01; 47.3 ± 3.0 fL). Warmbloods had lower MCVs than SH (49.4 ± 2.2 vs 51.2 ± 2.6 fL). The mean cell hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) was higher in Warmbloods (35.0, 33.8–36.2 g/dL) and Thoroughbreds (34.9, 33.4–35.7 g/dL) than in SH breeds (34.0, 33.4–35.4 g/dL; <i>P</i> &lt; .001, both). Total protein concentrations were significantly lower in Thoroughbreds (67, 59–80 g/L) compared with SH (71, 64–83 g/dL) (<i>P</i> &lt; .05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Warmbloods had decreased WBC and lymphocyte counts compared with Thoroughbreds and SH, and Thoroughbreds had increased red blood cell counts. Thoroughbreds had lower total protein concentrations than SH. Clinicians should consider breed differences when interpreting hematologic values.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Veterinary clinical pathology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/vcp.13343\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Veterinary clinical pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vcp.13343\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Veterinary clinical pathology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vcp.13343","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景血液学是一种用于评估马匹健康状况的诊断工具。目的 比较温血马、纯血马和种马(SH)的全血细胞计数变量。方法 将 96 匹健康马按品种分组(温血马、纯血马和种马)。通过静脉穿刺采集样本进行全血细胞计数分析。结果温血马的白细胞总数(WBC)明显低于纯血马(6.08 ± 1.11 × 109/L)和淋巴细胞计数(1.76 ± 0.41 × 109/L)明显低于纯血马(分别为 7.28 ± 1.45;2.28 ± 5.16 × 109/L;P <;.001)和 SH(7.21 ± 1.18 × 109/L,P <;.01;2.10 ± 5.17 × 109/L;P <;.05)。与纯血马(8.42 ± 1.2 × 1012/L,P < .01;47.3 ± 3.0 fL)相比,温血马的红细胞计数(7.7 ± 0.8 × 1012/L)明显较低,平均血球容积(MCV,49.4 ± 2.2 fL)较高。温血马的 MCV 值低于纯血马(49.4 ± 2.2 vs 51.2 ± 2.6 fL)。温血马(35.0, 33.8-36.2 g/dL)和纯血马(34.9, 33.4-35.7 g/dL)的平均细胞血红蛋白浓度(MCHC)高于SH品种(34.0, 33.4-35.4 g/dL;P < .001,均为)。纯血马的总蛋白浓度(67,59-80 g/L)明显低于 SH 马(71,64-83 g/dL)(P <.05)。结论与纯血马和 SH 马相比,温血马的白细胞和淋巴细胞数量减少,而纯血马的红细胞数量增加。纯血马的总蛋白质浓度低于 SH。临床医生在解释血液学数值时应考虑品种差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of hematologic variables among Warmbloods, Thoroughbreds, and Western stock horse breeds

Comparison of hematologic variables among Warmbloods, Thoroughbreds, and Western stock horse breeds

Background

Hematology is a diagnostic tool used to evaluate the health status of horses. However, breed differences are often not considered.

Objectives

The objective was to compare complete blood count variables among Warmbloods, Thoroughbreds, and stock horses (SH).

Methods

Ninety-six healthy horses were grouped by breed (Warmbloods, Thoroughbreds, and SH). Samples were collected through venipuncture for complete blood count analysis. One-way ANOVA with Tukey's tests or Kruskal–Wallis with Dunn's post hoc tests were used to compare hematologic variables among groups.

Results

Warmbloods had a significantly lower total white blood cell (WBC) count (6.08 ± 1.11 × 109/L) and lymphocyte count (1.76 ± 0.41 × 109/L) than Thoroughbreds (7.28 ± 1.45; 2.28 ± 5.16 × 109/L, respectively; P < .001) and SH (7.21 ± 1.18 × 109/L, P < .01; 2.10 ± 5.17 × 109/L; P < .05). Warmbloods had a significantly lower red blood cell count (7.7 ± 0.8 × 1012/L) and higher mean corpuscular volume (MCV, 49.4 ± 2.2 fL) than Thoroughbreds (8.42 ± 1.2 × 1012/L, P < .01; 47.3 ± 3.0 fL). Warmbloods had lower MCVs than SH (49.4 ± 2.2 vs 51.2 ± 2.6 fL). The mean cell hemoglobin concentration (MCHC) was higher in Warmbloods (35.0, 33.8–36.2 g/dL) and Thoroughbreds (34.9, 33.4–35.7 g/dL) than in SH breeds (34.0, 33.4–35.4 g/dL; P < .001, both). Total protein concentrations were significantly lower in Thoroughbreds (67, 59–80 g/L) compared with SH (71, 64–83 g/dL) (P < .05).

Conclusions

Warmbloods had decreased WBC and lymphocyte counts compared with Thoroughbreds and SH, and Thoroughbreds had increased red blood cell counts. Thoroughbreds had lower total protein concentrations than SH. Clinicians should consider breed differences when interpreting hematologic values.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Veterinary clinical pathology
Veterinary clinical pathology 农林科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
133
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: Veterinary Clinical Pathology is the official journal of the American Society for Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ASVCP) and the European Society of Veterinary Clinical Pathology (ESVCP). The journal''s mission is to provide an international forum for communication and discussion of scientific investigations and new developments that advance the art and science of laboratory diagnosis in animals. Veterinary Clinical Pathology welcomes original experimental research and clinical contributions involving domestic, laboratory, avian, and wildlife species in the areas of hematology, hemostasis, immunopathology, clinical chemistry, cytopathology, surgical pathology, toxicology, endocrinology, laboratory and analytical techniques, instrumentation, quality assurance, and clinical pathology education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信