对美国大学生玩饮酒游戏动机量表(MPDG-33)修订版的确认性因子分析

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Byron L Zamboanga, Amie R Newins, Janine V Olthuis, Jennifer E Merrill, Heidemarie Blumenthal, Su Yeong Kim, Timothy J Grigsby, Patrick McClain, Dennis McChargue, Miguel Ángel Cano
{"title":"对美国大学生玩饮酒游戏动机量表(MPDG-33)修订版的确认性因子分析","authors":"Byron L Zamboanga, Amie R Newins, Janine V Olthuis, Jennifer E Merrill, Heidemarie Blumenthal, Su Yeong Kim, Timothy J Grigsby, Patrick McClain, Dennis McChargue, Miguel Ángel Cano","doi":"10.1093/alcalc/agae027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim Participating in a drinking game (DG) is common practice among university students and can increase students’ risk for heavy drinking. Given the theoretical link between motivations to drink and alcohol use, careful consideration should be given to students’ motivations to play DGs. In this study, we examined the factor structure, internal consistency, and concurrent validity of a revised version of the motives for playing drinking games (MPDG) scale, the MPDG-33. Methods University students (n = 3345, Mage = 19.77 years, SDage = 1.53; 68.8% = women; 59.6% = White) from 12 U.S. universities completed a confidential online self-report survey that included the MPDG-33 and questions regarding their frequency of DG participation and typical drink consumption while playing DGs. Results Confirmatory factor analysis indicated the 7-factor model fit the data adequately, and all items had statistically significant factor loadings on their predicted factor. All subscales had adequate to excellent internal consistency and were positively correlated with the frequency of DG participation and the typical number of drinks consumed while playing DGs (though the correlations were small). Conclusion Findings suggest that the MPDG-33 can be reliably used in research and clinical settings to assess U.S. university students’ motives for playing DGs.","PeriodicalId":7407,"journal":{"name":"Alcohol and alcoholism","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A confirmatory factor analysis of a revised motives for playing drinking games (MPDG-33) scale among university students in the United States\",\"authors\":\"Byron L Zamboanga, Amie R Newins, Janine V Olthuis, Jennifer E Merrill, Heidemarie Blumenthal, Su Yeong Kim, Timothy J Grigsby, Patrick McClain, Dennis McChargue, Miguel Ángel Cano\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/alcalc/agae027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim Participating in a drinking game (DG) is common practice among university students and can increase students’ risk for heavy drinking. Given the theoretical link between motivations to drink and alcohol use, careful consideration should be given to students’ motivations to play DGs. In this study, we examined the factor structure, internal consistency, and concurrent validity of a revised version of the motives for playing drinking games (MPDG) scale, the MPDG-33. Methods University students (n = 3345, Mage = 19.77 years, SDage = 1.53; 68.8% = women; 59.6% = White) from 12 U.S. universities completed a confidential online self-report survey that included the MPDG-33 and questions regarding their frequency of DG participation and typical drink consumption while playing DGs. Results Confirmatory factor analysis indicated the 7-factor model fit the data adequately, and all items had statistically significant factor loadings on their predicted factor. All subscales had adequate to excellent internal consistency and were positively correlated with the frequency of DG participation and the typical number of drinks consumed while playing DGs (though the correlations were small). Conclusion Findings suggest that the MPDG-33 can be reliably used in research and clinical settings to assess U.S. university students’ motives for playing DGs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alcohol and alcoholism\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alcohol and alcoholism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agae027\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alcohol and alcoholism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/alcalc/agae027","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 参与饮酒游戏(DG)是大学生的常见行为,可能会增加学生大量饮酒的风险。鉴于饮酒动机与饮酒之间的理论联系,应仔细考虑学生玩饮酒游戏的动机。在本研究中,我们考察了修订版的饮酒游戏动机(MPDG)量表(MPDG-33)的因子结构、内部一致性和并发效度。方法 来自美国 12 所大学的大学生(n = 3345,Mage = 19.77 岁,SDage = 1.53;68.8% = 女性;59.6% = 白人)完成了一项保密的在线自我报告调查,其中包括 MPDG-33 以及有关他们参与酒类游戏的频率和玩酒类游戏时的典型饮酒量的问题。结果 证实性因素分析表明,7 个因素模型充分拟合了数据,所有项目在其预测因素上都具有统计意义上的因素负荷。所有分量表都具有充分到极好的内部一致性,并且与参与危险品游戏的频率和玩危险品游戏时的典型饮酒量呈正相关(尽管相关性很小)。结论 研究结果表明,MPDG-33 可以在研究和临床环境中可靠地用于评估美国大学生玩电子游戏的动机。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A confirmatory factor analysis of a revised motives for playing drinking games (MPDG-33) scale among university students in the United States
Aim Participating in a drinking game (DG) is common practice among university students and can increase students’ risk for heavy drinking. Given the theoretical link between motivations to drink and alcohol use, careful consideration should be given to students’ motivations to play DGs. In this study, we examined the factor structure, internal consistency, and concurrent validity of a revised version of the motives for playing drinking games (MPDG) scale, the MPDG-33. Methods University students (n = 3345, Mage = 19.77 years, SDage = 1.53; 68.8% = women; 59.6% = White) from 12 U.S. universities completed a confidential online self-report survey that included the MPDG-33 and questions regarding their frequency of DG participation and typical drink consumption while playing DGs. Results Confirmatory factor analysis indicated the 7-factor model fit the data adequately, and all items had statistically significant factor loadings on their predicted factor. All subscales had adequate to excellent internal consistency and were positively correlated with the frequency of DG participation and the typical number of drinks consumed while playing DGs (though the correlations were small). Conclusion Findings suggest that the MPDG-33 can be reliably used in research and clinical settings to assess U.S. university students’ motives for playing DGs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alcohol and alcoholism
Alcohol and alcoholism 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
62
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: About the Journal Alcohol and Alcoholism publishes papers on the biomedical, psychological, and sociological aspects of alcoholism and alcohol research, provided that they make a new and significant contribution to knowledge in the field. Papers include new results obtained experimentally, descriptions of new experimental (including clinical) methods of importance to the field of alcohol research and treatment, or new interpretations of existing results. Theoretical contributions are considered equally with papers dealing with experimental work provided that such theoretical contributions are not of a largely speculative or philosophical nature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信