评估埃塞俄比亚玉米储存设施在控制储存害虫方面的性能

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Liya Meseret Kebede , Chemeda Abedeta Garbaba , Chala G. Kuyu , Birhane Atnafu , Esayas Mendesil
{"title":"评估埃塞俄比亚玉米储存设施在控制储存害虫方面的性能","authors":"Liya Meseret Kebede ,&nbsp;Chemeda Abedeta Garbaba ,&nbsp;Chala G. Kuyu ,&nbsp;Birhane Atnafu ,&nbsp;Esayas Mendesil","doi":"10.1016/j.jspr.2024.102336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Maize plays a vital role in Ethiopia's food security, supporting the lives of millions of people. However, postharvest grain deterioration due to insect infestation is a significant issue. To address this and improve food availability, reducing storage losses is essential. The experiments were carried out in both indoor and outdoor settings, where the indoor experiment evaluated the effectiveness of different storage facilities (jute sack, PICS bag, fertilizer bag, AgroZ® bag, and polypropylene bag) over varying durations (0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 months) in three replications. In the outdoor experiment, traditional and modified <em>gombisa</em> constructed in an open field at the Jimma University Research Site (Eladale), along with different storage duration (initial loading, 2, 4, 6, and 8 months after storage), were evaluated in three replications. The data collected included grain damage percentage, weight loss, seed germination, and proximate analysis. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in grain damage, weight loss, and seed germination of grains stored in different storage types. Jute sacks showed the most severe damage to grains and weight loss, while PICS and AgroZ® bags had the lowest values. The PICS and AgroZ® bags exhibited the highest seed germination, while the Jute bags had the lowest. In particular, traditional <em>gombisa</em> storage resulted in more significant grain damage, weight loss, and reduced germination than modified <em>gombisa</em>. As storage duration increased, grain damage and weight loss increased significantly in Jute sacks, Polyethylene bags, and traditional <em>gombisa</em>. Furthermore, the proximate analysis showed that storage periods and facilities significantly affected the characteristics of the quality of the maize grain. The moisture content, the crude protein, and the crude fat decreased with longer storage durations in all storage types, while the crude fiber and the ash content increased. The results confirmed the effectiveness of PICS, AgroZ® bags, and modified <em>gombisa</em> in reducing the qualitative and quantitative losses caused by the infestation of storage insect pests. These storage methods can be recommended to protect maize grain for eight months.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17019,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Stored Products Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of the performance of maize storage facilities for control of storage insect pests in Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Liya Meseret Kebede ,&nbsp;Chemeda Abedeta Garbaba ,&nbsp;Chala G. Kuyu ,&nbsp;Birhane Atnafu ,&nbsp;Esayas Mendesil\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jspr.2024.102336\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Maize plays a vital role in Ethiopia's food security, supporting the lives of millions of people. However, postharvest grain deterioration due to insect infestation is a significant issue. To address this and improve food availability, reducing storage losses is essential. The experiments were carried out in both indoor and outdoor settings, where the indoor experiment evaluated the effectiveness of different storage facilities (jute sack, PICS bag, fertilizer bag, AgroZ® bag, and polypropylene bag) over varying durations (0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 months) in three replications. In the outdoor experiment, traditional and modified <em>gombisa</em> constructed in an open field at the Jimma University Research Site (Eladale), along with different storage duration (initial loading, 2, 4, 6, and 8 months after storage), were evaluated in three replications. The data collected included grain damage percentage, weight loss, seed germination, and proximate analysis. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in grain damage, weight loss, and seed germination of grains stored in different storage types. Jute sacks showed the most severe damage to grains and weight loss, while PICS and AgroZ® bags had the lowest values. The PICS and AgroZ® bags exhibited the highest seed germination, while the Jute bags had the lowest. In particular, traditional <em>gombisa</em> storage resulted in more significant grain damage, weight loss, and reduced germination than modified <em>gombisa</em>. As storage duration increased, grain damage and weight loss increased significantly in Jute sacks, Polyethylene bags, and traditional <em>gombisa</em>. Furthermore, the proximate analysis showed that storage periods and facilities significantly affected the characteristics of the quality of the maize grain. The moisture content, the crude protein, and the crude fat decreased with longer storage durations in all storage types, while the crude fiber and the ash content increased. The results confirmed the effectiveness of PICS, AgroZ® bags, and modified <em>gombisa</em> in reducing the qualitative and quantitative losses caused by the infestation of storage insect pests. These storage methods can be recommended to protect maize grain for eight months.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17019,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Stored Products Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Stored Products Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022474X24000936\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Stored Products Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022474X24000936","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

玉米在埃塞俄比亚的粮食安全中发挥着至关重要的作用,支撑着数百万人的生活。然而,虫害导致的收获后谷物变质是一个重大问题。为解决这一问题并提高粮食供应,减少储藏损失至关重要。实验在室内和室外环境下进行,其中室内实验评估了不同储藏设施(黄麻袋、PICS 袋、肥料袋、AgroZ® 袋和聚丙烯袋)在不同期限(0、2、4、6 和 8 个月)内的效果,共分三次重复。在室外试验中,在吉马大学研究基地(Eladale)的一块空地上建造的传统和改良 Gombisa,以及不同的储藏期限(初始装载、储藏后 2、4、6 和 8 个月),在三个重复中进行了评估。收集的数据包括谷粒损伤率、重量损失、种子发芽率和近似物分析。统计分析显示,不同储藏类型的谷物在谷粒损伤、重量损失和种子发芽率方面存在显著差异。黄麻袋对谷物的损坏和重量损失最为严重,而 PICS 和 AgroZ® 袋的损坏和重量损失值最低。PICS 和 AgroZ® 袋的种子发芽率最高,而黄麻袋的种子发芽率最低。特别是,与改良贡比萨相比,传统贡比萨贮藏导致的谷物损伤、重量损失和发芽率降低更为严重。随着贮藏时间的延长,黄麻袋、聚乙烯袋和传统贡比萨的谷粒破损和重量损失显著增加。此外,近似物分析表明,贮藏时间和贮藏设施对玉米粒的质量特性有很大影响。在所有储存类型中,水分含量、粗蛋白和粗脂肪含量随着储存时间的延长而降低,而粗纤维和灰分含量则有所增加。研究结果证实,PICS、AgroZ® 袋和改良贡比萨能有效减少储存虫害造成的质量和数量损失。建议使用这些储存方法来保护玉米谷物达八个月之久。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of the performance of maize storage facilities for control of storage insect pests in Ethiopia

Maize plays a vital role in Ethiopia's food security, supporting the lives of millions of people. However, postharvest grain deterioration due to insect infestation is a significant issue. To address this and improve food availability, reducing storage losses is essential. The experiments were carried out in both indoor and outdoor settings, where the indoor experiment evaluated the effectiveness of different storage facilities (jute sack, PICS bag, fertilizer bag, AgroZ® bag, and polypropylene bag) over varying durations (0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 months) in three replications. In the outdoor experiment, traditional and modified gombisa constructed in an open field at the Jimma University Research Site (Eladale), along with different storage duration (initial loading, 2, 4, 6, and 8 months after storage), were evaluated in three replications. The data collected included grain damage percentage, weight loss, seed germination, and proximate analysis. Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in grain damage, weight loss, and seed germination of grains stored in different storage types. Jute sacks showed the most severe damage to grains and weight loss, while PICS and AgroZ® bags had the lowest values. The PICS and AgroZ® bags exhibited the highest seed germination, while the Jute bags had the lowest. In particular, traditional gombisa storage resulted in more significant grain damage, weight loss, and reduced germination than modified gombisa. As storage duration increased, grain damage and weight loss increased significantly in Jute sacks, Polyethylene bags, and traditional gombisa. Furthermore, the proximate analysis showed that storage periods and facilities significantly affected the characteristics of the quality of the maize grain. The moisture content, the crude protein, and the crude fat decreased with longer storage durations in all storage types, while the crude fiber and the ash content increased. The results confirmed the effectiveness of PICS, AgroZ® bags, and modified gombisa in reducing the qualitative and quantitative losses caused by the infestation of storage insect pests. These storage methods can be recommended to protect maize grain for eight months.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
18.50%
发文量
112
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Stored Products Research provides an international medium for the publication of both reviews and original results from laboratory and field studies on the preservation and safety of stored products, notably food stocks, covering storage-related problems from the producer through the supply chain to the consumer. Stored products are characterised by having relatively low moisture content and include raw and semi-processed foods, animal feedstuffs, and a range of other durable items, including materials such as clothing or museum artefacts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信