比较有腰背痛和无腰背痛的老年人下肢肌肉内非收缩组织的质量和数量、活动和平衡能力以及认知功能:试点研究

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mitsuhiro Masaki PT, PhD , Moeka Takeuchi PT , Karin Sugawara PT , Minori Yokota PT , Maki Kasahara PT
{"title":"比较有腰背痛和无腰背痛的老年人下肢肌肉内非收缩组织的质量和数量、活动和平衡能力以及认知功能:试点研究","authors":"Mitsuhiro Masaki PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Moeka Takeuchi PT ,&nbsp;Karin Sugawara PT ,&nbsp;Minori Yokota PT ,&nbsp;Maki Kasahara PT","doi":"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.04.055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This study compared the masses and amounts of intramuscular non-contractile tissue of multiple lower extremity muscles measured using an ultrasound imaging device, as well as the mobility and balance ability and cognitive function between community-dwelling older adults with and without low back pain (LBP).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-five community-dwelling older adults were classified into control (CTR) (n = 17, asymptomatic) and LBP (n = 8) groups. The current LBP status in the LBP group was as follows: duration period: 99.4 ± 81.3 months, Numerical Rating Scale: 4.8 ± 0.9, and Oswestry Disability Index: 15.3 ± 10.4%. The thicknesses and the echo intensities of various muscles (gluteus maximus, medius, and minimus; rectus femoris; vastus intermedius and lateralis; long and short heads of the biceps femoris; semitendinosus; semimembranosus; tibialis anterior; medial head of the gastrocnemius; soleus; and tibialis posterior) were measured using an ultrasound imaging device. Mobility and balance ability were assessed by measuring the usual and maximal walking speeds, timed up-and-go time, five-chair-stand time, and one-legged stance time. Mini-Mental State Examination scores were also assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The gluteus medius muscle thickness was significantly lower in the LBP group than in the CTR group. The thicknesses and echo intensities of the other lower extremity muscles did not differ significantly between the CTR and LBP groups. The usual walking speed was also significantly slower in the LBP group than in the CTR group. Balance ability and cognitive function did not differ significantly between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results of the present study demonstrated lower gluteus medius muscle mass and slower usual walking speed in community-dwelling older adults with LBP compared to those in older adults without LBP; however, other variables did not differ significantly between these groups.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the masses and amounts of intramuscular non-contractile tissue of the lower extremity muscles, mobility and balance ability, and cognitive function between older adults with and without low back pain: A pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Mitsuhiro Masaki PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Moeka Takeuchi PT ,&nbsp;Karin Sugawara PT ,&nbsp;Minori Yokota PT ,&nbsp;Maki Kasahara PT\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.04.055\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>This study compared the masses and amounts of intramuscular non-contractile tissue of multiple lower extremity muscles measured using an ultrasound imaging device, as well as the mobility and balance ability and cognitive function between community-dwelling older adults with and without low back pain (LBP).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Twenty-five community-dwelling older adults were classified into control (CTR) (n = 17, asymptomatic) and LBP (n = 8) groups. The current LBP status in the LBP group was as follows: duration period: 99.4 ± 81.3 months, Numerical Rating Scale: 4.8 ± 0.9, and Oswestry Disability Index: 15.3 ± 10.4%. The thicknesses and the echo intensities of various muscles (gluteus maximus, medius, and minimus; rectus femoris; vastus intermedius and lateralis; long and short heads of the biceps femoris; semitendinosus; semimembranosus; tibialis anterior; medial head of the gastrocnemius; soleus; and tibialis posterior) were measured using an ultrasound imaging device. Mobility and balance ability were assessed by measuring the usual and maximal walking speeds, timed up-and-go time, five-chair-stand time, and one-legged stance time. Mini-Mental State Examination scores were also assessed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The gluteus medius muscle thickness was significantly lower in the LBP group than in the CTR group. The thicknesses and echo intensities of the other lower extremity muscles did not differ significantly between the CTR and LBP groups. The usual walking speed was also significantly slower in the LBP group than in the CTR group. Balance ability and cognitive function did not differ significantly between the two groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The results of the present study demonstrated lower gluteus medius muscle mass and slower usual walking speed in community-dwelling older adults with LBP compared to those in older adults without LBP; however, other variables did not differ significantly between these groups.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":1,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":16.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accounts of Chemical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224002432\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1360859224002432","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

方法将 25 名社区老年人分为对照组(CTR)(17 人,无症状)和腰背痛组(8 人)。枸杞多糖症组目前的枸杞多糖症状况如下:持续时间:持续时间:99.4 ± 81.3 个月,数值评定量表:4.8 ± 0.9,持续时间:99.4 ± 81.3 个月:4.8±0.9,Oswestry 残疾指数:15.3±10.4%:15.3 ± 10.4%.使用超声波成像设备测量了各种肌肉(臀大肌、臀中肌和臀小肌;股直肌;股内侧肌和股外侧肌;股二头肌长头和短头;半腱肌;半膜肌;胫骨前肌;腓肠肌内侧头;比目鱼肌;胫骨后肌)的厚度和回声强度。通过测量通常和最大行走速度、定时起立时间、五椅站立时间和单腿站立时间来评估活动能力和平衡能力。结果 LBP 组的臀中肌厚度明显低于 CTR 组。其他下肢肌肉的厚度和回声强度在 CTR 组和 LBP 组之间没有明显差异。LBP 组的通常行走速度也明显慢于 CTR 组。本研究结果表明,与无枸杞痛的老年人相比,患有枸杞痛的社区居住老年人臀中肌肌肉质量较低,通常行走速度较慢;但是,这两组之间的其他变量没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the masses and amounts of intramuscular non-contractile tissue of the lower extremity muscles, mobility and balance ability, and cognitive function between older adults with and without low back pain: A pilot study

Introduction

This study compared the masses and amounts of intramuscular non-contractile tissue of multiple lower extremity muscles measured using an ultrasound imaging device, as well as the mobility and balance ability and cognitive function between community-dwelling older adults with and without low back pain (LBP).

Methods

Twenty-five community-dwelling older adults were classified into control (CTR) (n = 17, asymptomatic) and LBP (n = 8) groups. The current LBP status in the LBP group was as follows: duration period: 99.4 ± 81.3 months, Numerical Rating Scale: 4.8 ± 0.9, and Oswestry Disability Index: 15.3 ± 10.4%. The thicknesses and the echo intensities of various muscles (gluteus maximus, medius, and minimus; rectus femoris; vastus intermedius and lateralis; long and short heads of the biceps femoris; semitendinosus; semimembranosus; tibialis anterior; medial head of the gastrocnemius; soleus; and tibialis posterior) were measured using an ultrasound imaging device. Mobility and balance ability were assessed by measuring the usual and maximal walking speeds, timed up-and-go time, five-chair-stand time, and one-legged stance time. Mini-Mental State Examination scores were also assessed.

Results

The gluteus medius muscle thickness was significantly lower in the LBP group than in the CTR group. The thicknesses and echo intensities of the other lower extremity muscles did not differ significantly between the CTR and LBP groups. The usual walking speed was also significantly slower in the LBP group than in the CTR group. Balance ability and cognitive function did not differ significantly between the two groups.

Conclusion

The results of the present study demonstrated lower gluteus medius muscle mass and slower usual walking speed in community-dwelling older adults with LBP compared to those in older adults without LBP; however, other variables did not differ significantly between these groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信