哪些政策能有效促进中国动力电池的正规回收?

IF 9.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENERGY & FUELS
Energy Pub Date : 2024-07-15 Epub Date: 2024-04-26 DOI:10.1016/j.energy.2024.131445
Jingjing Li , Zhaoxin Wang , Hui Li , Jianling Jiao
{"title":"哪些政策能有效促进中国动力电池的正规回收?","authors":"Jingjing Li ,&nbsp;Zhaoxin Wang ,&nbsp;Hui Li ,&nbsp;Jianling Jiao","doi":"10.1016/j.energy.2024.131445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>China's power battery recycling (PBR) market is embryonic, facing a 'Gresham's Law’. A critical concern for the government is ascertaining policies that can effectively enhance formal PBR and boost the competitiveness of authorized channels. Our study develops an evolutionary game model incorporating the government, recyclers, and consumers, investigating the impact of subsidies for formal recyclers, consumer subsidies, and deposit refund policies on the formal recycling process. The main conclusions are as follows. (1) The evolutionary strategy for the PBR game system is (non-regulation, formal recycling, green behavior) when recyclers acquire substantial reputation gains from formal recycling, and a non-regulation approach outstrips the government's benefits from regulation. (2) Subsidies for recyclers are more effective in fostering formal recycling of power batteries than consumer subsidies. When the government subsidy to formal recyclers increases from 0 yuan/kWh to 40 yuan/kWh, The evolutionary stable state transitions from (regulation, informal recycling, non-green behavior) to (non-regulation, formal recycling, green behavior). The incentive impact of consumer subsidies is relatively negligible. (3) The deposit refund policy significantly advances formal PBR, with both the increase in deposit amounts and refund ratios capable of reversing the low rates of formal recycling.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":11647,"journal":{"name":"Energy","volume":"299 ","pages":"Article 131445"},"PeriodicalIF":9.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Which policy can effectively promote the formal recycling of power batteries in China?\",\"authors\":\"Jingjing Li ,&nbsp;Zhaoxin Wang ,&nbsp;Hui Li ,&nbsp;Jianling Jiao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.energy.2024.131445\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>China's power battery recycling (PBR) market is embryonic, facing a 'Gresham's Law’. A critical concern for the government is ascertaining policies that can effectively enhance formal PBR and boost the competitiveness of authorized channels. Our study develops an evolutionary game model incorporating the government, recyclers, and consumers, investigating the impact of subsidies for formal recyclers, consumer subsidies, and deposit refund policies on the formal recycling process. The main conclusions are as follows. (1) The evolutionary strategy for the PBR game system is (non-regulation, formal recycling, green behavior) when recyclers acquire substantial reputation gains from formal recycling, and a non-regulation approach outstrips the government's benefits from regulation. (2) Subsidies for recyclers are more effective in fostering formal recycling of power batteries than consumer subsidies. When the government subsidy to formal recyclers increases from 0 yuan/kWh to 40 yuan/kWh, The evolutionary stable state transitions from (regulation, informal recycling, non-green behavior) to (non-regulation, formal recycling, green behavior). The incentive impact of consumer subsidies is relatively negligible. (3) The deposit refund policy significantly advances formal PBR, with both the increase in deposit amounts and refund ratios capable of reversing the low rates of formal recycling.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy\",\"volume\":\"299 \",\"pages\":\"Article 131445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224012180\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/4/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544224012180","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/4/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中国的动力电池回收(PBR)市场尚处于萌芽阶段,面临着 "格雷沙姆法则"。政府面临的一个重要问题是,如何制定政策,有效加强正规的动力电池回收利用,并提高授权渠道的竞争力。我们的研究建立了一个包含政府、回收商和消费者的演化博弈模型,研究了正规回收商补贴、消费者补贴和押金退还政策对正规回收过程的影响。主要结论如下(1) 当回收者从正规回收中获得大量声誉收益时,PBR 博弈系统的演化策略为(非管制、正规回收、绿色行为),非管制方法超过了政府从管制中获得的收益。(2)对回收商的补贴比消费者补贴更能促进动力电池的正规回收。当政府对正规回收商的补贴从 0 元/千瓦时增加到 40 元/千瓦时时,演化稳定状态从(管制、非正规回收、非绿色行为)过渡到(非管制、正规回收、绿色行为)。消费者补贴的激励影响相对可以忽略不计。(3) 押金退还政策大大推进了正式的 PBR,押金金额和退还比例的增加都能够扭转正式回收率低的局面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Which policy can effectively promote the formal recycling of power batteries in China?

China's power battery recycling (PBR) market is embryonic, facing a 'Gresham's Law’. A critical concern for the government is ascertaining policies that can effectively enhance formal PBR and boost the competitiveness of authorized channels. Our study develops an evolutionary game model incorporating the government, recyclers, and consumers, investigating the impact of subsidies for formal recyclers, consumer subsidies, and deposit refund policies on the formal recycling process. The main conclusions are as follows. (1) The evolutionary strategy for the PBR game system is (non-regulation, formal recycling, green behavior) when recyclers acquire substantial reputation gains from formal recycling, and a non-regulation approach outstrips the government's benefits from regulation. (2) Subsidies for recyclers are more effective in fostering formal recycling of power batteries than consumer subsidies. When the government subsidy to formal recyclers increases from 0 yuan/kWh to 40 yuan/kWh, The evolutionary stable state transitions from (regulation, informal recycling, non-green behavior) to (non-regulation, formal recycling, green behavior). The incentive impact of consumer subsidies is relatively negligible. (3) The deposit refund policy significantly advances formal PBR, with both the increase in deposit amounts and refund ratios capable of reversing the low rates of formal recycling.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy
Energy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
14.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
14.2 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy is a multidisciplinary, international journal that publishes research and analysis in the field of energy engineering. Our aim is to become a leading peer-reviewed platform and a trusted source of information for energy-related topics. The journal covers a range of areas including mechanical engineering, thermal sciences, and energy analysis. We are particularly interested in research on energy modelling, prediction, integrated energy systems, planning, and management. Additionally, we welcome papers on energy conservation, efficiency, biomass and bioenergy, renewable energy, electricity supply and demand, energy storage, buildings, and economic and policy issues. These topics should align with our broader multidisciplinary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书