利用 16S rRNA 图谱分析不同饲养策略获得的干腌火腿微生物群在 12 个月调味期的特征

IF 4.5 1区 农林科学 Q1 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Alessandro Toscano, Diana Giannuzzi, Isaac Hyeladi Malgwi, Saptharati Deb, Chiara Broccanello, Andrea Squartini, Piergiorgio Stevanato, Alessio Cecchinato, Luigi Gallo, Stefano Schiavon
{"title":"利用 16S rRNA 图谱分析不同饲养策略获得的干腌火腿微生物群在 12 个月调味期的特征","authors":"Alessandro Toscano,&nbsp;Diana Giannuzzi,&nbsp;Isaac Hyeladi Malgwi,&nbsp;Saptharati Deb,&nbsp;Chiara Broccanello,&nbsp;Andrea Squartini,&nbsp;Piergiorgio Stevanato,&nbsp;Alessio Cecchinato,&nbsp;Luigi Gallo,&nbsp;Stefano Schiavon","doi":"10.1016/j.fm.2024.104558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, we investigated the microbiota of 72 Italian ham samples collected after 12 months of seasoning. The hams were elaborated from pigs fed different rearing methods, including the traditional restricted medium protein diet chosen as control (C group); restrictive low protein diet (LP group); two <em>ad libitum</em> high-protein diet groups (HP9M group: slaughter at 9 months of age; HP170 group: slaughter at 170 kg). A multi-amplicon 16S metabarcoding approach was used, and a total of 2845 Amplicon Sequence Variants were obtained from the 72 ham samples. Main phyla included: Firmicutes (90.8%), Actinobacteria (6.2%), Proteobacteria (2.7%), and Bacteroidota (0.12%). The most common genera were <em>Staphylococcus, Tetragenococcus, and Brevibacterium</em>. Shannon index for α-diversity was found statistically significant, notably for the HP9M group, indicating higher diversity compared to C. PERMANOVA test on β-diversity showed significant differences in rearing methods between HP170 and C, HP170 and LP, and HP9M vs. C. All three rearing methods revealed associations with characteristic communities: the HP9M group had the highest number of associations, many of which were due to spoilage bacteria, whereas the LP group had the highest number of seasoning-favourable genera.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12399,"journal":{"name":"Food microbiology","volume":"122 ","pages":"Article 104558"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740002024000960/pdfft?md5=490310142a3cff831ba826f6ceea8ac5&pid=1-s2.0-S0740002024000960-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of dry-cured ham microbiota at 12 months of seasoning obtained from different rearing strategies using 16S rRNA profiling\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Toscano,&nbsp;Diana Giannuzzi,&nbsp;Isaac Hyeladi Malgwi,&nbsp;Saptharati Deb,&nbsp;Chiara Broccanello,&nbsp;Andrea Squartini,&nbsp;Piergiorgio Stevanato,&nbsp;Alessio Cecchinato,&nbsp;Luigi Gallo,&nbsp;Stefano Schiavon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fm.2024.104558\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study, we investigated the microbiota of 72 Italian ham samples collected after 12 months of seasoning. The hams were elaborated from pigs fed different rearing methods, including the traditional restricted medium protein diet chosen as control (C group); restrictive low protein diet (LP group); two <em>ad libitum</em> high-protein diet groups (HP9M group: slaughter at 9 months of age; HP170 group: slaughter at 170 kg). A multi-amplicon 16S metabarcoding approach was used, and a total of 2845 Amplicon Sequence Variants were obtained from the 72 ham samples. Main phyla included: Firmicutes (90.8%), Actinobacteria (6.2%), Proteobacteria (2.7%), and Bacteroidota (0.12%). The most common genera were <em>Staphylococcus, Tetragenococcus, and Brevibacterium</em>. Shannon index for α-diversity was found statistically significant, notably for the HP9M group, indicating higher diversity compared to C. PERMANOVA test on β-diversity showed significant differences in rearing methods between HP170 and C, HP170 and LP, and HP9M vs. C. All three rearing methods revealed associations with characteristic communities: the HP9M group had the highest number of associations, many of which were due to spoilage bacteria, whereas the LP group had the highest number of seasoning-favourable genera.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food microbiology\",\"volume\":\"122 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104558\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740002024000960/pdfft?md5=490310142a3cff831ba826f6ceea8ac5&pid=1-s2.0-S0740002024000960-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740002024000960\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740002024000960","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这项研究中,我们调查了 72 份经过 12 个月调味后采集的意大利火腿样本中的微生物群。这些火腿由不同饲养方法的猪制成,包括传统的限制性中等蛋白日粮对照组(C 组)、限制性低蛋白日粮对照组(LP 组)和两个自由高蛋白日粮组(HP9M 组:9 月龄屠宰;HP170 组:170 公斤屠宰)。采用多扩增子 16S 代谢编码方法,从 72 个火腿样本中获得了 2845 个扩增子序列变异。主要门类包括主要门类包括:固着菌(90.8%)、放线菌(6.2%)、变形菌(2.7%)和类杆菌(0.12%)。最常见的菌属是葡萄球菌、四源球菌和 Brevibacterium。对 β 多样性的 PERMANOVA 检验表明,HP170 与 C、HP170 与 LP、HP9M 与 C 之间的饲养方法存在显著差异。所有三种饲养方法都显示出与特征群落的关联:HP9M 组的关联数量最多,其中许多是腐败菌引起的,而 LP 组的调味菌属数量最多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Characterization of dry-cured ham microbiota at 12 months of seasoning obtained from different rearing strategies using 16S rRNA profiling

In this study, we investigated the microbiota of 72 Italian ham samples collected after 12 months of seasoning. The hams were elaborated from pigs fed different rearing methods, including the traditional restricted medium protein diet chosen as control (C group); restrictive low protein diet (LP group); two ad libitum high-protein diet groups (HP9M group: slaughter at 9 months of age; HP170 group: slaughter at 170 kg). A multi-amplicon 16S metabarcoding approach was used, and a total of 2845 Amplicon Sequence Variants were obtained from the 72 ham samples. Main phyla included: Firmicutes (90.8%), Actinobacteria (6.2%), Proteobacteria (2.7%), and Bacteroidota (0.12%). The most common genera were Staphylococcus, Tetragenococcus, and Brevibacterium. Shannon index for α-diversity was found statistically significant, notably for the HP9M group, indicating higher diversity compared to C. PERMANOVA test on β-diversity showed significant differences in rearing methods between HP170 and C, HP170 and LP, and HP9M vs. C. All three rearing methods revealed associations with characteristic communities: the HP9M group had the highest number of associations, many of which were due to spoilage bacteria, whereas the LP group had the highest number of seasoning-favourable genera.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Food microbiology
Food microbiology 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
11.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
179
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Food Microbiology publishes original research articles, short communications, review papers, letters, news items and book reviews dealing with all aspects of the microbiology of foods. The editors aim to publish manuscripts of the highest quality which are both relevant and applicable to the broad field covered by the journal. Studies must be novel, have a clear connection to food microbiology, and be of general interest to the international community of food microbiologists. The editors make every effort to ensure rapid and fair reviews, resulting in timely publication of accepted manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信