猛禽铅中毒:科学现状与全球性问题的跨学科缓解方案

IF 11 1区 生物学 Q1 BIOLOGY
Todd E. Katzner, Deborah J. Pain, Michael McTee, Leland Brown, Sandra Cuadros, Mark Pokras, Vincent A. Slabe, Richard T. Watson, Guillermo Wiemeyer, Bryan Bedrosian, Jordan O. Hampton, Chris N. Parish, James M. Pay, Keisuke Saito, John H. Schulz
{"title":"猛禽铅中毒:科学现状与全球性问题的跨学科缓解方案","authors":"Todd E. Katzner,&nbsp;Deborah J. Pain,&nbsp;Michael McTee,&nbsp;Leland Brown,&nbsp;Sandra Cuadros,&nbsp;Mark Pokras,&nbsp;Vincent A. Slabe,&nbsp;Richard T. Watson,&nbsp;Guillermo Wiemeyer,&nbsp;Bryan Bedrosian,&nbsp;Jordan O. Hampton,&nbsp;Chris N. Parish,&nbsp;James M. Pay,&nbsp;Keisuke Saito,&nbsp;John H. Schulz","doi":"10.1111/brv.13087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Lead poisoning is an important global conservation problem for many species of wildlife, especially raptors. Despite the increasing number of individual studies and regional reviews of lead poisoning of raptors, it has been over a decade since this information has been compiled into a comprehensive global review. Here, we summarize the state of knowledge of lead poisoning of raptors, we review developments in manufacturing of non-lead ammunition, the use of which can reduce the most pervasive source of lead these birds encounter, and we compile data on voluntary and regulatory mitigation options and their associated sociological context. We support our literature review with case studies of mitigation actions, largely provided by the conservation practitioners who study or manage these efforts. Our review illustrates the growing awareness and understanding of lead exposure of raptors, and it shows that the science underpinning this understanding has expanded considerably in recent years. We also show that the political and social appetite for managing lead ammunition appears to vary substantially across administrative regions, countries, and continents. Improved understanding of the drivers of this variation could support more effective mitigation of lead exposure of wildlife. This review also shows that mitigation strategies are likely to be most effective when they are outcome driven, consider behavioural theory, local cultures, and environmental conditions, effectively monitor participation, compliance, and levels of raptor exposure, and support both environmental and human health.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":133,"journal":{"name":"Biological Reviews","volume":"99 5","pages":"1672-1699"},"PeriodicalIF":11.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lead poisoning of raptors: state of the science and cross-discipline mitigation options for a global problem\",\"authors\":\"Todd E. Katzner,&nbsp;Deborah J. Pain,&nbsp;Michael McTee,&nbsp;Leland Brown,&nbsp;Sandra Cuadros,&nbsp;Mark Pokras,&nbsp;Vincent A. Slabe,&nbsp;Richard T. Watson,&nbsp;Guillermo Wiemeyer,&nbsp;Bryan Bedrosian,&nbsp;Jordan O. Hampton,&nbsp;Chris N. Parish,&nbsp;James M. Pay,&nbsp;Keisuke Saito,&nbsp;John H. Schulz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/brv.13087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Lead poisoning is an important global conservation problem for many species of wildlife, especially raptors. Despite the increasing number of individual studies and regional reviews of lead poisoning of raptors, it has been over a decade since this information has been compiled into a comprehensive global review. Here, we summarize the state of knowledge of lead poisoning of raptors, we review developments in manufacturing of non-lead ammunition, the use of which can reduce the most pervasive source of lead these birds encounter, and we compile data on voluntary and regulatory mitigation options and their associated sociological context. We support our literature review with case studies of mitigation actions, largely provided by the conservation practitioners who study or manage these efforts. Our review illustrates the growing awareness and understanding of lead exposure of raptors, and it shows that the science underpinning this understanding has expanded considerably in recent years. We also show that the political and social appetite for managing lead ammunition appears to vary substantially across administrative regions, countries, and continents. Improved understanding of the drivers of this variation could support more effective mitigation of lead exposure of wildlife. This review also shows that mitigation strategies are likely to be most effective when they are outcome driven, consider behavioural theory, local cultures, and environmental conditions, effectively monitor participation, compliance, and levels of raptor exposure, and support both environmental and human health.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological Reviews\",\"volume\":\"99 5\",\"pages\":\"1672-1699\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.13087\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/brv.13087","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

铅中毒是许多野生动物,尤其是猛禽物种面临的一个重要的全球性保护问题。尽管有关猛禽铅中毒的个别研究和地区性综述越来越多,但十多年来这些信息一直没有被汇编成一份全面的全球综述。在此,我们总结了有关猛禽铅中毒的知识现状,回顾了无铅弹药制造的发展情况,使用无铅弹药可以减少这些鸟类所接触到的最普遍的铅来源,我们还汇编了有关自愿性和监管性缓解方案及其相关社会学背景的数据。我们的文献综述还辅以缓解行动的案例研究,这些案例研究主要由研究或管理这些工作的保护工作者提供。我们的综述说明了人们对猛禽铅暴露的认识和理解在不断提高,并表明近年来支撑这种理解的科学已经有了很大的发展。我们还表明,管理铅弹药的政治和社会意愿似乎在不同的行政区域、国家和大陆之间存在很大差异。进一步了解这种差异的驱动因素,可以更有效地减少野生动物的铅暴露。这篇综述还表明,当缓解策略以结果为导向,考虑行为理论、当地文化和环境条件,有效监测参与情况、遵守情况和猛禽接触水平,并同时支持环境和人类健康时,这些策略可能最为有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lead poisoning of raptors: state of the science and cross-discipline mitigation options for a global problem

Lead poisoning is an important global conservation problem for many species of wildlife, especially raptors. Despite the increasing number of individual studies and regional reviews of lead poisoning of raptors, it has been over a decade since this information has been compiled into a comprehensive global review. Here, we summarize the state of knowledge of lead poisoning of raptors, we review developments in manufacturing of non-lead ammunition, the use of which can reduce the most pervasive source of lead these birds encounter, and we compile data on voluntary and regulatory mitigation options and their associated sociological context. We support our literature review with case studies of mitigation actions, largely provided by the conservation practitioners who study or manage these efforts. Our review illustrates the growing awareness and understanding of lead exposure of raptors, and it shows that the science underpinning this understanding has expanded considerably in recent years. We also show that the political and social appetite for managing lead ammunition appears to vary substantially across administrative regions, countries, and continents. Improved understanding of the drivers of this variation could support more effective mitigation of lead exposure of wildlife. This review also shows that mitigation strategies are likely to be most effective when they are outcome driven, consider behavioural theory, local cultures, and environmental conditions, effectively monitor participation, compliance, and levels of raptor exposure, and support both environmental and human health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Reviews
Biological Reviews 生物-生物学
CiteScore
21.30
自引率
2.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Biological Reviews is a scientific journal that covers a wide range of topics in the biological sciences. It publishes several review articles per issue, which are aimed at both non-specialist biologists and researchers in the field. The articles are scholarly and include extensive bibliographies. Authors are instructed to be aware of the diverse readership and write their articles accordingly. The reviews in Biological Reviews serve as comprehensive introductions to specific fields, presenting the current state of the art and highlighting gaps in knowledge. Each article can be up to 20,000 words long and includes an abstract, a thorough introduction, and a statement of conclusions. The journal focuses on publishing synthetic reviews, which are based on existing literature and address important biological questions. These reviews are interesting to a broad readership and are timely, often related to fast-moving fields or new discoveries. A key aspect of a synthetic review is that it goes beyond simply compiling information and instead analyzes the collected data to create a new theoretical or conceptual framework that can significantly impact the field. Biological Reviews is abstracted and indexed in various databases, including Abstracts on Hygiene & Communicable Diseases, Academic Search, AgBiotech News & Information, AgBiotechNet, AGRICOLA Database, GeoRef, Global Health, SCOPUS, Weed Abstracts, and Reaction Citation Index, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信