从自律神经系统的角度看高频扩展正常的耳鸣患者的听觉障碍--努力还是疲劳?

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Eser Sendesen, Meral Didem Türkyılmaz
{"title":"从自律神经系统的角度看高频扩展正常的耳鸣患者的听觉障碍--努力还是疲劳?","authors":"Eser Sendesen,&nbsp;Meral Didem Türkyılmaz","doi":"10.1016/j.anl.2024.04.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>In previous studies, the results regarding the presence of listening effort or fatigue in tinnitus patients were inconsistent. The reason for this inconsistency could be that extended high frequencies, which can cause listening handicap, were not within normal limits. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the listening skills in tinnitus patients by matching the normal hearing thresholds at all frequencies, including the extended high frequency.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eighteen chronic tinnitus patients and thirty matched healthy controls having normal pure-tone average with symmetrical hearing thresholds was included. Subjects were evaluated with 0.125–20 kHz pure-tone audiometry, Montreal cognitive assessment test (MoCA), Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Matrix Test, Pupillometry.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Pupil dilatation in the 'coding' phase of the sentence presented in tinnitus patients was less than in the control group (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). There was no difference between the groups for Matrix test scores (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05) Also, there was no statistically significant correlation between THI and Pupillometry components nor between MoCA (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Even though tinnitus patients had normal hearing in the range of 0.125–20 kHz, their autonomic nervous system responses during listening differed from healthy subjects. This difference was interpreted for potential listening fatigue in tinnitus patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55627,"journal":{"name":"Auris Nasus Larynx","volume":"51 4","pages":"Pages 659-665"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Listening handicap in tinnitus patients with normal extended high frequencies from the perspective of the autonomic nervous system–Effort or fatigue?\",\"authors\":\"Eser Sendesen,&nbsp;Meral Didem Türkyılmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anl.2024.04.009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>In previous studies, the results regarding the presence of listening effort or fatigue in tinnitus patients were inconsistent. The reason for this inconsistency could be that extended high frequencies, which can cause listening handicap, were not within normal limits. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the listening skills in tinnitus patients by matching the normal hearing thresholds at all frequencies, including the extended high frequency.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eighteen chronic tinnitus patients and thirty matched healthy controls having normal pure-tone average with symmetrical hearing thresholds was included. Subjects were evaluated with 0.125–20 kHz pure-tone audiometry, Montreal cognitive assessment test (MoCA), Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Matrix Test, Pupillometry.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Pupil dilatation in the 'coding' phase of the sentence presented in tinnitus patients was less than in the control group (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05). There was no difference between the groups for Matrix test scores (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05) Also, there was no statistically significant correlation between THI and Pupillometry components nor between MoCA (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Even though tinnitus patients had normal hearing in the range of 0.125–20 kHz, their autonomic nervous system responses during listening differed from healthy subjects. This difference was interpreted for potential listening fatigue in tinnitus patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Auris Nasus Larynx\",\"volume\":\"51 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 659-665\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Auris Nasus Larynx\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0385814624000592\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Auris Nasus Larynx","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0385814624000592","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目标在以往的研究中,关于耳鸣患者是否存在听力疲劳的结果并不一致。造成这种不一致的原因可能是可能导致听力障碍的扩展高频不在正常范围内。因此,本研究旨在通过匹配正常听阈的所有频率(包括扩展高频)来评估耳鸣患者的听力技能。对受试者进行了 0.125-20 kHz 纯音测听、蒙特利尔认知评估测试 (MoCA)、耳鸣障碍量表 (THI)、矩阵测试和瞳孔测量。结果耳鸣患者在句子 "编码 "阶段的瞳孔扩张小于对照组(p < 0.05)。结论尽管耳鸣患者在 0.125-20 kHz 范围内听力正常,但他们在听力过程中的自律神经系统反应与健康人不同。这种差异被解释为耳鸣患者潜在的听觉疲劳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Listening handicap in tinnitus patients with normal extended high frequencies from the perspective of the autonomic nervous system–Effort or fatigue?

Objective

In previous studies, the results regarding the presence of listening effort or fatigue in tinnitus patients were inconsistent. The reason for this inconsistency could be that extended high frequencies, which can cause listening handicap, were not within normal limits. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the listening skills in tinnitus patients by matching the normal hearing thresholds at all frequencies, including the extended high frequency.

Methods

Eighteen chronic tinnitus patients and thirty matched healthy controls having normal pure-tone average with symmetrical hearing thresholds was included. Subjects were evaluated with 0.125–20 kHz pure-tone audiometry, Montreal cognitive assessment test (MoCA), Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Matrix Test, Pupillometry.

Results

Pupil dilatation in the 'coding' phase of the sentence presented in tinnitus patients was less than in the control group (p < 0.05). There was no difference between the groups for Matrix test scores (p > 0.05) Also, there was no statistically significant correlation between THI and Pupillometry components nor between MoCA (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

Even though tinnitus patients had normal hearing in the range of 0.125–20 kHz, their autonomic nervous system responses during listening differed from healthy subjects. This difference was interpreted for potential listening fatigue in tinnitus patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Auris Nasus Larynx
Auris Nasus Larynx 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
169
审稿时长
30 days
期刊介绍: The international journal Auris Nasus Larynx provides the opportunity for rapid, carefully reviewed publications concerning the fundamental and clinical aspects of otorhinolaryngology and related fields. This includes otology, neurotology, bronchoesophagology, laryngology, rhinology, allergology, head and neck medicine and oncologic surgery, maxillofacial and plastic surgery, audiology, speech science. Original papers, short communications and original case reports can be submitted. Reviews on recent developments are invited regularly and Letters to the Editor commenting on papers or any aspect of Auris Nasus Larynx are welcomed. Founded in 1973 and previously published by the Society for Promotion of International Otorhinolaryngology, the journal is now the official English-language journal of the Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Society of Japan, Inc. The aim of its new international Editorial Board is to make Auris Nasus Larynx an international forum for high quality research and clinical sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信