成人使用透明矫治器治疗期间,疼痛持续时间和严重程度对口腔健康相关生活质量和患者满意度的影响

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 Dentistry
Waleska Caldas, Fabiana Aparecida Bonin, Camila Pereira Vianna, Roberto Hideo Shimizu, Larissa Carvalho Trojan
{"title":"成人使用透明矫治器治疗期间,疼痛持续时间和严重程度对口腔健康相关生活质量和患者满意度的影响","authors":"Waleska Caldas, Fabiana Aparecida Bonin, Camila Pereira Vianna, Roberto Hideo Shimizu, Larissa Carvalho Trojan","doi":"10.1186/s40510-024-00514-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to compare the impact of pain on quality of life and patient satisfaction during treatment with aligners. Ninety-four subjects in active treatment were invited to answer self-reported questions concerning pain severity and duration, occurrence of other signs and symptoms, and level of satisfaction with their treatment. Also, the OHIP-14 questionnaire was applied to assess patients’ OHRQoL. Ninety-four patients (49 women and 45 men) answered the survey. Pain duration of 1–3 days was reported by 69.1% of patients (n = 60). For those who reported pain (n = 84), it was considered mild severity by 42.9% and moderate by 52.4%. Almost sixty-four percent of the sample were very satisfied with the aligner’s aesthetics (n = 60) and forty-nine percent were satisfied with treatment in general (n = 46). Mean OHIP-14 score was 3.36 ± 2.54. OHRQoL was significantly associated with pain severity, whereas patients who reported having experienced moderate pain presented a significantly higher mean OHIP-14 score than those who reported having experienced mild pain (3.92 ± 1.93 and 2.69 ± 2.83, respectively; p = 0.036). The “psychological discomfort” OHIP-14’s domain was the most influenced by the level of pain. Pain severity significantly influenced OHRQoL, in adult patients under treatment with clear aligners. However, high levels of patient satisfaction were reported, regardless of pain duration or severity.","PeriodicalId":56071,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Orthodontics","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of pain duration and severity on oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction during adult treatment with clear aligners\",\"authors\":\"Waleska Caldas, Fabiana Aparecida Bonin, Camila Pereira Vianna, Roberto Hideo Shimizu, Larissa Carvalho Trojan\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s40510-024-00514-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to compare the impact of pain on quality of life and patient satisfaction during treatment with aligners. Ninety-four subjects in active treatment were invited to answer self-reported questions concerning pain severity and duration, occurrence of other signs and symptoms, and level of satisfaction with their treatment. Also, the OHIP-14 questionnaire was applied to assess patients’ OHRQoL. Ninety-four patients (49 women and 45 men) answered the survey. Pain duration of 1–3 days was reported by 69.1% of patients (n = 60). For those who reported pain (n = 84), it was considered mild severity by 42.9% and moderate by 52.4%. Almost sixty-four percent of the sample were very satisfied with the aligner’s aesthetics (n = 60) and forty-nine percent were satisfied with treatment in general (n = 46). Mean OHIP-14 score was 3.36 ± 2.54. OHRQoL was significantly associated with pain severity, whereas patients who reported having experienced moderate pain presented a significantly higher mean OHIP-14 score than those who reported having experienced mild pain (3.92 ± 1.93 and 2.69 ± 2.83, respectively; p = 0.036). The “psychological discomfort” OHIP-14’s domain was the most influenced by the level of pain. Pain severity significantly influenced OHRQoL, in adult patients under treatment with clear aligners. However, high levels of patient satisfaction were reported, regardless of pain duration or severity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56071,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in Orthodontics\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in Orthodontics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-024-00514-6\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Orthodontics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-024-00514-6","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较矫治器治疗期间疼痛对生活质量和患者满意度的影响。研究邀请了94名正在接受治疗的受试者回答有关疼痛的严重程度和持续时间、其他体征和症状的出现以及对治疗的满意程度等自我报告问题。此外,还采用了 OHIP-14 问卷来评估患者的 OHRQoL。94 名患者(49 名女性和 45 名男性)回答了调查问卷。69.1%的患者(n = 60)报告疼痛持续时间为1-3天。在报告疼痛的患者中(n = 84),42.9% 的患者认为疼痛为轻度,52.4% 的患者认为疼痛为中度。近64%的样本对矫治器的美观度非常满意(60人),49%的样本对总体治疗满意(46人)。OHIP-14平均分为3.36±2.54分。OHRQoL与疼痛严重程度有明显相关性,报告经历过中度疼痛的患者的OHIP-14平均得分明显高于报告经历过轻度疼痛的患者(分别为3.92 ± 1.93和2.69 ± 2.83;P = 0.036)。心理不适 "OHIP-14 领域受疼痛程度的影响最大。在接受透明矫治器治疗的成年患者中,疼痛严重程度对OHRQoL的影响很大。然而,无论疼痛持续时间或严重程度如何,患者的满意度都很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of pain duration and severity on oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction during adult treatment with clear aligners
This study aims to compare the impact of pain on quality of life and patient satisfaction during treatment with aligners. Ninety-four subjects in active treatment were invited to answer self-reported questions concerning pain severity and duration, occurrence of other signs and symptoms, and level of satisfaction with their treatment. Also, the OHIP-14 questionnaire was applied to assess patients’ OHRQoL. Ninety-four patients (49 women and 45 men) answered the survey. Pain duration of 1–3 days was reported by 69.1% of patients (n = 60). For those who reported pain (n = 84), it was considered mild severity by 42.9% and moderate by 52.4%. Almost sixty-four percent of the sample were very satisfied with the aligner’s aesthetics (n = 60) and forty-nine percent were satisfied with treatment in general (n = 46). Mean OHIP-14 score was 3.36 ± 2.54. OHRQoL was significantly associated with pain severity, whereas patients who reported having experienced moderate pain presented a significantly higher mean OHIP-14 score than those who reported having experienced mild pain (3.92 ± 1.93 and 2.69 ± 2.83, respectively; p = 0.036). The “psychological discomfort” OHIP-14’s domain was the most influenced by the level of pain. Pain severity significantly influenced OHRQoL, in adult patients under treatment with clear aligners. However, high levels of patient satisfaction were reported, regardless of pain duration or severity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in Orthodontics
Progress in Orthodontics Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
4.20%
发文量
45
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Orthodontics is a fully open access, international journal owned by the Italian Society of Orthodontics and published under the brand SpringerOpen. The Society is currently covering all publication costs so there are no article processing charges for authors. It is a premier journal of international scope that fosters orthodontic research, including both basic research and development of innovative clinical techniques, with an emphasis on the following areas: • Mechanisms to improve orthodontics • Clinical studies and control animal studies • Orthodontics and genetics, genomics • Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) control clinical trials • Efficacy of orthodontic appliances and animal models • Systematic reviews and meta analyses • Mechanisms to speed orthodontic treatment Progress in Orthodontics will consider for publication only meritorious and original contributions. These may be: • Original articles reporting the findings of clinical trials, clinically relevant basic scientific investigations, or novel therapeutic or diagnostic systems • Review articles on current topics • Articles on novel techniques and clinical tools • Articles of contemporary interest
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信