主动休息与被动休息对运动的肌肉机械反应

IF 1.1 Q3 SPORT SCIENCES
Rodrigo Bueno-Russo , Jorge Velázquez Saornil , Germán Díaz-Ureña , Zacarías Sánchez Milá , Raúl Frutos Llanes , José Manuel Barragán Casas , David Rodríguez Sanz
{"title":"主动休息与被动休息对运动的肌肉机械反应","authors":"Rodrigo Bueno-Russo ,&nbsp;Jorge Velázquez Saornil ,&nbsp;Germán Díaz-Ureña ,&nbsp;Zacarías Sánchez Milá ,&nbsp;Raúl Frutos Llanes ,&nbsp;José Manuel Barragán Casas ,&nbsp;David Rodríguez Sanz","doi":"10.1016/j.apunsm.2024.100441","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>the muscular response on the main muscles of the propulsive phase of the upper limb in the crawl swimming style has been evaluated by means of tensiomyography (TMG), which was carried out through three parameters: activation time (Td), contraction time (Tc) and maximum deformation (Dm).</p><p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the hypothesis of changes produced between lactic resistance training with passive rest and lactic resistance training with active rest.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>experimental study with ninety swimmers in the crawl stroke, with a mean age of 20 years. The session with passive recovery and the session with active recovery presented results with significant changes after the development of each of them in the Tc in the three muscles analysed, being in the Pectoralis Major (PM), <em>p</em> = 0.001, in the Latissimus Dorsi (LD), <em>p</em> = 0.01 and in the Tríceps Brachii (TB), <em>p</em> = 0.047.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>According to the results it can be deduced that lactic resistance training with passive rest and with active rest do not influence the muscle response if we compare both trainings. Only one of the Tc values changes, while the latissimus dorsi muscle also shows changes in Td.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100113,"journal":{"name":"Apunts Sports Medicine","volume":"59 222","pages":"Article 100441"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666506924000099/pdfft?md5=662087276b54811b05f2d969ddd35127&pid=1-s2.0-S2666506924000099-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Muscle mechanical response to exercise with active vs. passive rest\",\"authors\":\"Rodrigo Bueno-Russo ,&nbsp;Jorge Velázquez Saornil ,&nbsp;Germán Díaz-Ureña ,&nbsp;Zacarías Sánchez Milá ,&nbsp;Raúl Frutos Llanes ,&nbsp;José Manuel Barragán Casas ,&nbsp;David Rodríguez Sanz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apunsm.2024.100441\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>the muscular response on the main muscles of the propulsive phase of the upper limb in the crawl swimming style has been evaluated by means of tensiomyography (TMG), which was carried out through three parameters: activation time (Td), contraction time (Tc) and maximum deformation (Dm).</p><p>The aim of this study is to evaluate the hypothesis of changes produced between lactic resistance training with passive rest and lactic resistance training with active rest.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>experimental study with ninety swimmers in the crawl stroke, with a mean age of 20 years. The session with passive recovery and the session with active recovery presented results with significant changes after the development of each of them in the Tc in the three muscles analysed, being in the Pectoralis Major (PM), <em>p</em> = 0.001, in the Latissimus Dorsi (LD), <em>p</em> = 0.01 and in the Tríceps Brachii (TB), <em>p</em> = 0.047.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>According to the results it can be deduced that lactic resistance training with passive rest and with active rest do not influence the muscle response if we compare both trainings. Only one of the Tc values changes, while the latissimus dorsi muscle also shows changes in Td.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Apunts Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\"59 222\",\"pages\":\"Article 100441\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666506924000099/pdfft?md5=662087276b54811b05f2d969ddd35127&pid=1-s2.0-S2666506924000099-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Apunts Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666506924000099\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apunts Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666506924000099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言 通过绷带肌电图(TMG)评估了爬泳式上肢推进阶段主要肌肉的肌肉反应,该评估通过三个参数进行:激活时间(Td)、收缩时间(Tc)和最大变形(Dm)。本研究的目的是评估被动休息时的乳酸阻力训练和主动休息时的乳酸阻力训练之间产生变化的假设。被动恢复训练和主动恢复训练的结果显示,每种训练结束后,所分析的三块肌肉的 Tc 值都发生了显著变化:胸大肌(PM),p = 0.001;背阔肌(LD),p = 0.01;肱三头肌(TB),p = 0.047。只有一个 Tc 值发生了变化,而背阔肌的 Td 值也发生了变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Muscle mechanical response to exercise with active vs. passive rest

Introduction

the muscular response on the main muscles of the propulsive phase of the upper limb in the crawl swimming style has been evaluated by means of tensiomyography (TMG), which was carried out through three parameters: activation time (Td), contraction time (Tc) and maximum deformation (Dm).

The aim of this study is to evaluate the hypothesis of changes produced between lactic resistance training with passive rest and lactic resistance training with active rest.

Material and methods

experimental study with ninety swimmers in the crawl stroke, with a mean age of 20 years. The session with passive recovery and the session with active recovery presented results with significant changes after the development of each of them in the Tc in the three muscles analysed, being in the Pectoralis Major (PM), p = 0.001, in the Latissimus Dorsi (LD), p = 0.01 and in the Tríceps Brachii (TB), p = 0.047.

Conclusion

According to the results it can be deduced that lactic resistance training with passive rest and with active rest do not influence the muscle response if we compare both trainings. Only one of the Tc values changes, while the latissimus dorsi muscle also shows changes in Td.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信