全膀胱子宫内膜取样与标准护理的比较：随机对照试验

IF 8.3 2区材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1097/aog.0000000000005597

Erwina Hashim, Jesrine Hong, Yin Ling Woo, Mukhri Hamdan, Peng Chiong Tan

引用次数: 0

摘要

比较在膀胱充盈的情况下进行 Pipelle 子宫内膜取样的插入失败率与不进行宫颈操作的标准流程（不考虑膀胱状态）的插入失败率。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Pipelle Endometrial Sampling With a Full Bladder Compared With Standard Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

To compare insertion failure rates for Pipelle endometrial sampling with a full bladder compared with the standard process (not taking into account bladder status) without cervical manipulation.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 工程技术-材料科学：综合

CiteScore

16.00

自引率

6.30%

发文量

4978

审稿时长

1.8 months

期刊介绍： ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is a leading interdisciplinary journal that brings together chemists, engineers, physicists, and biologists to explore the development and utilization of newly-discovered materials and interfacial processes for specific applications. Our journal has experienced remarkable growth since its establishment in 2009, both in terms of the number of articles published and the impact of the research showcased. We are proud to foster a truly global community, with the majority of published articles originating from outside the United States, reflecting the rapid growth of applied research worldwide.