{"title":"曲率比例空间激光雷达测距与制图 (LOAM)","authors":"Clayder Gonzalez, Martin Adams","doi":"10.1007/s10846-024-02096-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The LiDAR Odometry and Mapping (LOAM) algorithm ranks in second place in the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology and Toyota Technological Institute (KITTI), Visual Odometry/SLAM Evaluations. It utilizes a feature extraction algorithm based on the evaluation of the curvature of points under test, to produce estimated smooth and non-smooth regions within typically laser based Point Cloud Data (PCD). This feature extractor (FE) however, does not take into account PCD spatial or detection uncertainty, which can result in the divergence of the LOAM algorithm. Therefore, this article proposes the use of the Curvature Scale Space (CSS) algorithm as a replacement for LOAM’s current feature extractor. It justifies the substitution, based on the CSS algorithm’s similar computational complexity but improved feature detection repeatability. LOAM’s current feature extractor and the proposed CSS feature extractor are tested and compared with simulated and real data, including the KITTI odometry-laser data set. Additionally, a recent deep learning based LiDAR Odometry (LO) algorithm, the Convolutional Auto-Encoder (CAE)-LO algorithm, will also be compared, using this data set, in terms of its computational speed and performance. Performance comparisons are made based on the Absolute Trajectory Error (ATE) and Cardinalized Optimal Linear Assignment (COLA) metrics. Based on these metrics, the comparisons show significant improvements of the LOAM algorithm with the CSS feature extractor compared with the benchmark versions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54794,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Curvature Scale Space LiDAR Odometry And Mapping (LOAM)\",\"authors\":\"Clayder Gonzalez, Martin Adams\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10846-024-02096-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The LiDAR Odometry and Mapping (LOAM) algorithm ranks in second place in the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology and Toyota Technological Institute (KITTI), Visual Odometry/SLAM Evaluations. It utilizes a feature extraction algorithm based on the evaluation of the curvature of points under test, to produce estimated smooth and non-smooth regions within typically laser based Point Cloud Data (PCD). This feature extractor (FE) however, does not take into account PCD spatial or detection uncertainty, which can result in the divergence of the LOAM algorithm. Therefore, this article proposes the use of the Curvature Scale Space (CSS) algorithm as a replacement for LOAM’s current feature extractor. It justifies the substitution, based on the CSS algorithm’s similar computational complexity but improved feature detection repeatability. LOAM’s current feature extractor and the proposed CSS feature extractor are tested and compared with simulated and real data, including the KITTI odometry-laser data set. Additionally, a recent deep learning based LiDAR Odometry (LO) algorithm, the Convolutional Auto-Encoder (CAE)-LO algorithm, will also be compared, using this data set, in terms of its computational speed and performance. Performance comparisons are made based on the Absolute Trajectory Error (ATE) and Cardinalized Optimal Linear Assignment (COLA) metrics. Based on these metrics, the comparisons show significant improvements of the LOAM algorithm with the CSS feature extractor compared with the benchmark versions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54794,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-024-02096-1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-024-02096-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Curvature Scale Space LiDAR Odometry And Mapping (LOAM)
The LiDAR Odometry and Mapping (LOAM) algorithm ranks in second place in the Karlsruhe Institute of Technology and Toyota Technological Institute (KITTI), Visual Odometry/SLAM Evaluations. It utilizes a feature extraction algorithm based on the evaluation of the curvature of points under test, to produce estimated smooth and non-smooth regions within typically laser based Point Cloud Data (PCD). This feature extractor (FE) however, does not take into account PCD spatial or detection uncertainty, which can result in the divergence of the LOAM algorithm. Therefore, this article proposes the use of the Curvature Scale Space (CSS) algorithm as a replacement for LOAM’s current feature extractor. It justifies the substitution, based on the CSS algorithm’s similar computational complexity but improved feature detection repeatability. LOAM’s current feature extractor and the proposed CSS feature extractor are tested and compared with simulated and real data, including the KITTI odometry-laser data set. Additionally, a recent deep learning based LiDAR Odometry (LO) algorithm, the Convolutional Auto-Encoder (CAE)-LO algorithm, will also be compared, using this data set, in terms of its computational speed and performance. Performance comparisons are made based on the Absolute Trajectory Error (ATE) and Cardinalized Optimal Linear Assignment (COLA) metrics. Based on these metrics, the comparisons show significant improvements of the LOAM algorithm with the CSS feature extractor compared with the benchmark versions.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems bridges the gap between theory and practice in all areas of intelligent systems and robotics. It publishes original, peer reviewed contributions from initial concept and theory to prototyping to final product development and commercialization.
On the theoretical side, the journal features papers focusing on intelligent systems engineering, distributed intelligence systems, multi-level systems, intelligent control, multi-robot systems, cooperation and coordination of unmanned vehicle systems, etc.
On the application side, the journal emphasizes autonomous systems, industrial robotic systems, multi-robot systems, aerial vehicles, mobile robot platforms, underwater robots, sensors, sensor-fusion, and sensor-based control. Readers will also find papers on real applications of intelligent and robotic systems (e.g., mechatronics, manufacturing, biomedical, underwater, humanoid, mobile/legged robot and space applications, etc.).