tDCS 对运动学习的强度依赖性效应与多巴胺有关

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Li-Ann Leow , Jiaqin Jiang , Samantha Bowers , Yuhan Zhang , Paul E. Dux , Hannah L. Filmer
{"title":"tDCS 对运动学习的强度依赖性效应与多巴胺有关","authors":"Li-Ann Leow ,&nbsp;Jiaqin Jiang ,&nbsp;Samantha Bowers ,&nbsp;Yuhan Zhang ,&nbsp;Paul E. Dux ,&nbsp;Hannah L. Filmer","doi":"10.1016/j.brs.2024.03.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), are popular methods for inducing neuroplastic changes to alter cognition and behaviour. One challenge for the field is to optimise stimulation protocols to maximise benefits. For this to happen, we need a better understanding of <em>how</em> stimulation modulates cortical functioning/behaviour. To date, there is increasing evidence for a dose-response relationship between tDCS and brain excitability, however how this relates to behaviour is not well understood. Even less is known about the neurochemical mechanisms which may drive the dose-response relationship between stimulation intensities and behaviour. Here, we examine the effect of three different tDCS stimulation intensities (1 mA, 2 mA, 4 mA anodal motor cortex tDCS) administered during the explicit learning of motor sequences. Further, to assess the role of dopamine in the dose-response relationship between tDCS intensities and behaviour, we examined how pharmacologically increasing dopamine availability, via 100 mg of levodopa, modulated the effect of stimulation on learning. In the absence of levodopa, we found that 4 mA tDCS improved and 1 mA tDCS impaired acquisition of motor sequences relative to sham stimulation. Conversely, levodopa reversed the beneficial effect of 4 mA tDCS. This effect of levodopa was no longer evident at the 48-h follow-up, consistent with previous work characterising the persistence of neuroplastic changes in the motor cortex resulting from combining levodopa with tDCS. These results provide the first direct evidence for a role of dopamine in the intensity-dependent effects of tDCS on behaviour.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9206,"journal":{"name":"Brain Stimulation","volume":"17 3","pages":"Pages 553-560"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X24000512/pdfft?md5=2b5366658698bacfd8a980c96f7d95f6&pid=1-s2.0-S1935861X24000512-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intensity-dependent effects of tDCS on motor learning are related to dopamine\",\"authors\":\"Li-Ann Leow ,&nbsp;Jiaqin Jiang ,&nbsp;Samantha Bowers ,&nbsp;Yuhan Zhang ,&nbsp;Paul E. Dux ,&nbsp;Hannah L. Filmer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brs.2024.03.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), are popular methods for inducing neuroplastic changes to alter cognition and behaviour. One challenge for the field is to optimise stimulation protocols to maximise benefits. For this to happen, we need a better understanding of <em>how</em> stimulation modulates cortical functioning/behaviour. To date, there is increasing evidence for a dose-response relationship between tDCS and brain excitability, however how this relates to behaviour is not well understood. Even less is known about the neurochemical mechanisms which may drive the dose-response relationship between stimulation intensities and behaviour. Here, we examine the effect of three different tDCS stimulation intensities (1 mA, 2 mA, 4 mA anodal motor cortex tDCS) administered during the explicit learning of motor sequences. Further, to assess the role of dopamine in the dose-response relationship between tDCS intensities and behaviour, we examined how pharmacologically increasing dopamine availability, via 100 mg of levodopa, modulated the effect of stimulation on learning. In the absence of levodopa, we found that 4 mA tDCS improved and 1 mA tDCS impaired acquisition of motor sequences relative to sham stimulation. Conversely, levodopa reversed the beneficial effect of 4 mA tDCS. This effect of levodopa was no longer evident at the 48-h follow-up, consistent with previous work characterising the persistence of neuroplastic changes in the motor cortex resulting from combining levodopa with tDCS. These results provide the first direct evidence for a role of dopamine in the intensity-dependent effects of tDCS on behaviour.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brain Stimulation\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 553-560\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X24000512/pdfft?md5=2b5366658698bacfd8a980c96f7d95f6&pid=1-s2.0-S1935861X24000512-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brain Stimulation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X24000512\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Stimulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1935861X24000512","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)等非侵入性脑刺激技术是诱导神经可塑性变化以改变认知和行为的常用方法。该领域面临的一个挑战是如何优化刺激方案,以获得最大效益。为此,我们需要更好地了解刺激是如何调节大脑皮层功能/行为的。迄今为止,越来越多的证据表明,tDCS 与大脑兴奋性之间存在剂量-反应关系,但这与行为之间的关系如何还不十分清楚。人们对可能驱动刺激强度与行为之间剂量-反应关系的神经化学机制了解得更少。在此,我们研究了在运动序列的显性学习过程中,三种不同的 tDCS 刺激强度(1 mA、2 mA、4 mA 阳极运动皮层 tDCS)所产生的影响。此外,为了评估多巴胺在 tDCS 强度与行为之间的剂量-反应关系中的作用,我们研究了通过 100 毫克左旋多巴药理增加多巴胺的可用性如何调节刺激对学习的影响。我们发现,在没有左旋多巴的情况下,相对于假刺激,4 毫安 tDCS 可改善运动序列的获得,而 1 毫安 tDCS 则会损害运动序列的获得。相反,左旋多巴逆转了 4 毫安 tDCS 的有益效果。左旋多巴的这种作用在 48 小时的随访中不再明显,这与之前的研究结果一致,即左旋多巴与 tDCS 的结合会导致运动皮层的神经可塑性变化持续存在。这些结果首次直接证明了多巴胺在 tDCS 对行为的强度依赖性效应中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intensity-dependent effects of tDCS on motor learning are related to dopamine

Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), are popular methods for inducing neuroplastic changes to alter cognition and behaviour. One challenge for the field is to optimise stimulation protocols to maximise benefits. For this to happen, we need a better understanding of how stimulation modulates cortical functioning/behaviour. To date, there is increasing evidence for a dose-response relationship between tDCS and brain excitability, however how this relates to behaviour is not well understood. Even less is known about the neurochemical mechanisms which may drive the dose-response relationship between stimulation intensities and behaviour. Here, we examine the effect of three different tDCS stimulation intensities (1 mA, 2 mA, 4 mA anodal motor cortex tDCS) administered during the explicit learning of motor sequences. Further, to assess the role of dopamine in the dose-response relationship between tDCS intensities and behaviour, we examined how pharmacologically increasing dopamine availability, via 100 mg of levodopa, modulated the effect of stimulation on learning. In the absence of levodopa, we found that 4 mA tDCS improved and 1 mA tDCS impaired acquisition of motor sequences relative to sham stimulation. Conversely, levodopa reversed the beneficial effect of 4 mA tDCS. This effect of levodopa was no longer evident at the 48-h follow-up, consistent with previous work characterising the persistence of neuroplastic changes in the motor cortex resulting from combining levodopa with tDCS. These results provide the first direct evidence for a role of dopamine in the intensity-dependent effects of tDCS on behaviour.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Stimulation
Brain Stimulation 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
256
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Brain Stimulation publishes on the entire field of brain stimulation, including noninvasive and invasive techniques and technologies that alter brain function through the use of electrical, magnetic, radiowave, or focally targeted pharmacologic stimulation. Brain Stimulation aims to be the premier journal for publication of original research in the field of neuromodulation. The journal includes: a) Original articles; b) Short Communications; c) Invited and original reviews; d) Technology and methodological perspectives (reviews of new devices, description of new methods, etc.); and e) Letters to the Editor. Special issues of the journal will be considered based on scientific merit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信