生物创新促进环境可持续性:生物能源技术预算与生态足迹之间的不对称关系

IF 5.9 3区 工程技术 Q1 AGRONOMY
Zhuangkuo Li, Chen Wang, Pengman Shi, Muntasir Murshed, Sajid Ali
{"title":"生物创新促进环境可持续性:生物能源技术预算与生态足迹之间的不对称关系","authors":"Zhuangkuo Li,&nbsp;Chen Wang,&nbsp;Pengman Shi,&nbsp;Muntasir Murshed,&nbsp;Sajid Ali","doi":"10.1111/gcbb.13144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>As the world grapples with sustainable energy and environmental preservation challenges, budgeting for bio-resilience emerges as a pivotal step toward environmental sustainability. Our investigation delves into the influence of bioenergy technology budgets on the ecological footprint (ECF) in the top 10 nations that invest in bioenergy research and development (USA, China, Brazil, Germany, Japan, Canada, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, and the Netherlands). Prior research depended on panel data methods to explore the bioenergy technology-environment nexus, disregarding the specific traits of individual countries. Contrarily, the existing research applies the quantile-on-quantile tool to improve the precision of our analysis by delivering a holistic worldwide viewpoint and customized perceptions for every economy. The findings indicate that dedicating budgets to bioenergy technology improves environmental quality by reducing ECF across several quantiles within our sample nations. Moreover, the outcomes uncover unique patterns in these relationships across multiple countries. These results stress the significance of policymakers conducting exhaustive assessments and implementing productive tactics to address bioenergy technology funding and ECF changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":55126,"journal":{"name":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","volume":"16 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.13144","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bio-innovation for environmental sustainability: Asymmetric nexus between bioenergy technology budgets and ecological footprint\",\"authors\":\"Zhuangkuo Li,&nbsp;Chen Wang,&nbsp;Pengman Shi,&nbsp;Muntasir Murshed,&nbsp;Sajid Ali\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/gcbb.13144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>As the world grapples with sustainable energy and environmental preservation challenges, budgeting for bio-resilience emerges as a pivotal step toward environmental sustainability. Our investigation delves into the influence of bioenergy technology budgets on the ecological footprint (ECF) in the top 10 nations that invest in bioenergy research and development (USA, China, Brazil, Germany, Japan, Canada, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, and the Netherlands). Prior research depended on panel data methods to explore the bioenergy technology-environment nexus, disregarding the specific traits of individual countries. Contrarily, the existing research applies the quantile-on-quantile tool to improve the precision of our analysis by delivering a holistic worldwide viewpoint and customized perceptions for every economy. The findings indicate that dedicating budgets to bioenergy technology improves environmental quality by reducing ECF across several quantiles within our sample nations. Moreover, the outcomes uncover unique patterns in these relationships across multiple countries. These results stress the significance of policymakers conducting exhaustive assessments and implementing productive tactics to address bioenergy technology funding and ECF changes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"volume\":\"16 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/gcbb.13144\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Change Biology Bioenergy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.13144\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Change Biology Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/gcbb.13144","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球努力应对可持续能源和环境保护挑战之际,生物复原力预算成为实现环境可持续性的关键一步。我们的研究深入探讨了生物能源技术预算对十大生物能源研发投资国(美国、中国、巴西、德国、日本、加拿大、瑞典、芬兰、丹麦和荷兰)生态足迹(ECF)的影响。之前的研究依赖于面板数据方法来探讨生物能源技术与环境之间的关系,忽略了各个国家的具体特征。与此相反,现有研究采用了 "量化对量化 "工具,通过提供全球整体视角和为每个经济体量身定制的看法,提高了我们分析的精确性。研究结果表明,在我们的样本国家中,将预算专门用于生物能源技术可通过减少几个量级的 ECF 来改善环境质量。此外,研究结果还发现了这些关系在多个国家中的独特模式。这些结果强调了政策制定者进行详尽评估和实施富有成效的策略以解决生物能源技术资金和 ECF 变化问题的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bio-innovation for environmental sustainability: Asymmetric nexus between bioenergy technology budgets and ecological footprint

Bio-innovation for environmental sustainability: Asymmetric nexus between bioenergy technology budgets and ecological footprint

As the world grapples with sustainable energy and environmental preservation challenges, budgeting for bio-resilience emerges as a pivotal step toward environmental sustainability. Our investigation delves into the influence of bioenergy technology budgets on the ecological footprint (ECF) in the top 10 nations that invest in bioenergy research and development (USA, China, Brazil, Germany, Japan, Canada, Sweden, Finland, Denmark, and the Netherlands). Prior research depended on panel data methods to explore the bioenergy technology-environment nexus, disregarding the specific traits of individual countries. Contrarily, the existing research applies the quantile-on-quantile tool to improve the precision of our analysis by delivering a holistic worldwide viewpoint and customized perceptions for every economy. The findings indicate that dedicating budgets to bioenergy technology improves environmental quality by reducing ECF across several quantiles within our sample nations. Moreover, the outcomes uncover unique patterns in these relationships across multiple countries. These results stress the significance of policymakers conducting exhaustive assessments and implementing productive tactics to address bioenergy technology funding and ECF changes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Global Change Biology Bioenergy
Global Change Biology Bioenergy AGRONOMY-ENERGY & FUELS
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: GCB Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers, review articles and commentaries that promote understanding of the interface between biological and environmental sciences and the production of fuels directly from plants, algae and waste. The scope of the journal extends to areas outside of biology to policy forum, socioeconomic analyses, technoeconomic analyses and systems analysis. Papers do not need a global change component for consideration for publication, it is viewed as implicit that most bioenergy will be beneficial in avoiding at least a part of the fossil fuel energy that would otherwise be used. Key areas covered by the journal: Bioenergy feedstock and bio-oil production: energy crops and algae their management,, genomics, genetic improvements, planting, harvesting, storage, transportation, integrated logistics, production modeling, composition and its modification, pests, diseases and weeds of feedstocks. Manuscripts concerning alternative energy based on biological mimicry are also encouraged (e.g. artificial photosynthesis). Biological Residues/Co-products: from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (stover, sugar, bio-plastics, etc.), algae processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Bioenergy and the Environment: ecosystem services, carbon mitigation, land use change, life cycle assessment, energy and greenhouse gas balances, water use, water quality, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues. Bioenergy Socioeconomics: examining the economic viability or social acceptability of crops, crops systems and their processing, including genetically modified organisms [GMOs], health impacts of bioenergy systems. Bioenergy Policy: legislative developments affecting biofuels and bioenergy. Bioenergy Systems Analysis: examining biological developments in a whole systems context.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信